A Sensory Study on the Effect of Different Thickeners in Texture-Modified Chicken Rendang

Q4 Multidisciplinary
Nuraihan Abu Zarim, Syahariza Zainul Abidin, Fazilah Ariffin, Norsila Abdul Wahab
{"title":"A Sensory Study on the Effect of Different Thickeners in Texture-Modified Chicken Rendang","authors":"Nuraihan Abu Zarim, Syahariza Zainul Abidin, Fazilah Ariffin, Norsila Abdul Wahab","doi":"10.32802/asmscj.2023.1236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A sensory study was conducted to evaluate the acceptability of texture modified chicken rendang (TMCR) added with different thickeners (modified corn starch (MC), sago starch (S), tapioca starch (T), xanthan gum (XG) and carboxymethyl cellulose gum (CMC) among healthy elderly consumer. The sensory evaluation was rated using the hedonic test with visual 7-points Cued Facial Scale (CuFS) for ease of swallowing, overall appearance, and overall texture’s attributes. Meanwhile, a categorical scale (‘Yes’ or ‘No’ answer) was used to evaluate purchase intention, liking on the flavour, residues left after swallowing, and sample’s aftertaste. Results showed that all samples were highly accepted for all attributes tested. The insignificant difference between all samples using Cued Facial Scale could be due to similar physical appearance as well as reduced sensory capability among the elderly panellists. Besides, all thickened samples were found to be free from any food residues after swallowing, due to higher cohesion between food particles contributed by the thickeners. In addition, the use of thickeners shown to prevent easy disintegration of food particles during oral consumption which involved tongue and palate shear in the presence of saliva. Even though 79% of the panellists in perceived a starchy taste for all thickened samples, this attribute did not affect the purchase intention and flavour acceptance of the developed products, as both received more than 79% and 85 % likings, respectively. The finding shows that the elderly panellists had a good impression on the developed TMCR, which indicates its promising prospect for product commercialisation.","PeriodicalId":38804,"journal":{"name":"ASM Science Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASM Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2023.1236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A sensory study was conducted to evaluate the acceptability of texture modified chicken rendang (TMCR) added with different thickeners (modified corn starch (MC), sago starch (S), tapioca starch (T), xanthan gum (XG) and carboxymethyl cellulose gum (CMC) among healthy elderly consumer. The sensory evaluation was rated using the hedonic test with visual 7-points Cued Facial Scale (CuFS) for ease of swallowing, overall appearance, and overall texture’s attributes. Meanwhile, a categorical scale (‘Yes’ or ‘No’ answer) was used to evaluate purchase intention, liking on the flavour, residues left after swallowing, and sample’s aftertaste. Results showed that all samples were highly accepted for all attributes tested. The insignificant difference between all samples using Cued Facial Scale could be due to similar physical appearance as well as reduced sensory capability among the elderly panellists. Besides, all thickened samples were found to be free from any food residues after swallowing, due to higher cohesion between food particles contributed by the thickeners. In addition, the use of thickeners shown to prevent easy disintegration of food particles during oral consumption which involved tongue and palate shear in the presence of saliva. Even though 79% of the panellists in perceived a starchy taste for all thickened samples, this attribute did not affect the purchase intention and flavour acceptance of the developed products, as both received more than 79% and 85 % likings, respectively. The finding shows that the elderly panellists had a good impression on the developed TMCR, which indicates its promising prospect for product commercialisation.
不同增稠剂对肉质改性鸡仁当效果的感官研究
采用感官研究方法,评价了添加不同增稠剂(改性玉米淀粉(MC)、西米淀粉(S)、木薯淀粉(T)、黄原胶(XG)和羧甲基纤维素胶(CMC)的质地改性鸡仁当(TMCR)在健康老年消费者中的可接受性。感官评估使用视觉7点提示面部量表(CuFS)的特征测试进行评分,以评估吞咽的容易程度、整体外观和整体质地的属性。同时,使用分类量表(“是”或“否”答案)来评估购买意向、对味道的喜好、吞咽后残留的残留物以及样品的回味。结果显示,所有样本的所有测试属性都得到了高度认可。使用Cued Faceal Scale的所有样本之间的差异不显著,可能是由于老年小组成员的身体外观相似以及感官能力下降。此外,由于增稠剂提高了食物颗粒之间的内聚力,所有增稠样品在吞咽后都没有任何食物残渣。此外,增稠剂的使用表明,在口腔食用过程中,可以防止食物颗粒容易分解,这涉及到在唾液存在的情况下舌头和腭部的剪切。尽管79%的小组成员认为所有增稠样品都有淀粉味,但这一特性并没有影响所开发产品的购买意愿和口味接受度,因为两者的喜爱度分别超过79%和85%。研究结果表明,老年小组成员对开发的TMCR印象良好,这表明其产品商业化前景广阔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASM Science Journal
ASM Science Journal Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The ASM Science Journal publishes advancements in the broad fields of medical, engineering, earth, mathematical, physical, chemical and agricultural sciences as well as ICT. Scientific articles published will be on the basis of originality, importance and significant contribution to science, scientific research and the public. Scientific articles published will be on the basis of originality, importance and significant contribution to science, scientific research and the public. Scientists who subscribe to the fields listed above will be the source of papers to the journal. All articles will be reviewed by at least two experts in that particular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信