THE ANALYSIS OF ITEM PROBLEMS IN HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS TEXTBOOK IN INDONESIA (2016 REVISION EDITION) REVIEWED FROM THE COGNITIVE ASPECT OF TIMSS

Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2019-03-11 DOI:10.25134/IJLI.V2I01.1685

Siti Khodaria, A. Maharani, Herri Sulaiman

{"title":"THE ANALYSIS OF ITEM PROBLEMS IN HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS TEXTBOOK IN INDONESIA (2016 REVISION EDITION) REVIEWED FROM THE COGNITIVE ASPECT OF TIMSS","authors":"Siti Khodaria, A. Maharani, Herri Sulaiman","doi":"10.25134/IJLI.V2I01.1685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the question items on two supplementary Indonesian mathematics textbooks (revised edition 2016) of 2013 curriculum for XI graders and compare the analysis using 2015 TIMSS assessment framework. This study apply qualitative study with naturalistic approach. The analysis results consist of 104 question items and 85 items of practice test. On a book published by PT. SEWU Bandung shows 3.5% of knowing cognitive domain, 4.71% applying, and 91.76% reasoning. The analysis on 19 items of practice test on a book is published by PT. Bumi Aksara Jakarta. It shows 10.53% applying, 89.47% reasoning, but not showing a percentage on knowing cognitive domain. Results of the question items analysis on knowing and applying cognitive domain for both the books are less percentage than reasoning cognitive domain. Thus, the results of analysis of two textbooks are not yet in accordance with TIMSS. Nevertheless, the comparison of the analysis on knowing cognitive domain in a book published by PT. SEWU Bandung is close to what have expected by TIMSS. Meanwhile, on applying and reasoning cognitive domain the book published by PT. Bumi Aksara Jakarta is close to what have expected by TIMSS.","PeriodicalId":33696,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25134/IJLI.V2I01.1685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the question items on two supplementary Indonesian mathematics textbooks (revised edition 2016) of 2013 curriculum for XI graders and compare the analysis using 2015 TIMSS assessment framework. This study apply qualitative study with naturalistic approach. The analysis results consist of 104 question items and 85 items of practice test. On a book published by PT. SEWU Bandung shows 3.5% of knowing cognitive domain, 4.71% applying, and 91.76% reasoning. The analysis on 19 items of practice test on a book is published by PT. Bumi Aksara Jakarta. It shows 10.53% applying, 89.47% reasoning, but not showing a percentage on knowing cognitive domain. Results of the question items analysis on knowing and applying cognitive domain for both the books are less percentage than reasoning cognitive domain. Thus, the results of analysis of two textbooks are not yet in accordance with TIMSS. Nevertheless, the comparison of the analysis on knowing cognitive domain in a book published by PT. SEWU Bandung is close to what have expected by TIMSS. Meanwhile, on applying and reasoning cognitive domain the book published by PT. Bumi Aksara Jakarta is close to what have expected by TIMSS.

查看原文本刊更多论文

从时间的认知角度审视印尼高中数学教科书(2016年修订版)的题项问题分析

本研究旨在分析XI年级2013年课程的两本印度尼西亚数学补充教材（2016年修订版）的问题项目，并使用2015年TIMSS评估框架进行比较。本研究采用自然方法进行定性研究。分析结果包括104个问题项目和85个实践测试项目。在PT出版的一本书中，SEWU Bandung显示3.5%的人知道认知领域，4.71%的人应用，91.76%的人推理。对一本书中19个练习测试项目的分析由雅加达PT Bumi Aksara出版。应用率为10.53%，推理率为89.47%，但对认知领域的了解率不高。两本书对认知领域的认知和应用的题项分析结果均低于推理认知领域。因此，对两本教科书的分析结果尚不符合TIMSS。然而，对万隆教授出版的一本书中关于认知领域的分析进行比较，与TIMSS的预期非常接近。同时，在认知领域的应用和推理方面，雅加达PT。Bumi Aksara出版的这本书与TIMSS的预期非常接近。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6 weeks