Rule-Following and Social Theory

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki Pub Date : 2020-08-03 DOI:10.5840/eps202057340

V. Surovtsev

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article contains some considerations on influence of Wittgenstein’s Problem of Rule-Following to Social Theories, especially as it is analyzed in the text of K.A. Rodin. I consider “skeptical decision” of S. Kripke, and demonstrate that in some new situation’s theory of G. Baker and P. Hacker are preferable.

查看原文本刊更多论文

规则遵循与社会理论

本文对维特根斯坦的规则遵循问题对社会理论的影响进行了一些思考，特别是在罗丹的文本中进行了分析。本文考虑了S. Kripke的“怀疑决策”理论，并论证了在某些新形势下G. Baker和P. Hacker的理论更为可取。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Epistemology & Philosophy of Science is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal established in 2004 by the Institute of Philosophy (Russian Academy of Sciences). It is devoted to the themes in modern epistemology, philosophy of science, philosophy of language, and philosophy of mind. The journal supports the policy of interdisciplinarity. It’s based on the belief that the comprehensive analysis of cultural phenomena couldn’t be completed without focusing on the problems of cognition. The epistemological analysis, however, needs the research results from human, social and natural sciences. Sections of the journal: 1.Editorial 2.Panel Discussion 3.Epistemology and Cognition 4.Language and Mind 5.Vista 6.Case Studies -Science Studies 7.Interdisciplinary Studies 8.Archive 9.Symposium 10.Book Reviews