Tracking Public and Private Responses to the COVID-19 Epidemic

IF 3.1 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Sumedha Gupta, Thuy Nguyen, Shyam Raman, Byungkyu Lee, Felipe Lozano-Rojas, A. Bento, K. Simon, Coady Wing
{"title":"Tracking Public and Private Responses to the COVID-19 Epidemic","authors":"Sumedha Gupta, Thuy Nguyen, Shyam Raman, Byungkyu Lee, Felipe Lozano-Rojas, A. Bento, K. Simon, Coady Wing","doi":"10.1086/716197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the determinants of social distancing during the shutdown phase of the COVID-19 epidemic. We classify state and local government actions, and we study multiple proxies for social distancing based on data from smart devices. Mobility fell substantially in all states, even ones that did not adopt major distancing mandates. Most of the fall in mobility occurred prior to the most stringent sanctions against movement, such as stay-at-home laws. However, we find evidence suggesting that state and local policies did have an independent effect on mobility even after the large initial reductions occurred. Event studies show that early and information-focused actions such as first case announcements, emergency declarations, and school closures reduced mobility by 1–5 percent after five days. Between March 1 and April 14, average time spent at home grew from 9.1 hours to 13.9 hours. We find, for example, that without state emergency declarations, hours at home would have been 11.3 hours in April, suggesting that 55 percent of the growth is associated with policy and 45 percent is associated with (non-policy) trends. State and local government actions induced changes in mobility on top of a large and private response across all states to the prevailing knowledge of public health risks.","PeriodicalId":45056,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Economics","volume":"7 1","pages":"361 - 404"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/716197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

This paper examines the determinants of social distancing during the shutdown phase of the COVID-19 epidemic. We classify state and local government actions, and we study multiple proxies for social distancing based on data from smart devices. Mobility fell substantially in all states, even ones that did not adopt major distancing mandates. Most of the fall in mobility occurred prior to the most stringent sanctions against movement, such as stay-at-home laws. However, we find evidence suggesting that state and local policies did have an independent effect on mobility even after the large initial reductions occurred. Event studies show that early and information-focused actions such as first case announcements, emergency declarations, and school closures reduced mobility by 1–5 percent after five days. Between March 1 and April 14, average time spent at home grew from 9.1 hours to 13.9 hours. We find, for example, that without state emergency declarations, hours at home would have been 11.3 hours in April, suggesting that 55 percent of the growth is associated with policy and 45 percent is associated with (non-policy) trends. State and local government actions induced changes in mobility on top of a large and private response across all states to the prevailing knowledge of public health risks.
追踪公共和私人对新冠肺炎疫情的反应
本文探讨了COVID-19疫情关闭阶段社会距离的决定因素。我们对州和地方政府的行为进行分类,并根据智能设备的数据研究了社交距离的多个代理。所有州的流动性都大幅下降,即使是那些没有采取重大距离规定的州也是如此。大多数流动性下降发生在最严厉的行动制裁之前,比如居家法。然而,我们发现有证据表明,即使在最初大量减少之后,州和地方政策确实对流动性产生了独立的影响。事件研究表明,早期和注重信息的行动,如首次病例宣布、紧急声明和学校关闭,在5天后减少了1 - 5%的流动性。从3月1日到4月14日,在家的平均时间从9.1小时增加到13.9小时。例如,我们发现,如果没有国家紧急声明,4月份在家的时间将是11.3小时,这表明55%的增长与政策有关,45%与(非政策)趋势有关。州和地方政府的行动导致了流动性的变化,除此之外,所有州都对公共卫生风险的普遍认识做出了大规模的私人反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health Economics (AJHE) provides a forum for the in-depth analysis of health care markets and individual health behaviors. The articles appearing in AJHE are authored by scholars from universities, private research organizations, government, and industry. Subjects of interest include competition among private insurers, hospitals, and physicians; impacts of public insurance programs, including the Affordable Care Act; pharmaceutical innovation and regulation; medical device supply; the rise of obesity and its consequences; the influence and growth of aging populations; and much more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信