Evaluation of latest marine gravity field models derived from satellite altimetry over the Gulf of Guinea (Central Africa) with shipborne gravity data

IF 0.5 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Paul Gautier Kamto, Loudi Yap, Sévérin Nguiya, Ludovic Houetchak Kandé, Joseph Kamguia
{"title":"Evaluation of latest marine gravity field models derived from satellite altimetry over the Gulf of Guinea (Central Africa) with shipborne gravity data","authors":"Paul Gautier Kamto,&nbsp;Loudi Yap,&nbsp;Sévérin Nguiya,&nbsp;Ludovic Houetchak Kandé,&nbsp;Joseph Kamguia","doi":"10.1007/s11200-021-0157-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The marine gravity field is vital for mapping various submarine geological and tectonic structures, also for computation of high-resolution gravimetric geoid. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of two latest high-resolution marine gravity models derived from satellite altimetry (DTU17 and SSv27.1) using shipborne gravity data and to pruduce high-precision gravity field over the Gulf of Guinea. The gross-errors affecting the shipborne gravity data have been removed by cross-validation technique to ensure better evaluation of gravity field models. The standard deviation σ of the differences between the measured and model gravity data drops from 9.96 mGal before the cross-validation to 6.28 mGal after this process. The comparison between the DTU17 and SSv27.1 gravity field models has been done in order to detect significant differences between them. The differences between the two models are quite small with a mean of 1.73 mGal and σ of 6.55 mGal. The discrepancies between them are found around coastal areas and along islands. This shows the poor accuracy of satellite altimetry near coastal areas. Afterwards, the accuracy of each marine gravity field models was evaluated using shipborne gravity data free of gross-errors. The SSv27.1 model fits better to the shipborne gravity data with a mean of −4.88 mGal and σ of 7.18 mGal. Hence, the SSv27.1 model has a better performance than the DTU17 model on the Gulf of Guinea. Finally, we used the least-squares collocation technique associated to the Markov model of second-order covariance to combine the SSv27.1 model with the shipborne gravity data. We produced here a marine gravity field of good accuracy around the Gulf of Guinea with no data gaps. The precision of this combined gravity field is estimated to be 5.54 mGal with a spatial resolution of 1 arc-minute.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","volume":"66 1-2","pages":"23 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11200-021-0157-y.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11200-021-0157-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The marine gravity field is vital for mapping various submarine geological and tectonic structures, also for computation of high-resolution gravimetric geoid. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of two latest high-resolution marine gravity models derived from satellite altimetry (DTU17 and SSv27.1) using shipborne gravity data and to pruduce high-precision gravity field over the Gulf of Guinea. The gross-errors affecting the shipborne gravity data have been removed by cross-validation technique to ensure better evaluation of gravity field models. The standard deviation σ of the differences between the measured and model gravity data drops from 9.96 mGal before the cross-validation to 6.28 mGal after this process. The comparison between the DTU17 and SSv27.1 gravity field models has been done in order to detect significant differences between them. The differences between the two models are quite small with a mean of 1.73 mGal and σ of 6.55 mGal. The discrepancies between them are found around coastal areas and along islands. This shows the poor accuracy of satellite altimetry near coastal areas. Afterwards, the accuracy of each marine gravity field models was evaluated using shipborne gravity data free of gross-errors. The SSv27.1 model fits better to the shipborne gravity data with a mean of −4.88 mGal and σ of 7.18 mGal. Hence, the SSv27.1 model has a better performance than the DTU17 model on the Gulf of Guinea. Finally, we used the least-squares collocation technique associated to the Markov model of second-order covariance to combine the SSv27.1 model with the shipborne gravity data. We produced here a marine gravity field of good accuracy around the Gulf of Guinea with no data gaps. The precision of this combined gravity field is estimated to be 5.54 mGal with a spatial resolution of 1 arc-minute.

利用船载重力数据评估几内亚湾(中非)卫星测高数据得出的最新海洋重力场模型
海洋重力场是绘制各种海底地质构造图和计算高分辨率重力大地水准面所必需的。本研究旨在利用船载重力数据,评估两种最新的卫星测高海洋重力模型(DTU17和SSv27.1)的精度,并生成几内亚湾上空的高精度重力场。通过交叉验证技术消除了影响船载重力数据的粗误差,保证了重力场模型的更好评价。实测重力数据与模型重力数据之差的标准差σ由交叉验证前的9.96 mGal降至交叉验证后的6.28 mGal。对DTU17和SSv27.1重力场模型进行了比较,发现两者之间存在显著差异。两种模型之间的差异很小,平均为1.73 mGal, σ为6.55 mGal。它们之间的差异在沿海地区和岛屿周围发现。这表明在沿海地区附近卫星测高精度较差。然后,利用无粗差的船载重力数据对各海洋重力场模型的精度进行了评价。SSv27.1模型与船载重力数据拟合较好,平均为- 4.88 mGal, σ为7.18 mGal。因此,SSv27.1型号在几内亚湾的性能优于DTU17型号。最后,利用二阶协方差马尔可夫模型相结合的最小二乘配置技术,将SSv27.1模型与船载重力数据进行组合。我们在几内亚湾周围制作了一个精度很高的海洋重力场,没有数据缺口。该组合重力场的精度估计为5.54 mGal,空间分辨率为1弧分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Studia geophysica et geodaetica is an international journal covering all aspects of geophysics, meteorology and climatology, and of geodesy. Published by the Institute of Geophysics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, it has a long tradition, being published quarterly since 1956. Studia publishes theoretical and methodological contributions, which are of interest for academia as well as industry. The journal offers fast publication of contributions in regular as well as topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信