Consumer Engagement with Brands’ COVID-19 Messaging on Social Media: The Role of Perceived Brand–Social Issue Fit and Brand Opportunism

IF 10.2 Q1 Social Sciences
J. Mundel, Jing Yang
{"title":"Consumer Engagement with Brands’ COVID-19 Messaging on Social Media: The Role of Perceived Brand–Social Issue Fit and Brand Opportunism","authors":"J. Mundel, Jing Yang","doi":"10.1080/15252019.2021.1958274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While the trade press has started to report on consumer responses to brand messaging about the ongoing novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, empirical results have yet to emerge. In this study, we investigated how consumers in the United States responded to Instagram ads containing COVID-19 claims based on the perceived brand–social issue fit, which is determined by whether the brand’s product was considered essential or nonessential. Results showed perceived brand–social issue fit to be of dual nature, where stronger perceptions of fit (i.e., essential products advertised with COVID-19 claims) resulted in more positive ad evaluations, brand attitudes, and consumer engagement intentions. Lower perceptions of fit (i.e., nonessential products with COVID-19 claims) led to perceptions of brand opportunism, which we conceptualized as a negative evaluative outcome that negatively impacted ad/brand attitude and consumer engagement intentions. The findings provide insights for brands interested in placing ads addressing the changing environmental conditions resulting from COVID-19 and advances the literature on pandemic messaging.","PeriodicalId":37217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interactive Advertising","volume":"21 1","pages":"173 - 190"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interactive Advertising","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2021.1958274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract While the trade press has started to report on consumer responses to brand messaging about the ongoing novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, empirical results have yet to emerge. In this study, we investigated how consumers in the United States responded to Instagram ads containing COVID-19 claims based on the perceived brand–social issue fit, which is determined by whether the brand’s product was considered essential or nonessential. Results showed perceived brand–social issue fit to be of dual nature, where stronger perceptions of fit (i.e., essential products advertised with COVID-19 claims) resulted in more positive ad evaluations, brand attitudes, and consumer engagement intentions. Lower perceptions of fit (i.e., nonessential products with COVID-19 claims) led to perceptions of brand opportunism, which we conceptualized as a negative evaluative outcome that negatively impacted ad/brand attitude and consumer engagement intentions. The findings provide insights for brands interested in placing ads addressing the changing environmental conditions resulting from COVID-19 and advances the literature on pandemic messaging.
消费者参与品牌在社交媒体上的COVID-19信息:感知品牌社会问题契合度和品牌机会主义的作用
虽然行业媒体已经开始报道消费者对正在进行的新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行的品牌信息的反应,但实证结果尚未出现。在这项研究中,我们调查了美国消费者如何根据感知到的品牌社会问题契合度来回应包含COVID-19声明的Instagram广告,这取决于该品牌的产品是被认为是必不可少的还是非必不可少的。结果显示,感知到的品牌社会问题契合度具有双重性质,其中更强的契合度(即,宣传COVID-19的基本产品)导致更积极的广告评价、品牌态度和消费者参与意愿。对契合度的认知度较低(即声称患有COVID-19的非必需产品)导致对品牌机会主义的看法,我们将其概念化为负面评估结果,对广告/品牌态度和消费者参与意愿产生负面影响。这些发现为有兴趣投放广告以应对COVID-19导致的环境变化的品牌提供了见解,并推进了关于大流行信息的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interactive Advertising
Journal of Interactive Advertising Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书