Can Microbes Be Active Participants in Research? Developing a Methodology for Collaborating with Plastic-Eating Microbes

IF 1.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Aaron Bradshaw
{"title":"Can Microbes Be Active Participants in Research? Developing a Methodology for Collaborating with Plastic-Eating Microbes","authors":"Aaron Bradshaw","doi":"10.1215/22011919-9712379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The emergence of Ideonella sakaiensis, a microorganism with the capacity to metabolize the widely used plastic polyethylene terephthalate (PET), raises important questions about how human and nonhuman agency are related in responding to pressing environmental issues. The article explores how the agency and expertise of I. sakaiensis is a constitutive but often overlooked collaborator in scientific research into plastic biodegradation, and it attempts to develop a methodology for enrolling microorganisms as active research participants from the outset. Knowledge coproduced with microbial others, and specifically those microbes with the capacity to detoxify anthropogenic pollutants, may inform and enact inclusive and prescient responses to ongoing environmental degradation. Accordingly, drawing from theoretical orientations in more-than-human participatory research and animals’ geographies, the article asks how microorganisms might express their own directives, preferences, and constraints on the research process, and how, in turn, we might listen and be directed by them. Although the ontological and ethical commitments of the environmental humanities are well suited for welcoming microbes as partners in deliberative processes, the challenges of communicating with them across vast scalar and bodily differences suggests a need to engage with techniques traditionally considered the disciplinary property of the natural sciences. Some of these concepts are contextualized with respect to a research project currently being undertaken at the River Lea in East London and the attempt to enroll I. sakaiensis as a collaborator in responding to plastic pollution in the river.","PeriodicalId":46497,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-9712379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The emergence of Ideonella sakaiensis, a microorganism with the capacity to metabolize the widely used plastic polyethylene terephthalate (PET), raises important questions about how human and nonhuman agency are related in responding to pressing environmental issues. The article explores how the agency and expertise of I. sakaiensis is a constitutive but often overlooked collaborator in scientific research into plastic biodegradation, and it attempts to develop a methodology for enrolling microorganisms as active research participants from the outset. Knowledge coproduced with microbial others, and specifically those microbes with the capacity to detoxify anthropogenic pollutants, may inform and enact inclusive and prescient responses to ongoing environmental degradation. Accordingly, drawing from theoretical orientations in more-than-human participatory research and animals’ geographies, the article asks how microorganisms might express their own directives, preferences, and constraints on the research process, and how, in turn, we might listen and be directed by them. Although the ontological and ethical commitments of the environmental humanities are well suited for welcoming microbes as partners in deliberative processes, the challenges of communicating with them across vast scalar and bodily differences suggests a need to engage with techniques traditionally considered the disciplinary property of the natural sciences. Some of these concepts are contextualized with respect to a research project currently being undertaken at the River Lea in East London and the attempt to enroll I. sakaiensis as a collaborator in responding to plastic pollution in the river.
微生物能成为研究的积极参与者吗?开发一种与吃塑料微生物合作的方法
萨凯氏Ideonella sakaiensis是一种能够代谢广泛使用的塑料聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)的微生物,它的出现引发了人们对人类和非人类机构在应对紧迫的环境问题时如何联系的重要问题。这篇文章探讨了在塑料生物降解的科学研究中,萨卡氏菌的机构和专业知识是如何成为一个组成部分但经常被忽视的合作者的,并试图从一开始就开发一种将微生物作为积极研究参与者的方法。与其他微生物,特别是那些有能力对人为污染物进行解毒的微生物共同产生的知识,可以为正在进行的环境退化提供信息并制定包容性和前瞻性的应对措施。因此,本文从人类参与性研究和动物地理的理论方向出发,询问微生物如何在研究过程中表达自己的指令、偏好和约束,以及反过来,我们如何倾听和接受它们的指导。尽管环境人文学科的本体论和伦理承诺非常适合欢迎微生物作为审议过程中的合作伙伴,但跨越巨大的标量和身体差异与它们交流的挑战表明,需要采用传统上被视为自然科学学科性质的技术。其中一些概念是针对目前正在伦敦东部利亚河进行的一个研究项目,以及将萨凯氏菌作为合作者应对该河塑料污染的尝试而提出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Humanities
Environmental Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
32
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信