Assessment for and of learning in nonlinear movement education practices

IF 2.9 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
B. Tolgfors, D. Barker, G. Nyberg, H. Larsson
{"title":"Assessment for and of learning in nonlinear movement education practices","authors":"B. Tolgfors, D. Barker, G. Nyberg, H. Larsson","doi":"10.1080/17408989.2023.2230244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Principles such as instructional alignment and step-by-step progression are often seen as crucial features of good assessment practices in school physical education (PE). These features are problematic from nonlinear educational perspectives, which are based on the idea that movement learning cannot be expected to take place in the same manner for all students. Without some resolution of the contradiction between nonlinear pedagogies and principles of good assessment, the likelihood of physical educators fully embracing any kind of nonlinear approach to movement education remains doubtful. Purpose and research question: Our purpose in this paper is to illustrate how assessment for and of learning (AfL and AoL) can look when implemented in nonlinear movement education practices. Methods: Illustrations of AfL and AoL are drawn from an investigation in which one educator implements a nonlinear movement education module. The module focuses on juggling for students at high school (grade nine students aged approximately 15 years). The module provided students with 10 × 50-minute lessons to explore juggling. Data were generated through observations ( fi lm clips and fi eld notes) and ethnographic-type interviews that were conducted with the students during the lessons. Findings: In the context of the nonlinear movement education module, AfL became: Interacting with students in joint exploration; Introducing learning strategies; Encouraging students to clarify and verbalise the object of learning; Helping students identify critical aspects of the movement activity, and; Inviting students to consider alternative learning trajectories. The educator then evaluates the students ’ learning experiences in the context of a group performance at the end of the module. This performance can be seen as an instance of holistic assessment within a nonlinear movement education practice. Conclusions: The suggested holistic perspective on PE assessment could help educators to: circumvent dichotomies such as mind-body and theory-practice; approach students as active meaning-makers; re-frame students ’ actions as emergent and context-dependent; and replace direct instruction with explorative teaching and learning methods. The major contribution of this study is that it shows how assessment for and of learning can be implemented in nonlinear movement education practices within a linear, goal-related and criterion-referenced, education system","PeriodicalId":47917,"journal":{"name":"Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2023.2230244","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Principles such as instructional alignment and step-by-step progression are often seen as crucial features of good assessment practices in school physical education (PE). These features are problematic from nonlinear educational perspectives, which are based on the idea that movement learning cannot be expected to take place in the same manner for all students. Without some resolution of the contradiction between nonlinear pedagogies and principles of good assessment, the likelihood of physical educators fully embracing any kind of nonlinear approach to movement education remains doubtful. Purpose and research question: Our purpose in this paper is to illustrate how assessment for and of learning (AfL and AoL) can look when implemented in nonlinear movement education practices. Methods: Illustrations of AfL and AoL are drawn from an investigation in which one educator implements a nonlinear movement education module. The module focuses on juggling for students at high school (grade nine students aged approximately 15 years). The module provided students with 10 × 50-minute lessons to explore juggling. Data were generated through observations ( fi lm clips and fi eld notes) and ethnographic-type interviews that were conducted with the students during the lessons. Findings: In the context of the nonlinear movement education module, AfL became: Interacting with students in joint exploration; Introducing learning strategies; Encouraging students to clarify and verbalise the object of learning; Helping students identify critical aspects of the movement activity, and; Inviting students to consider alternative learning trajectories. The educator then evaluates the students ’ learning experiences in the context of a group performance at the end of the module. This performance can be seen as an instance of holistic assessment within a nonlinear movement education practice. Conclusions: The suggested holistic perspective on PE assessment could help educators to: circumvent dichotomies such as mind-body and theory-practice; approach students as active meaning-makers; re-frame students ’ actions as emergent and context-dependent; and replace direct instruction with explorative teaching and learning methods. The major contribution of this study is that it shows how assessment for and of learning can be implemented in nonlinear movement education practices within a linear, goal-related and criterion-referenced, education system
非线性运动教育实践中学习评价
背景:教学一致性和循序渐进等原则通常被视为学校体育(PE)良好评估实践的关键特征。从非线性教育的角度来看,这些特征是有问题的,非线性教育的观点是基于运动学习不可能以同样的方式发生在所有学生身上。如果不解决非线性教学法和良好评价原则之间的矛盾,体育教育者完全接受任何一种非线性运动教育方法的可能性仍然值得怀疑。目的和研究问题:我们在本文中的目的是说明如何评估和学习(AfL和AoL)可以在非线性运动教育实践中实施。方法:从一名教育工作者实施非线性运动教育模块的调查中提取AfL和AoL的实例。该模块侧重于为高中学生(大约15岁的九年级学生)提供杂耍。该模块为学生提供了10 × 50分钟的课程来探索杂耍。数据是通过观察(电影片段和实地笔记)和在课堂上与学生进行的民族志类型的访谈产生的。研究发现:在非线性运动教育模块的背景下,学生自主学习成为:在共同探索中与学生互动;引入学习策略;鼓励学生厘清和用语言表达学习对象;帮助学生识别运动活动的关键方面;邀请学生考虑不同的学习轨迹。然后,在模块结束时,教育者在小组表演的背景下评估学生的学习经验。这个表演可以看作是非线性运动教育实践中整体评估的一个实例。结论:建议的体育评价整体观有助于教育工作者规避身心和理论实践的二元对立;把学生培养成积极的意义制造者;将学生的行为重新定义为紧急的和情境依赖的;用探索性的教学方法代替直接教学。本研究的主要贡献在于,它展示了如何在线性、目标相关和标准参考的教育系统中,在非线性运动教育实践中实施学习评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy is the official research journal of the Association for Physical Education (AfPE). The journal provides a forum for high quality educational research intended to have a high impact on both policy and practice for a national and international readership. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy publishes research that reports educational practices in all appropriate contexts including, but not limited to, school physical education, club sport, and active leisure programs. The journal considers papers that discuss a broad range of physical activities, including aquatics, dance, exercise, gymnastics, outdoor and adventure activities, meditative and martial arts and sport. Pedagogy in these contexts refers to the interacting and interdependent components of knowledge and curriculum, learners and learning, and teachers/coaches, teaching/coaching and teacher/coach education. The journal particularly welcomes papers that consider the interactions of each of these components and their practice in specific contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信