{"title":"An Ambivalent View of Colonialism: The Spinozist Design for a Settlement in New Netherland","authors":"M. Paijmans","doi":"10.1353/JEM.2020.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Franciscus van den Enden (1602–1674) was an Amsterdam Latin school owner, radical egalitarian, and enigmatic figure in Spinoza’s circle. Among his sparse publications is the Brief Account of New Netherland (1662), a design for a democratic settlement in North America. Although Brief Account does not mention Spinoza by name, it is in many ways reminiscent of his naturalist philosophy. This article explores how Spinozist ideas function in Van den Enden’s utopia, focusing on the notion of “sovereignty,” the full right and power of a governing body over itself. The first part of the article demonstrates how Van den Enden’s representation of Native American society functions as a model for his self-governing settlement. The representation in projecting Spinozist ideas of sovereignty on Native American society can be considered a radical—if covert—critique of European state power as well as a typical case of Eurocentrism. The second part aims to reconcile Van den Enden’s critique of European state power with the fact that his design for a settlement is implicated in the overseas extension of Dutch sovereignty. The article concludes that Brief Account conveys an ambivalent view of colonialism as both an extreme expression of and an opportunity for escape from European state power.","PeriodicalId":42614,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"1 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/JEM.2020.0018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/JEM.2020.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
abstract:Franciscus van den Enden (1602–1674) was an Amsterdam Latin school owner, radical egalitarian, and enigmatic figure in Spinoza’s circle. Among his sparse publications is the Brief Account of New Netherland (1662), a design for a democratic settlement in North America. Although Brief Account does not mention Spinoza by name, it is in many ways reminiscent of his naturalist philosophy. This article explores how Spinozist ideas function in Van den Enden’s utopia, focusing on the notion of “sovereignty,” the full right and power of a governing body over itself. The first part of the article demonstrates how Van den Enden’s representation of Native American society functions as a model for his self-governing settlement. The representation in projecting Spinozist ideas of sovereignty on Native American society can be considered a radical—if covert—critique of European state power as well as a typical case of Eurocentrism. The second part aims to reconcile Van den Enden’s critique of European state power with the fact that his design for a settlement is implicated in the overseas extension of Dutch sovereignty. The article concludes that Brief Account conveys an ambivalent view of colonialism as both an extreme expression of and an opportunity for escape from European state power.
范登恩登(francis van den Enden, 1602-1674)是阿姆斯特丹一所拉丁学校的老板,是斯宾诺莎圈子里的激进平等主义者和神秘人物。在他为数不多的出版物中,有《新荷兰简记》(1662),这是一份关于北美民主解决方案的设计。虽然《简论》没有提到斯宾诺莎的名字,但它在很多方面都让人想起他的自然主义哲学。本文探讨了斯宾诺莎思想如何在范登恩登的乌托邦中发挥作用,重点关注“主权”的概念,即一个治理机构对自身的全部权利和权力。文章的第一部分展示了范登恩登对美洲原住民社会的表现如何成为他的自治殖民地的典范。将斯宾诺莎的主权思想投射到美洲土著社会的表现可以被认为是对欧洲国家权力的激进(如果隐蔽的话)批评,也是欧洲中心主义的典型案例。第二部分的目的是调和范登恩登对欧洲国家权力的批评与他的解决方案涉及荷兰主权的海外扩张这一事实。文章的结论是,简要叙述传达了一种矛盾的观点,即殖民主义既是对欧洲国家权力的极端表达,又是逃离欧洲国家权力的机会。