Effects of soil bulk density and water content on penetration resistance

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jarrett M. Lardy, Thomas M. DeSutter, Aaron L. M. Daigh, Miranda A. Meehan, James A. Staricka
{"title":"Effects of soil bulk density and water content on penetration resistance","authors":"Jarrett M. Lardy,&nbsp;Thomas M. DeSutter,&nbsp;Aaron L. M. Daigh,&nbsp;Miranda A. Meehan,&nbsp;James A. Staricka","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Infrastructure installation (e.g., pipelines) disturbs soils, often resulting in increased soil compaction (bulk density [Bd] and penetration resistance [PR]). The relationship of PR to Bd, gravimetric water content (Θg), and a suite of other properties were determined on seven topsoils to provide a model and database for reclamation specialists to use when assessing disturbed soils. Penetration resistance had a strong linear association with Bd, but higher Θg reduced the range of PR as Bd increased. Step-wise regression identified Bd, Θg, texture, clay speciation, and organic matter as significant factors to predict PR. The model predicts PR from &lt;1 to 8 MPa and closely match measured values. Soil Bd and Θg contributed to 84% of the model's explained variation in predicting PR. This study provides a tool for reclamation specialists that aids in understanding the risks associated with disturbances and highlights the importance of keeping Θg low during installation of pipelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20096","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Infrastructure installation (e.g., pipelines) disturbs soils, often resulting in increased soil compaction (bulk density [Bd] and penetration resistance [PR]). The relationship of PR to Bd, gravimetric water content (Θg), and a suite of other properties were determined on seven topsoils to provide a model and database for reclamation specialists to use when assessing disturbed soils. Penetration resistance had a strong linear association with Bd, but higher Θg reduced the range of PR as Bd increased. Step-wise regression identified Bd, Θg, texture, clay speciation, and organic matter as significant factors to predict PR. The model predicts PR from <1 to 8 MPa and closely match measured values. Soil Bd and Θg contributed to 84% of the model's explained variation in predicting PR. This study provides a tool for reclamation specialists that aids in understanding the risks associated with disturbances and highlights the importance of keeping Θg low during installation of pipelines.

Abstract Image

土壤容重和含水量对渗透阻力的影响
基础设施安装(如管道)扰动土壤,通常导致土壤压实度增加(体积密度[Bd]和渗透阻力[PR])。在七种表土上确定了PR与Bd、重量含水量(Θg)和一系列其他特性的关系,为复垦专家评估扰动土壤时提供了一个模型和数据库。渗透阻力与Bd有很强的线性关系,但随着Bd的增加,更高的θg降低了PR的范围。逐步回归确定Bd、θg、质地、粘土形态和有机质是预测PR的重要因素。该模型预测PR在<1至8MPa之间,并与测量值密切匹配。土壤Bd和θg在预测PR时占模型解释变化的84%。这项研究为填海专家提供了一个工具,有助于了解与干扰相关的风险,并强调了在管道安装过程中保持较低θg的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信