Does Changing the Font Type Affect the Processing of Words Written in Cyrillic and Latin Alphabet?

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jovana Tešinović, Svetlana Borojević, Strahinja Dimitrijević
{"title":"Does Changing the Font Type Affect the Processing of Words Written in Cyrillic and Latin Alphabet?","authors":"Jovana Tešinović, Svetlana Borojević, Strahinja Dimitrijević","doi":"10.19090/pp.v15i2.2359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To understand the reading process, it is necessary to explore the mechanisms of visual word recognition. The basic level of that recognition is the processing of letters, their size and visual identity. The specificity of the Serbian language is characterized by the parallel use of two alphabetic systems – Latin and Cyrillic, which contain a number of common, but also their own unique letters. Since some of the differences between the fonts are based on visual specific aditions at the end of letter's lines, there is also a significant contribution of fonts in letter recognition and reading. The main goal of this study is to examine the effect of font type on the processing of Latin and Cyrillic words. The aim was also to examine the effect of letter degradation on the word processing in these two alphabetic systems. The study included two experiments with Latin and Cyrillic words written in lowercase and uppercase. Participants were 221 students from the University of Banja Luka. Three factors were varied in both experiments: alphabet, “visual availability” (which refers to the visibility of words after degradation), and font type. Two analyses were performed ANOVA by subject (F1 analysis) and ANOVA by item (F2 analysis). Results show that there is a main effect of visual availability on processing speed of words. Visual degradation has slowed reaction time, but this effect is not the same in Latin and Cyrillic words. Significant interaction of font and alphabet is confirmed only in F2 analysis, so these results have limited validity. This study also revealed differences between lowercase and uppercase. Degradation of lowercase was more detrimental that degradation of uppercase. The obtained results indicate that word processing in two alphabetic systems can be partly explained by the visual characteristics and grapheme structure of their letters.","PeriodicalId":43074,"journal":{"name":"Primenjena Psihologija","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primenjena Psihologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.v15i2.2359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To understand the reading process, it is necessary to explore the mechanisms of visual word recognition. The basic level of that recognition is the processing of letters, their size and visual identity. The specificity of the Serbian language is characterized by the parallel use of two alphabetic systems – Latin and Cyrillic, which contain a number of common, but also their own unique letters. Since some of the differences between the fonts are based on visual specific aditions at the end of letter's lines, there is also a significant contribution of fonts in letter recognition and reading. The main goal of this study is to examine the effect of font type on the processing of Latin and Cyrillic words. The aim was also to examine the effect of letter degradation on the word processing in these two alphabetic systems. The study included two experiments with Latin and Cyrillic words written in lowercase and uppercase. Participants were 221 students from the University of Banja Luka. Three factors were varied in both experiments: alphabet, “visual availability” (which refers to the visibility of words after degradation), and font type. Two analyses were performed ANOVA by subject (F1 analysis) and ANOVA by item (F2 analysis). Results show that there is a main effect of visual availability on processing speed of words. Visual degradation has slowed reaction time, but this effect is not the same in Latin and Cyrillic words. Significant interaction of font and alphabet is confirmed only in F2 analysis, so these results have limited validity. This study also revealed differences between lowercase and uppercase. Degradation of lowercase was more detrimental that degradation of uppercase. The obtained results indicate that word processing in two alphabetic systems can be partly explained by the visual characteristics and grapheme structure of their letters.
改变字体类型会影响西里尔字母和拉丁字母单词的处理吗?
为了理解阅读过程,有必要探索视觉单词识别的机制。这种识别的基本层面是对字母、字母大小和视觉特征的处理。塞尔维亚语的特点是同时使用两个字母系统——拉丁字母和西里尔字母,这两个字母包含许多常见的字母,但也有各自独特的字母。由于字体之间的一些差异是基于字母行末尾的视觉特定adions,因此字体在字母识别和阅读方面也有重要贡献。本研究的主要目的是检验字体类型对拉丁语和西里尔语单词处理的影响。研究的目的还在于考察字母退化对这两个字母系统中单词处理的影响。这项研究包括两个实验,分别使用小写和大写的拉丁语和西里尔语单词。参与者是来自巴尼亚卢卡大学的221名学生。两个实验中有三个因素不同:字母表、“视觉可用性”(指单词退化后的可见性)和字体类型。两项分析分别按受试者进行方差分析(F1分析)和按项目进行方差分析。结果表明,视觉可用性对词的处理速度有主要影响。视觉退化减缓了反应时间,但这种影响在拉丁语和西里尔语单词中并不相同。只有在F2分析中才能证实字体和字母表之间的显著交互作用,因此这些结果的有效性有限。这项研究还揭示了小写字母和大写字母之间的差异。小写字母的退化比大写字母的退化更有害。研究结果表明,两个字母系统中的文字处理可以部分地用它们字母的视觉特征和字形结构来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Primenjena Psihologija
Primenjena Psihologija PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology publishes original papers, brief communications, and review articles that deal with diverse areas of research in applied psychology including, but not limited to, organizational, social, educational, developmental, mental health, counseling, and sport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信