Physics-informed neural networks for modeling astrophysical shocks

IF 6.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
S. Moschou, Elliot Hicks, Rishi Parekh, Dhruv Mathew, Shoumik Majumdar, N. Vlahakis
{"title":"Physics-informed neural networks for modeling astrophysical shocks","authors":"S. Moschou, Elliot Hicks, Rishi Parekh, Dhruv Mathew, Shoumik Majumdar, N. Vlahakis","doi":"10.1088/2632-2153/acf116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are machine learning models that integrate data-based learning with partial differential equations (PDEs). In this work, for the first time we extend PINNs to model the numerically challenging case of astrophysical shock waves in the presence of a stellar gravitational field. Notably, PINNs suffer from competing losses during gradient descent that can lead to poor performance especially in physical setups involving multiple scales, which is the case for shocks in the gravitationally stratified solar atmosphere. We applied PINNs in three different setups ranging from modeling astrophysical shocks in cases with no or little data to data-intensive cases. Namely, we used PINNs (a) to determine the effective polytropic index controlling the heating mechanism of the space plasma within 1% error, (b) to quantitatively show that data assimilation is seamless in PINNs and small amounts of data can significantly increase the model’s accuracy, and (c) to solve the forward time-dependent problem for different temporal horizons. We addressed the poor performance of PINNs through an effective normalization approach by reformulating the fluid dynamics PDE system to absorb the gravity-caused variability. This led to a huge improvement in the overall model performance with the density accuracy improving between 2 and 16 times. Finally, we present a detailed critique on the strengths and drawbacks of PINNs in tackling realistic physical problems in astrophysics and conclude that PINNs can be a powerful complimentary modeling approach to classical fluid dynamics solvers.","PeriodicalId":33757,"journal":{"name":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/acf116","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are machine learning models that integrate data-based learning with partial differential equations (PDEs). In this work, for the first time we extend PINNs to model the numerically challenging case of astrophysical shock waves in the presence of a stellar gravitational field. Notably, PINNs suffer from competing losses during gradient descent that can lead to poor performance especially in physical setups involving multiple scales, which is the case for shocks in the gravitationally stratified solar atmosphere. We applied PINNs in three different setups ranging from modeling astrophysical shocks in cases with no or little data to data-intensive cases. Namely, we used PINNs (a) to determine the effective polytropic index controlling the heating mechanism of the space plasma within 1% error, (b) to quantitatively show that data assimilation is seamless in PINNs and small amounts of data can significantly increase the model’s accuracy, and (c) to solve the forward time-dependent problem for different temporal horizons. We addressed the poor performance of PINNs through an effective normalization approach by reformulating the fluid dynamics PDE system to absorb the gravity-caused variability. This led to a huge improvement in the overall model performance with the density accuracy improving between 2 and 16 times. Finally, we present a detailed critique on the strengths and drawbacks of PINNs in tackling realistic physical problems in astrophysics and conclude that PINNs can be a powerful complimentary modeling approach to classical fluid dynamics solvers.
用于模拟天体物理冲击的基于物理学的神经网络
物理信息神经网络(pinn)是将基于数据的学习与偏微分方程(PDEs)相结合的机器学习模型。在这项工作中,我们首次将pin扩展到在恒星引力场存在的情况下模拟具有数值挑战性的天体物理冲击波。值得注意的是,pinn在梯度下降过程中遭受竞争性损失,这可能导致性能不佳,特别是在涉及多尺度的物理设置中,这就是在引力分层的太阳大气中的冲击的情况。我们将pin应用于三种不同的设置,从没有或很少数据的情况下的天体物理冲击建模到数据密集的情况。即,我们利用pinn (a)确定了控制空间等离子体加热机制的有效多向指数,误差在1%以内;(b)定量证明了pinn的数据同化是无缝的,少量数据可以显著提高模型的精度;(c)解决了不同时间视界的前向时间依赖问题。我们通过一种有效的归一化方法,通过重新制定流体动力学PDE系统来吸收重力引起的变异性,解决了pinn性能差的问题。这导致了整体模型性能的巨大改善,密度精度提高了2到16倍。最后,我们对pinn在解决天体物理学中的实际物理问题方面的优势和缺点进行了详细的批评,并得出结论,pinn可以成为经典流体动力学求解器的强大补充建模方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Machine Learning Science and Technology Computer Science-Artificial Intelligence
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Machine Learning Science and Technology is a multidisciplinary open access journal that bridges the application of machine learning across the sciences with advances in machine learning methods and theory as motivated by physical insights. Specifically, articles must fall into one of the following categories: advance the state of machine learning-driven applications in the sciences or make conceptual, methodological or theoretical advances in machine learning with applications to, inspiration from, or motivated by scientific problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信