Use of Routine Leaching Fraction Testing to Guide Irrigation at a Container Nursery

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
J. Million, T. Yeager
{"title":"Use of Routine Leaching Fraction Testing to Guide Irrigation at a Container Nursery","authors":"J. Million, T. Yeager","doi":"10.24266/0738-2898-39.3.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Efficient irrigation during container plant production is difficult to achieve as irrigation is scheduled daily or multiple times per day to maintain an adequate supply of water in the limited substrate volume. Leaching fraction (container drainage/water applied) testing is one strategy to monitor and adjust irrigation to limit excessive container drainage. We compared an automated irrigation schedule based on routine leaching fraction testing and weather (LFI) with a nursery's traditional irrigation practice (TIP). Compared to TIP, LFI reduced water applied in four of five sprinkler-irrigated trials without a notable growth affect; LFI increased water applied in a fifth trial but plant growth was also increased. Compared to TIP, LFI reduced water applied in all three micro-irrigated trials but also reduced growth in one of the trials. LFI reduced water applied by an average of 21% [57.8 vs. 73.1 kL·ha−1· d−1 (15,300 gal/acre/day) or $3,000 ha−1yr−1 ($1,200/acre/year) at a pumping cost of $0.53/kL ($0.20/1000 gal). We concluded that the greater economic benefit of water savings was to provide increased capacity for additional production under consumptive water use limitations rather than to reduce the unit cost of production.\n Index words: automation, evapotranspiration, sprinkler, micro-irrigation, weather.\n Species used in this study: Leyland cypress, Cupressus × leylandii A.B. Jacks. and Dallim., Parson juniper, Juniperus squamata Gordon ‘Expansa Parsonii', crape myrtle, Lagerstroemia indica L. × fauriei Koehne ‘Natchez', Indian hawthorn, Raphiolepis indica (L.) Lindl., sweet viburnum, Viburnum odoratissimum Ker Gawl.","PeriodicalId":15780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental horticulture","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-39.3.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efficient irrigation during container plant production is difficult to achieve as irrigation is scheduled daily or multiple times per day to maintain an adequate supply of water in the limited substrate volume. Leaching fraction (container drainage/water applied) testing is one strategy to monitor and adjust irrigation to limit excessive container drainage. We compared an automated irrigation schedule based on routine leaching fraction testing and weather (LFI) with a nursery's traditional irrigation practice (TIP). Compared to TIP, LFI reduced water applied in four of five sprinkler-irrigated trials without a notable growth affect; LFI increased water applied in a fifth trial but plant growth was also increased. Compared to TIP, LFI reduced water applied in all three micro-irrigated trials but also reduced growth in one of the trials. LFI reduced water applied by an average of 21% [57.8 vs. 73.1 kL·ha−1· d−1 (15,300 gal/acre/day) or $3,000 ha−1yr−1 ($1,200/acre/year) at a pumping cost of $0.53/kL ($0.20/1000 gal). We concluded that the greater economic benefit of water savings was to provide increased capacity for additional production under consumptive water use limitations rather than to reduce the unit cost of production. Index words: automation, evapotranspiration, sprinkler, micro-irrigation, weather. Species used in this study: Leyland cypress, Cupressus × leylandii A.B. Jacks. and Dallim., Parson juniper, Juniperus squamata Gordon ‘Expansa Parsonii', crape myrtle, Lagerstroemia indica L. × fauriei Koehne ‘Natchez', Indian hawthorn, Raphiolepis indica (L.) Lindl., sweet viburnum, Viburnum odoratissimum Ker Gawl.
常规浸出率试验指导容器苗圃灌溉
在集装箱植物生产过程中,有效的灌溉是很难实现的,因为灌溉是每天或每天多次安排的,以在有限的基质体积中保持足够的水供应。浸出分数(容器排水/应用的水)测试是监测和调整灌溉以限制容器过度排水的一种策略。我们比较了基于常规浸出分数测试和天气(LFI)的自动灌溉计划与苗圃的传统灌溉实践(TIP)。与TIP相比,LFI在5个喷灌试验中有4个减少了用水量,但对生长没有显著影响;LFI增加了第五次试验的施水量,但也促进了植物生长。与TIP相比,LFI减少了所有三个微灌试验的用水量,但也减少了其中一个试验的生长。LFI平均减少了21%的用水量[57.8 vs. 73.1千升·ha - 1·d - 1(15,300加仑/英亩/天)或3,000公顷- 1年- 1(1,200美元/英亩/年)],泵送成本为0.53美元/千升(0.20美元/1000加仑)。我们的结论是,节水更大的经济效益是在消耗用水限制的情况下增加额外生产的能力,而不是降低单位生产成本。关键词:自动化,蒸散,洒水,微灌,天气。研究树种:利兰柏树(Leyland cypress)、利兰柏树(Cupressus × leylandii A.B. Jacks)。和Dallim。紫薇,紫薇,Lagerstroemia indica L. × fauriei Koehne ' Natchez',印度山楂,Raphiolepis indica (L.)采用。香荚豆荚,香荚豆荚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental horticulture
Journal of environmental horticulture Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信