Discrepancies in Open Access Fees within Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmaceutics Journals.

IF 3.1 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-29 DOI:10.34172/apb.2023.076
Rana M F Sammour, Aliasgar Shahiwala
{"title":"Discrepancies in Open Access Fees within Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmaceutics Journals.","authors":"Rana M F Sammour, Aliasgar Shahiwala","doi":"10.34172/apb.2023.076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modern science has been transformed by open access (OA) publishing levied a significant economic burden on the authors. This article analyzes the discrepancies among OA publication fees in pharmacology, toxicology, and pharmaceutics. The observations comprise 160 OA journals and their corresponding Q ranking, SJR, H index, impact factor, country, and cost of publication. The OA fees were found to depend on the quality matrices, which was unexpected. Differences in OA fees raise ethical questions as OA fees are meant to cover the publication charges by the publishers or generate more revenues by taking advantage of the authors' temptation to publish in high-impact journals. Despite our findings being based on limited sample size and belonging to a particular field (pharmacy), it will shed considerable light on the issue of discrepancies among APCs charged by OA journals.</p>","PeriodicalId":7256,"journal":{"name":"Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/apb.2023.076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern science has been transformed by open access (OA) publishing levied a significant economic burden on the authors. This article analyzes the discrepancies among OA publication fees in pharmacology, toxicology, and pharmaceutics. The observations comprise 160 OA journals and their corresponding Q ranking, SJR, H index, impact factor, country, and cost of publication. The OA fees were found to depend on the quality matrices, which was unexpected. Differences in OA fees raise ethical questions as OA fees are meant to cover the publication charges by the publishers or generate more revenues by taking advantage of the authors' temptation to publish in high-impact journals. Despite our findings being based on limited sample size and belonging to a particular field (pharmacy), it will shed considerable light on the issue of discrepancies among APCs charged by OA journals.

药理学、毒理学和药剂学期刊开放获取费用的差异
开放获取(OA)出版给作者带来了巨大的经济负担,从而改变了现代科学。根据Scimago的观点,本文分析了药理学、毒理学和药学学科领域OA费用之间的差异。观察结果包括160种OA期刊及其相应的Q排名、SJR、H指数、影响因素、国家和出版成本。OA费用取决于质量矩阵,而事实并非如此。OA费用的差异引发了道德问题,因为OA费用旨在支付出版商的出版费用,或通过利用作者在高影响力期刊上发表的诱惑来产生更多收入。尽管我们的研究结果是基于有限的样本量,并且属于特定的领域(药学),但它将对OA期刊收费的APC之间的差异问题提供相当多的线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin
Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信