The Potential Utility of Aripiprazole Augmentation for Major Depressive Disorder with Mixed Features Specifier: A Retrospective Study

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Changsu Han, Sheng-Min Wang, W. Bahk, Soo-Jung Lee, A. Patkar, P. Masand, C. Pae
{"title":"The Potential Utility of Aripiprazole Augmentation for Major Depressive Disorder with Mixed Features Specifier: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Changsu Han, Sheng-Min Wang, W. Bahk, Soo-Jung Lee, A. Patkar, P. Masand, C. Pae","doi":"10.9758/cpn.2019.17.4.495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective The present study aimed to observe potential benefit of aripiprazole augmentation in the treatment of major depressive disorder with mixed specifier (MDDM) in naturalistic treatment setting. Methods Data were collected from MDDM patients using a retrospective chart review for 8 weeks (week –8 and week 0) in routine practice. All patients were on current antidepressants upon starting of aripiprazole. Patients were treated without restriction of doses of aripiprazole. The primary endpoint was the mean change of Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores along with various secondary endpoint measures. Results In total 38 patients were analyzed. The changes of MADRS, Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-severity, Young Mania Rating Scale, Sheehan Disability Scale, and CGI-clinical benefit total scores from baseline to the endpoint were −7.1, −0.8, −4.9, −4.1, and −3.6, respectively (all p < 0.0001). At the endpoint, the responder and remitter rates by MADRS score criteria were approximately 32% and 21%, respectively. Conclusion The present findings have clearly shown the effectiveness and tolerability of aripiprazole augmentation for MDDM patients in routine practice. The present study warrants subsequent, adequately-powered, well-controlled studies for generalizability near future.","PeriodicalId":10420,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience","volume":"17 1","pages":"495 - 502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.2019.17.4.495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Objective The present study aimed to observe potential benefit of aripiprazole augmentation in the treatment of major depressive disorder with mixed specifier (MDDM) in naturalistic treatment setting. Methods Data were collected from MDDM patients using a retrospective chart review for 8 weeks (week –8 and week 0) in routine practice. All patients were on current antidepressants upon starting of aripiprazole. Patients were treated without restriction of doses of aripiprazole. The primary endpoint was the mean change of Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores along with various secondary endpoint measures. Results In total 38 patients were analyzed. The changes of MADRS, Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-severity, Young Mania Rating Scale, Sheehan Disability Scale, and CGI-clinical benefit total scores from baseline to the endpoint were −7.1, −0.8, −4.9, −4.1, and −3.6, respectively (all p < 0.0001). At the endpoint, the responder and remitter rates by MADRS score criteria were approximately 32% and 21%, respectively. Conclusion The present findings have clearly shown the effectiveness and tolerability of aripiprazole augmentation for MDDM patients in routine practice. The present study warrants subsequent, adequately-powered, well-controlled studies for generalizability near future.
阿立哌唑增强治疗混合型抑郁症的潜在效用:一项回顾性研究
目的本研究旨在观察阿立哌唑增强剂在自然治疗环境中治疗混合型严重抑郁障碍(MDDM)的潜在益处。方法在常规实践中,采用8周(第8周和第0周)的回顾性图表回顾法收集MDDM患者的数据。所有患者在开始服用阿立哌唑后均服用目前的抗抑郁药。患者在不限制阿立哌唑剂量的情况下接受治疗。主要终点是Montgomery–Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)总分的平均变化以及各种次要终点测量。结果对38例患者进行分析。MADRS、临床总体印象(CGI)-严重程度、青年躁狂评定量表、Sheehan残疾量表和CGI临床获益总分从基线到终点的变化分别为−7.1、−0.8、−4.9、−4.1和−3.6(均<0.0001)。终点时,根据MADRS评分标准,应答率和缓解率分别约为32%和21%。结论阿立哌唑强化治疗多发性糖尿病的疗效和耐受性在常规治疗中得到了明确的证明。本研究保证了在不久的将来进行后续的、充分有力的、控制良好的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCESPHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience (Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci) launched in 2003, is the official journal of The Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology (KCNP), and the associate journal for Asian College of Neuropsychopharmacology (AsCNP). This journal aims to publish evidence-based, scientifically written articles related to clinical and preclinical studies in the field of psychopharmacology and neuroscience. This journal intends to foster and encourage communications between psychiatrist, neuroscientist and all related experts in Asia as well as worldwide. It is published four times a year at the last day of February, May, August, and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信