QUESTION PREVIEW IN ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES LISTENING ASSESSMENT: THE EFFECT OF STEM PREVIEW ON DIFFICULTY, ITEM TYPE, AND DISCRIMINATION

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Rebecca Yeager, Zachary Meyer
{"title":"QUESTION PREVIEW IN ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES LISTENING ASSESSMENT: THE EFFECT OF STEM PREVIEW ON DIFFICULTY, ITEM TYPE, AND DISCRIMINATION","authors":"Rebecca Yeager, Zachary Meyer","doi":"10.1080/10904018.2022.2029705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigates the effects of adding stem preview to an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) multiple-choice listening assessment. In stem preview, listeners may view the item stems, but not response options, before listening. Previous research indicates that adding preview to an exam typically decreases difficulty, but raises concerns about score interpretation. Concerningly, no previous studies have explored the impact of preview on item discrimination, a key assumption of a validity argument. Our study utilized a Latin square design controlling for group, lecture, and preview condition to explore the impact of stem preview on difficulty, item type, and discrimination. Analysis indicated no significant effects of preview condition on difficulty or item type overall at our chosen alpha level. However, comparisons of total scores revealed a bimodal distribution in the no-preview condition, but not in the preview condition, indicating lower-scoring students received a boost from stem preview. Additionally, preview significantly increased facility on one of the trivial items. Results for discrimination were more complicated. On two of the five discrimination indices in the study, preview significantly decreased item discrimination, but for the other three indices, effects were not significant. Implications for assessment developers and researchers are discussed.","PeriodicalId":35114,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Listening","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Listening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2022.2029705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the effects of adding stem preview to an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) multiple-choice listening assessment. In stem preview, listeners may view the item stems, but not response options, before listening. Previous research indicates that adding preview to an exam typically decreases difficulty, but raises concerns about score interpretation. Concerningly, no previous studies have explored the impact of preview on item discrimination, a key assumption of a validity argument. Our study utilized a Latin square design controlling for group, lecture, and preview condition to explore the impact of stem preview on difficulty, item type, and discrimination. Analysis indicated no significant effects of preview condition on difficulty or item type overall at our chosen alpha level. However, comparisons of total scores revealed a bimodal distribution in the no-preview condition, but not in the preview condition, indicating lower-scoring students received a boost from stem preview. Additionally, preview significantly increased facility on one of the trivial items. Results for discrimination were more complicated. On two of the five discrimination indices in the study, preview significantly decreased item discrimination, but for the other three indices, effects were not significant. Implications for assessment developers and researchers are discussed.
学术英语中的问题预习听力评估:词干预习对难度、项目类型和辨别能力的影响
摘要:本研究探讨了在学术英语(EAP)多项选择听力测评中加入stem预习的效果。在主题预览中,听众可以在收听之前查看主题主题,但不能查看响应选项。先前的研究表明,在考试中加入预习通常会降低难度,但会引发对分数解释的担忧。值得关注的是,之前没有研究探讨过预览对项目歧视的影响,而项目歧视是效度论点的一个关键假设。本研究采用拉丁方设计,控制小组、讲座和预习条件,探讨预习对难度、项目类型和辨别力的影响。分析表明,在我们选择的alpha等级中,预览条件对难度或项目类型总体上没有显著影响。然而,在没有预习的情况下,总分的比较显示出双峰分布,而在预习的情况下则没有,这表明得分较低的学生从预习中得到了提升。此外,预览显著地增加了其中一个琐碎项目的功能。鉴别结果更为复杂。在5个辨别指标中的2个指标上,预习显著降低了项目辨别,而在其他3个指标上,效果不显著。讨论了对评估开发人员和研究人员的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Listening
International Journal of Listening Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信