So close, Yet So Far: Stopping Short of Killing Implicit Bias

IF 7.2 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Psychological Inquiry Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/1047840X.2022.2106753

Joseph Cesario

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors of the target article (Gawronski, Ledgerwood, & Eastwick, this issue) are to be commended for their important and insightful analysis on the state of implicit bias research. They introduce and discuss the critical distinction between bias on implicit measures and implicit bias itself. However, the authors want to have their cake and eat it too, and this causes them to stop short in fully applying their analysis. In this commentary, I take the authors seriously and draw out their analysis to its logical conclusion. In doing so, three points are raised:

查看原文本刊更多论文

如此接近，却又如此遥远：没有消除隐性偏见

目标文章的作者(本期Gawronski, Ledgerwood， & Eastwick)对内隐偏见研究现状进行了重要而深刻的分析，值得赞扬。他们介绍并讨论了内隐测量偏差和内隐偏差本身之间的关键区别。然而，作者想要鱼与熊掌兼得，这导致他们在充分应用他们的分析时突然停止。在这篇评论中，我认真对待作者，并将他们的分析归纳为合乎逻辑的结论。在这样做时，提出了三点:

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psychological Inquiry PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

10.30

自引率

1.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Psychological Inquiry serves as an international journal dedicated to the advancement of psychological theory. Each edition features an extensive target article exploring a controversial or provocative topic, accompanied by peer commentaries and a response from the target author(s). Proposals for target articles must be submitted using the Target Article Proposal Form, and only approved proposals undergo peer review by at least three reviewers. Authors are invited to submit their full articles after the proposal has received approval from the Editor.