Corporate social performanceand over-investment: evidence from Germany

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Florian Habermann
{"title":"Corporate social performanceand over-investment: evidence from Germany","authors":"Florian Habermann","doi":"10.1108/jgr-11-2020-0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nWith the Green Deal and Sustainable Finance Taxonomy, the European Union is driving forward its ambition for a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy. For this reason, this paper contributes to the ongoing discussion by examining how overall corporate social performance (CSP) and the respective environmental, social and governance (ESG) pillar performance affects corporate financial performance (CFP). In addition, this study aims to present novel insights by testing a theoretically derived CSP over-investment theory empirically for the German market.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe final sample includes firms listed on the German Prime Standard (DAX30, MDAX and TecDAX) from 2015 to 2019. The study includes a correlation and regression analysis using fixed effects on 363 firm-year observations to investigate the CSP-CFP relationship. This paper applies accounting and market-based CFP measures and uses Thomson Reuters (TR) ESG scores to measure CSP.\n\n\nFindings\nOverall CSP, social pillar and governance pillar performance improve CFP for firms listed on the German Prime Standard. However, the study provides evidence for a value-destroying effect of CSP over-investment in the social pillar.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe implications of the study are ambiguous. First, firms can improve CFP when doing good, i.e. increase CSP. Second, however, CSP is a concept of decreasing marginal benefits. Consequently, managers can respond to increasing pressure from investors to be “sustainable” with the argument of CSP over-investment. Policymakers must consider materiality as a potential explanation for the over-investment phenomena when framing sustainable development programs, i.e. the EU Green Deal and regulations such as the Directive 2014/95/EU and the Regulation EU 2020/852. Moreover, the study sensitizes society that sustainability efforts do not exclusively affect CFP positively.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper contributes to CSP literature by revisiting the CSP-CFP relationship and debuting a CSP over-investment hypothesis on the German market. The results are highly relevant for practitioners, policymakers and society, as the study provides an empirical framework to evaluate CSP properly and reveals the importance of materiality in stakeholder management.\n","PeriodicalId":45268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Responsibility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-11-2020-0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose With the Green Deal and Sustainable Finance Taxonomy, the European Union is driving forward its ambition for a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy. For this reason, this paper contributes to the ongoing discussion by examining how overall corporate social performance (CSP) and the respective environmental, social and governance (ESG) pillar performance affects corporate financial performance (CFP). In addition, this study aims to present novel insights by testing a theoretically derived CSP over-investment theory empirically for the German market. Design/methodology/approach The final sample includes firms listed on the German Prime Standard (DAX30, MDAX and TecDAX) from 2015 to 2019. The study includes a correlation and regression analysis using fixed effects on 363 firm-year observations to investigate the CSP-CFP relationship. This paper applies accounting and market-based CFP measures and uses Thomson Reuters (TR) ESG scores to measure CSP. Findings Overall CSP, social pillar and governance pillar performance improve CFP for firms listed on the German Prime Standard. However, the study provides evidence for a value-destroying effect of CSP over-investment in the social pillar. Research limitations/implications The implications of the study are ambiguous. First, firms can improve CFP when doing good, i.e. increase CSP. Second, however, CSP is a concept of decreasing marginal benefits. Consequently, managers can respond to increasing pressure from investors to be “sustainable” with the argument of CSP over-investment. Policymakers must consider materiality as a potential explanation for the over-investment phenomena when framing sustainable development programs, i.e. the EU Green Deal and regulations such as the Directive 2014/95/EU and the Regulation EU 2020/852. Moreover, the study sensitizes society that sustainability efforts do not exclusively affect CFP positively. Originality/value The paper contributes to CSP literature by revisiting the CSP-CFP relationship and debuting a CSP over-investment hypothesis on the German market. The results are highly relevant for practitioners, policymakers and society, as the study provides an empirical framework to evaluate CSP properly and reveals the importance of materiality in stakeholder management.
企业社会绩效与过度投资:来自德国的证据
目的通过绿色协议和可持续金融分类法,欧盟正在推进其建立现代、资源高效和竞争经济的雄心。因此,本文通过研究整体企业社会绩效(CSP)和各自的环境、社会和治理(ESG)支柱绩效如何影响企业财务绩效(CFP),为正在进行的讨论做出了贡献。此外,本研究旨在通过对德国市场的CSP投资过度理论进行实证检验,提供新的见解。设计/方法/方法最终样本包括2015年至2019年列入德国基本标准(DAX30、MDAX和TecDAX)的公司。该研究包括对363个公司年度观察结果的固定效应进行相关性和回归分析,以调查CSP-CFP关系。本文应用会计和基于市场的CFP指标,并使用汤森路透(TR)ESG评分来衡量CSP.Findings总体CSP、社会支柱和治理支柱绩效提高了德国基本标准上市公司的CFP。然而,该研究为CSP对社会支柱投资的价值破坏效应提供了证据。研究局限性/含义该研究的含义不明确。首先,企业可以在做好事的时候提高CFP,即提高CSP。然而,第二,CSP是一个边际效益递减的概念。因此,管理者可以通过CSP而非投资的论点来应对来自投资者的越来越大的“可持续”压力。政策制定者在制定可持续发展计划时,必须将实质性视为过度投资现象的潜在解释,即欧盟绿色协议和条例,如2014/95/EU指令和欧盟2020/852条例。此外,该研究使社会意识到,可持续性努力并不完全对CFP产生积极影响。原创性/价值本文通过重新审视CSP-CFP关系,并在德国市场上首次提出CSP过度投资假说,为CSP文献做出了贡献。研究结果与从业者、决策者和社会高度相关,因为该研究为正确评估CSP提供了一个经验框架,并揭示了实质性在利益相关者管理中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
22
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信