Is (actual or perceptual) personality similarity associated with attraction in initial romantic encounters? A dyadic response surface analysis

Sarah Humberg, Tanja M. Gerlach, Theresa Franke-Prasse, K. Geukes, M. Back
{"title":"Is (actual or perceptual) personality similarity associated with attraction in initial romantic encounters? A dyadic response surface analysis","authors":"Sarah Humberg, Tanja M. Gerlach, Theresa Franke-Prasse, K. Geukes, M. Back","doi":"10.5964/ps.7551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A central assumption in lay and psychological theories is that people are attracted to potential mates who are similar to themselves in personality traits. However, the empirical findings on this idea have been inconclusive. Only a few studies have considered real-life dating contexts, and the statistical approaches they applied have sometimes spuriously identified similarity effects. In our study, 397 heterosexual singles (aged 18–28) participated in real speed-dates (N_dates = 940). Using dyadic response surface analysis, we investigated effects of actual similarity (similarity between self-reported personality trait levels) and perceptual similarity (similarity between an actor’s personality and his/her perception of the partner’s personality) concerning the Big Five traits. Neither type of similarity was related to initial romantic attraction. That is, the empirical evidence contradicted the idea that attraction occurs when people’s personalities match. We conclude that understanding initial attraction requires a deeper understanding of interpersonal dynamics in first encounters.","PeriodicalId":74421,"journal":{"name":"Personality science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.7551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A central assumption in lay and psychological theories is that people are attracted to potential mates who are similar to themselves in personality traits. However, the empirical findings on this idea have been inconclusive. Only a few studies have considered real-life dating contexts, and the statistical approaches they applied have sometimes spuriously identified similarity effects. In our study, 397 heterosexual singles (aged 18–28) participated in real speed-dates (N_dates = 940). Using dyadic response surface analysis, we investigated effects of actual similarity (similarity between self-reported personality trait levels) and perceptual similarity (similarity between an actor’s personality and his/her perception of the partner’s personality) concerning the Big Five traits. Neither type of similarity was related to initial romantic attraction. That is, the empirical evidence contradicted the idea that attraction occurs when people’s personalities match. We conclude that understanding initial attraction requires a deeper understanding of interpersonal dynamics in first encounters.
在最初的浪漫邂逅中,(实际的或感性的)性格相似性与吸引力有关吗?二元响应面分析
非专业和心理学理论的一个中心假设是,人们会被与自己性格相似的潜在伴侣所吸引。然而,关于这一观点的实证研究结果尚无定论。只有少数研究考虑了现实生活中的约会背景,他们采用的统计方法有时会错误地识别出相似性效应。在我们的研究中,397名异性恋单身人士(18-28岁)参加了真实的速配约会(N_dates = 940)。利用二元反应面分析,我们研究了实际相似性(自我报告的人格特质水平之间的相似性)和感知相似性(演员的个性与他/她对伴侣个性的感知之间的相似性)对五大特征的影响。这两种相似性都与最初的浪漫吸引无关。也就是说,经验证据反驳了“当人们的个性匹配时,吸引力就会产生”的观点。我们的结论是,理解最初的吸引力需要更深入地理解初次相遇时的人际动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信