Efficacy and safety of huachansu capsules for the treatment of esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Meng-Meng Wang, Xinghui Zhang, Jun-Yan Wang, Jing Xua, Ming-zhu Chen, Shuyue Wang, M. Jia, Zhiping Shen, Ling Zhang, Y. Gong, Jian Gong
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of huachansu capsules for the treatment of esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Meng-Meng Wang, Xinghui Zhang, Jun-Yan Wang, Jing Xua, Ming-zhu Chen, Shuyue Wang, M. Jia, Zhiping Shen, Ling Zhang, Y. Gong, Jian Gong","doi":"10.4103/2311-8571.355009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Huachansu capsules in the treatment of esophageal cancer. We searched all relevant Chinese and English documents in the Cochrane Library Clinical Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, and VIP databases, from the time the databases were established to December 2020. The studies were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their quality was evaluated. We used RevMan 5.4 to conduct the meta-analysis of measurement indicators and intervention measures. Six randomized controlled trials comprising 526 patients with esophageal cancer were included in the study. Compared with radiotherapy and chemotherapy alone, oral Huachansu capsules combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy improved the clinical efficacy (risk ratio [RR] = 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17–1.55, P < 0.0001), quality of life (weighted mean difference [MD] = 10.01, 95% CI [3.39–16.64], P = 0.003), and immune level (CD3+: MD = 4.99, 95% CI [3.70–6.29], P < 0.0001; CD4+: MD = 6.49, 95% CI [5.55–7.42], P < 0.0001; CD5+: MD = 0.20, 95% CI [0.11–0.28], P < 0.0001), and reduced toxic and side effects (reductions in white blood cell count: RR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.44–0.90], P = 0.01; Reductions in blood platelet: RR = 0.70, 95% CI [0.52–0.94], P = 0.02; Gastrointestinal reaction: RR = 0.73, 95% CI [0.59–0.89], P = 0.002). However, the number of included studies was small, and conclusions still need to be further verified using larger samples and high-quality randomized, double-blind controlled trials.","PeriodicalId":23692,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2311-8571.355009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Huachansu capsules in the treatment of esophageal cancer. We searched all relevant Chinese and English documents in the Cochrane Library Clinical Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, and VIP databases, from the time the databases were established to December 2020. The studies were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their quality was evaluated. We used RevMan 5.4 to conduct the meta-analysis of measurement indicators and intervention measures. Six randomized controlled trials comprising 526 patients with esophageal cancer were included in the study. Compared with radiotherapy and chemotherapy alone, oral Huachansu capsules combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy improved the clinical efficacy (risk ratio [RR] = 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17–1.55, P < 0.0001), quality of life (weighted mean difference [MD] = 10.01, 95% CI [3.39–16.64], P = 0.003), and immune level (CD3+: MD = 4.99, 95% CI [3.70–6.29], P < 0.0001; CD4+: MD = 6.49, 95% CI [5.55–7.42], P < 0.0001; CD5+: MD = 0.20, 95% CI [0.11–0.28], P < 0.0001), and reduced toxic and side effects (reductions in white blood cell count: RR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.44–0.90], P = 0.01; Reductions in blood platelet: RR = 0.70, 95% CI [0.52–0.94], P = 0.02; Gastrointestinal reaction: RR = 0.73, 95% CI [0.59–0.89], P = 0.002). However, the number of included studies was small, and conclusions still need to be further verified using larger samples and high-quality randomized, double-blind controlled trials.
花蟾素胶囊治疗食管癌症的疗效和安全性:系统评价和meta分析
本研究旨在系统评价花蟾素胶囊治疗食管癌症的疗效和安全性。我们在Cochrane Library临床对照试验、PubMed、EMBASE、CNKI和VIP数据库中搜索了从数据库建立到2020年12月的所有相关中文和英文文件。根据纳入和排除标准选择研究,并对其质量进行评估。我们使用RevMan 5.4对测量指标和干预措施进行了荟萃分析。研究纳入了6项随机对照试验,包括526名癌症食管癌患者。与单纯放疗和化疗相比,口服华蟾素胶囊联合放疗和化疗改善了临床疗效(风险比[RR]=1.35,95%置信区间[CI],1.17-1.55,P<0.0001)、生活质量(加权平均差[MD]=10.01,95%CI[3.39-16.64],P=0.003),和免疫水平(CD3+:MD=4.99,95%CI[3.70–6.29],P<0.0001;CD4+:MD=6.49,95%CI[5.55–7.42],P=0.001;CD5+:MD=0.20,95%CI[0.11–0.28],P<0.0001),减少了毒副作用(白细胞计数减少:RR=0.63,95%CI[0.44–0.90],P=0.01;血小板减少:RR0.70,95%CI[0.52–0.94],P=0.02;胃肠道反应:RR=0.73,95%CI[0.59–0.89],P=0.002)。然而,纳入的研究数量很少,结论仍需使用更大的样本和高质量的随机、双盲对照试验进行进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信