Is There a Privacy Paradox in Digital Social Media Use? The Role of Privacy Concerns and Social Norms

Josephine Halama, Tina Frenzel, Laura Hofmann, Constanze Klose, Nathalie Seifert, Kathrin Telega, Franziska Bocklisch
{"title":"Is There a Privacy Paradox in Digital Social Media Use? The Role of Privacy Concerns and Social Norms","authors":"Josephine Halama, Tina Frenzel, Laura Hofmann, Constanze Klose, Nathalie Seifert, Kathrin Telega, Franziska Bocklisch","doi":"10.1515/psych-2022-0128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The phenomenon of the privacy paradox states that people are concerned about their data, but do not behave accordingly by avoiding disclosure of personal data, for instance, when using social media. Since findings about the influence of privacy concerns on privacy-related behavior are controversial, the present study investigates whether social norms or individual privacy concerns provide a better explanation of disclosure behavior. Therefore, a social media app dummy was developed and the social norm manipulated by altering the amount and the sensitivity of information provided in a fictitious app user profile. Regarding social norm factors, the results of the online experiment (N = 42) revealed that only the sensitivity of the data in the dummy profile demonstrated a medium effect on the amount of personal data given by the participants. Considering individual factors, the less concerned individuals were about their privacy, the higher were the amount and the degree of sensitivity of the personal information participants disclosed. In addition, participants differentiated between sensitive or non-sensitive information when disclosing their data. They disclosed sensitive information significantly less often, regardless of the dummy profile they saw. Altogether, the study results do not support the privacy paradox and demonstrate implications for media education.","PeriodicalId":74357,"journal":{"name":"Open psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2022-0128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The phenomenon of the privacy paradox states that people are concerned about their data, but do not behave accordingly by avoiding disclosure of personal data, for instance, when using social media. Since findings about the influence of privacy concerns on privacy-related behavior are controversial, the present study investigates whether social norms or individual privacy concerns provide a better explanation of disclosure behavior. Therefore, a social media app dummy was developed and the social norm manipulated by altering the amount and the sensitivity of information provided in a fictitious app user profile. Regarding social norm factors, the results of the online experiment (N = 42) revealed that only the sensitivity of the data in the dummy profile demonstrated a medium effect on the amount of personal data given by the participants. Considering individual factors, the less concerned individuals were about their privacy, the higher were the amount and the degree of sensitivity of the personal information participants disclosed. In addition, participants differentiated between sensitive or non-sensitive information when disclosing their data. They disclosed sensitive information significantly less often, regardless of the dummy profile they saw. Altogether, the study results do not support the privacy paradox and demonstrate implications for media education.
数字社交媒体的使用是否存在隐私悖论?隐私问题和社会规范的作用
摘要隐私悖论现象表明,人们关心自己的数据,但在使用社交媒体时,却没有相应地避免披露个人数据。由于隐私问题对隐私相关行为的影响存在争议,本研究调查了社会规范或个人隐私问题是否能更好地解释披露行为。因此,开发了一个社交媒体应用程序假人,并通过改变虚拟应用程序用户档案中提供的信息的数量和敏感性来操纵社会规范。关于社会规范因素,在线实验的结果(N=42)表明,只有虚拟档案中数据的敏感性对参与者提供的个人数据量有中等影响。考虑到个人因素,个人越不关心自己的隐私,参与者披露的个人信息的数量和敏感程度就越高。此外,参与者在披露数据时区分敏感信息和非敏感信息。他们披露敏感信息的频率明显降低,无论他们看到的是虚假的个人资料。总之,研究结果并不支持隐私悖论,并表明其对媒体教育的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信