What do participants learn at Group Relations conferences? A report on a conference series on the theme of authority, power, and justice

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Tracy Wallach
{"title":"What do participants learn at Group Relations conferences? A report on a conference series on the theme of authority, power, and justice","authors":"Tracy Wallach","doi":"10.33212/OSD.V19N1.2019.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports findings from evaluation research conducted from three conferences in the Authority, Power, and Justice: Leadership for Change series, convened annually from 2014 to 2016 at Boston College. The conferences have had similar structures and themes, with some slight variations. The highly diversified staff and membership has highlighted the themes of social identity, power, and justice in the conferences. Findings were consistent with prior research that participants do indeed learn at conferences. For both experienced and inexperienced conference members, the process of learning and meaning making is complex, relational, and evolves over time beyond the conference boundaries, and is idiosyncratic and variable. Learning can also occur at a steep cost. Recommendations are offered for enhancing learning and mitigating some of the factors that may interfere with learning. Suggestions involve re-thinking our notions of conference\nboundaries and the consulting stance, better integration of conference themes into conference structure, and integration of evaluation processes into conferences.","PeriodicalId":41413,"journal":{"name":"Organisational and Social Dynamics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organisational and Social Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33212/OSD.V19N1.2019.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article reports findings from evaluation research conducted from three conferences in the Authority, Power, and Justice: Leadership for Change series, convened annually from 2014 to 2016 at Boston College. The conferences have had similar structures and themes, with some slight variations. The highly diversified staff and membership has highlighted the themes of social identity, power, and justice in the conferences. Findings were consistent with prior research that participants do indeed learn at conferences. For both experienced and inexperienced conference members, the process of learning and meaning making is complex, relational, and evolves over time beyond the conference boundaries, and is idiosyncratic and variable. Learning can also occur at a steep cost. Recommendations are offered for enhancing learning and mitigating some of the factors that may interfere with learning. Suggestions involve re-thinking our notions of conference boundaries and the consulting stance, better integration of conference themes into conference structure, and integration of evaluation processes into conferences.
参与者在团体关系会议上学到了什么?关于权威、权力和正义主题系列会议的报告
本文报告了权威、权力和正义:领导力变革系列三次会议的评估研究结果,这些会议于2014年至2016年在波士顿学院每年召开一次。这些会议有类似的结构和主题,但有一些细微的变化。高度多样化的工作人员和成员在会议中突出了社会身份、权力和正义的主题。研究结果与之前的研究一致,即参与者确实在会议中学到了东西。对于有经验和没有经验的会议成员来说,学习和意义创造的过程是复杂的,相互关联的,并且随着时间的推移而发展,超出了会议的范围,并且是特殊的和可变的。学习也可能要付出高昂的代价。提出了加强学习和减轻一些可能干扰学习的因素的建议。建议包括重新思考我们对会议边界和咨询立场的概念,更好地将会议主题融入会议结构,以及将评估过程融入会议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Organisational and Social Dynamics
Organisational and Social Dynamics PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: O&SD aims to create a deeper understanding of organisational and social processes and their effects on individuals, and to provide a forum for both theoretical and applied papers addressing emerging issues in societies and organisations from a psycho-social perspective. The editors seek to sustain a creative tension between scientific rigour and popular appeal, by developing conversations with the professional and social scientific worlds and opening them to practitioners and reflective citizens everywhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信