A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF CALCULATIONS OF CURRENT EXPECTED CREDIT LOSSES (CECL) AT DYNAMIC CORPORATION

IF 1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
G. Barone, Casey J. McNellis, Ronald F. Premuroso
{"title":"A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF CALCULATIONS OF CURRENT EXPECTED CREDIT LOSSES (CECL) AT DYNAMIC CORPORATION","authors":"G. Barone, Casey J. McNellis, Ronald F. Premuroso","doi":"10.2308/issues-2020-042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a standards update on current expected credit losses (Accounting Standards Update 2016-13; FASB Codification® Topic 326).  While the update does not change the debits and credits associated with current expected credit losses (CECL), it does significantly change the calculations associated with estimates of current expected credit losses.  Additionally, given that most textbooks simply provide inputs for the calculations associated with estimates of current expected credit losses, most accounting curricula does not cover the most important changes found in the update.  This case provides students with a hypothetical situation in which to analyze and understand these issues.  Specifically, the case requires students to critically analyze a series of current expected credit loss calculations, research authoritative guidance, and conclude regarding the appropriateness of the calculations of the actors in the case.  Results indicate that students perceive significant practical learning opportunities from the case.","PeriodicalId":46324,"journal":{"name":"ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION","volume":"2017 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/issues-2020-042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a standards update on current expected credit losses (Accounting Standards Update 2016-13; FASB Codification® Topic 326).  While the update does not change the debits and credits associated with current expected credit losses (CECL), it does significantly change the calculations associated with estimates of current expected credit losses.  Additionally, given that most textbooks simply provide inputs for the calculations associated with estimates of current expected credit losses, most accounting curricula does not cover the most important changes found in the update.  This case provides students with a hypothetical situation in which to analyze and understand these issues.  Specifically, the case requires students to critically analyze a series of current expected credit loss calculations, research authoritative guidance, and conclude regarding the appropriateness of the calculations of the actors in the case.  Results indicate that students perceive significant practical learning opportunities from the case.
动态公司当前预期信用损失(cecl)计算的关键分析
2016年,财务会计准则委员会(FASB)发布了关于当前预期信贷损失的标准更新(2016-13年会计准则更新;FASB编目®主题326)。虽然更新不会改变与当前预期信贷损失(CECL)相关的借方和贷方,但它确实会显著改变与当前预计信贷损失估计相关的计算。此外,鉴于大多数教科书只是为与当前预期信贷损失估计相关的计算提供输入,大多数会计课程没有涵盖更新中发现的最重要的变化。这个案例为学生提供了一个假设的情境,让他们分析和理解这些问题。具体而言,该案例要求学生批判性地分析一系列当前预期的信用损失计算,研究权威指导,并就案例中参与者的计算的适当性得出结论。结果表明,学生从案例中感知到了重要的实践学习机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION
ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The mission of Issues in Accounting Education is to publish research, commentaries, instructional resources, and book reviews that assist accounting faculty in teaching and that address important issues in accounting education. The journal will consist of two major sections, “Research and Commentary” and “Instructional Resources”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信