The reintegration officers’ perspectives on offenders to be discharged from community supervision in Singapore

IF 0.6 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
J. Chan
{"title":"The reintegration officers’ perspectives on offenders to be discharged from community supervision in Singapore","authors":"J. Chan","doi":"10.1108/SC-08-2020-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to focus on the perspectives of correctional officers supervising young offenders on community supervision in Singapore.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study adopted a qualitative research framework, where attention was devoted to understanding the perspectives of eight reintegration officers, and what they perceived to have helped young offenders successfully discharged from community supervision.\n\n\nFindings\nThe five essential factors that emerged are compliance to supervision conditions, education and/or employment, ability to cope and efforts to change, support and environment. Each factor is defensible and had been substantiated by past research that incorporates evidence-based practice in correctional rehabilitation for offenders.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nDue to constraints imposed on the research timeline, the five factors identified do not take into account societal-level barriers such as stigma, discrimination and inequalities, which are important factors that can be further explored in subsequent studies.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nIn Singapore, there is no research study on the Reintegration Officers' perspectives on what they deemed as critical for offenders to be discharged from community supervision. Understanding these key factors may help to shape future research in determining supervisees’ readiness for discharge from community supervision in Singapore. This knowledge gained could further inform and bolster the correctional rehabilitation services provided by SPS and be further developed into a tool that can be used to systematically assess the readiness of offenders to be discharged from community supervision.\n","PeriodicalId":43879,"journal":{"name":"Safer Communities","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safer Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/SC-08-2020-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to focus on the perspectives of correctional officers supervising young offenders on community supervision in Singapore. Design/methodology/approach The study adopted a qualitative research framework, where attention was devoted to understanding the perspectives of eight reintegration officers, and what they perceived to have helped young offenders successfully discharged from community supervision. Findings The five essential factors that emerged are compliance to supervision conditions, education and/or employment, ability to cope and efforts to change, support and environment. Each factor is defensible and had been substantiated by past research that incorporates evidence-based practice in correctional rehabilitation for offenders. Research limitations/implications Due to constraints imposed on the research timeline, the five factors identified do not take into account societal-level barriers such as stigma, discrimination and inequalities, which are important factors that can be further explored in subsequent studies. Originality/value In Singapore, there is no research study on the Reintegration Officers' perspectives on what they deemed as critical for offenders to be discharged from community supervision. Understanding these key factors may help to shape future research in determining supervisees’ readiness for discharge from community supervision in Singapore. This knowledge gained could further inform and bolster the correctional rehabilitation services provided by SPS and be further developed into a tool that can be used to systematically assess the readiness of offenders to be discharged from community supervision.
新加坡重返社会官员对即将从社区监管中释放的罪犯的看法
目的本文旨在关注新加坡管教人员对青少年罪犯社区监督的看法。设计/方法/方法本研究采用了定性研究框架,重点了解了8名重返社会官员的观点,以及他们所认为的帮助年轻罪犯成功脱离社区监管的因素。发现出现的五个基本因素是遵守监督条件、教育和/或就业、应对能力和努力改变、支持和环境。每一个因素都是可以辩护的,并且已经被过去的研究所证实,该研究将循证实践纳入罪犯的教养康复中。研究限制/含义由于对研究时间线的限制,确定的五个因素没有考虑到社会层面的障碍,如污名、歧视和不平等,这些都是可以在后续研究中进一步探讨的重要因素。独创性/价值在新加坡,没有关于重返社会官员对他们认为对罪犯从社区监督中释放至关重要的观点的研究。了解这些关键因素可能有助于制定未来的研究,以确定被监管人是否准备好从新加坡的社区监管中出院。所获得的这些知识可以进一步为SPS提供的惩教康复服务提供信息和支持,并进一步发展成为一种工具,可用于系统评估罪犯是否准备好从社区监督中释放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safer Communities
Safer Communities CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信