Young Adults’ Pathways of Negating Harms and Pleasure Related to Recreational Poly-Drug Use: A Complex Balancing Act

{"title":"Young Adults’ Pathways of Negating Harms and Pleasure Related to Recreational Poly-Drug Use: A Complex Balancing Act","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jar.07.01.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This paper examines the drug use and harm reduction practices of a subset of young adults in the Greater London area who engage in recreational poly-drug use. It traces their complex relationships with three popular party drugs – MDMA/ ecstasy, cocaine, and alcohol – and explores the difficulties of balancing the harms and benefits within the context of situated poly-drug use practices. Method: Longitudinal qualitative interviews with 31 young adults, aged 22 to 25. Three phases of thematic, semi-structured interviews were conducted from February 2018 to April 2019. Results: This paper describes participants’ relationships to both MDMA and cocaine and the various ways they balance the risks and pleasures associated with these drugs. Participants appeared to succeed in balancing the two with MDMA, based largely on effective harm reduction messaging. With their cocaine use, however, we see a rise in challenges complicating this balancing act. Framed by ‘harm reduction from below,’ this paper shows that participants generally see cocaine’s adverse effects as less physically and mentally harmful than those of MDMA and this is reflected in their drug use choices. But the perception of cocaine’s relative safety has consequences, particularly when we consider the drug’s normalization and acceptability in spaces where it is frequently co-consumed with alcohol. In light of their consistent co-consumption of cocaine and alcohol, this pathway analysis suggests that participants’ efforts to reduce harm in one instance could create more harm and long-term negative effects in another. And as a result, participants struggle to bring the risk and pleasure of this co-consumption into balance. Conclusion: Further exploration on both young peoples’ evolving motivations of drug choice and use and on how young people navigate the nuances of balancing acts within their poly-drug use would be a helpful contribution to advancing field of harm reduction. An emphasis on the psychological and physical risks of the prevalent practice of co-consuming cocaine and alcohol are also encouraged.","PeriodicalId":92800,"journal":{"name":"Journal of addiction research (OPAST Group)","volume":"67 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of addiction research (OPAST Group)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jar.07.01.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This paper examines the drug use and harm reduction practices of a subset of young adults in the Greater London area who engage in recreational poly-drug use. It traces their complex relationships with three popular party drugs – MDMA/ ecstasy, cocaine, and alcohol – and explores the difficulties of balancing the harms and benefits within the context of situated poly-drug use practices. Method: Longitudinal qualitative interviews with 31 young adults, aged 22 to 25. Three phases of thematic, semi-structured interviews were conducted from February 2018 to April 2019. Results: This paper describes participants’ relationships to both MDMA and cocaine and the various ways they balance the risks and pleasures associated with these drugs. Participants appeared to succeed in balancing the two with MDMA, based largely on effective harm reduction messaging. With their cocaine use, however, we see a rise in challenges complicating this balancing act. Framed by ‘harm reduction from below,’ this paper shows that participants generally see cocaine’s adverse effects as less physically and mentally harmful than those of MDMA and this is reflected in their drug use choices. But the perception of cocaine’s relative safety has consequences, particularly when we consider the drug’s normalization and acceptability in spaces where it is frequently co-consumed with alcohol. In light of their consistent co-consumption of cocaine and alcohol, this pathway analysis suggests that participants’ efforts to reduce harm in one instance could create more harm and long-term negative effects in another. And as a result, participants struggle to bring the risk and pleasure of this co-consumption into balance. Conclusion: Further exploration on both young peoples’ evolving motivations of drug choice and use and on how young people navigate the nuances of balancing acts within their poly-drug use would be a helpful contribution to advancing field of harm reduction. An emphasis on the psychological and physical risks of the prevalent practice of co-consuming cocaine and alcohol are also encouraged.
年轻人否定与娱乐性多用途药物使用相关的伤害和快乐的途径:一种复杂的平衡行为
背景:本文研究了大伦敦地区一部分从事娱乐性多用途药物使用的年轻人的药物使用和减少伤害的做法。它追溯了它们与三种流行的派对毒品——摇头丸、可卡因和酒精——的复杂关系,并探讨了在情境多毒品使用实践中平衡危害和收益的困难。方法:对31名年龄在22-25岁之间的年轻人进行纵向定性访谈。2018年2月至2019年4月进行了三个阶段的主题半结构化访谈。结果:本文描述了参与者与MDMA和可卡因的关系,以及他们平衡与这些药物相关的风险和快乐的各种方式。参与者似乎在很大程度上基于有效的减少伤害信息,成功地用MDMA平衡了两者。然而,随着他们可卡因的使用,我们看到挑战的增加使这种平衡行为复杂化。这篇论文以“从下面减少伤害”为框架,表明参与者通常认为可卡因的不良影响比摇头丸对身体和精神的危害更小,这反映在他们的药物使用选择中。但对可卡因相对安全性的看法是有后果的,特别是当我们考虑到可卡因在经常与酒精共同消费的场所的正常化和可接受性时。鉴于他们一贯共同吸食可卡因和酒精,这一途径分析表明,参与者在一种情况下减少伤害的努力可能会在另一种情况中造成更多伤害和长期负面影响。因此,参与者努力平衡这种共同消费的风险和乐趣。结论:进一步探索年轻人选择和使用药物的不断演变的动机,以及年轻人如何在多种药物使用中把握平衡行为的细微差别,将有助于推动减少伤害领域的发展。还鼓励强调可卡因和酒精共同消费的普遍做法的心理和身体风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信