Personal and complex: The needs and experiences related to technology use for people living with dementia

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
J. Liddle, Peter Worthy, D. Frost, E. Taylor, Dubhglas Taylor, R. Beleno, Daniel Angus, Janet Wiles, A. Angwin
{"title":"Personal and complex: The needs and experiences related to technology use for people living with dementia","authors":"J. Liddle, Peter Worthy, D. Frost, E. Taylor, Dubhglas Taylor, R. Beleno, Daniel Angus, Janet Wiles, A. Angwin","doi":"10.1177/14713012221084521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background With increasing focus on living well with dementia, technology has been identified as having potential benefits for safety, independence and wellbeing. Despite a large growth in specialised technology development, there has been limited uptake. There is a need to understand the current use and needs related to technology for people living with dementia and their care partners (informal carers). Methods As part of a participatory design study, a qualitative inquiry into technology experiences and needs was undertaken within an interpretive description approach. A cross-disciplinary team including living experience experts (people living with dementia, unpaid care partners) was involved. Semi-structured interviews, including sharing technology locations and supports, were conducted, audio-recorded and transcribed. Key aspects of the technology use experience were constructed. Findings Thirteen people living with dementia and 21 care partners participated in the study. Two core aspects of technology use were identified: Lots of moving parts: the complex context, and A technology cycle: the use and non-use. The findings indicated that the context involved an individual configuration of multiple factors including the user, their technology identity, their supporters, the technology and the environment. The experience is underpinned by shifting foundations created by constantly changing technologies and user characteristics. The cycle of use and non-use identified the processes required to maintain technology engagement. Conclusion The use of technology for people living with dementia is complex and personal. Future technology development, policies and practices need to consider this complexity and the effort required to keep using technology to realise the benefits.","PeriodicalId":51413,"journal":{"name":"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice","volume":"12 10","pages":"1511 - 1531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012221084521","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background With increasing focus on living well with dementia, technology has been identified as having potential benefits for safety, independence and wellbeing. Despite a large growth in specialised technology development, there has been limited uptake. There is a need to understand the current use and needs related to technology for people living with dementia and their care partners (informal carers). Methods As part of a participatory design study, a qualitative inquiry into technology experiences and needs was undertaken within an interpretive description approach. A cross-disciplinary team including living experience experts (people living with dementia, unpaid care partners) was involved. Semi-structured interviews, including sharing technology locations and supports, were conducted, audio-recorded and transcribed. Key aspects of the technology use experience were constructed. Findings Thirteen people living with dementia and 21 care partners participated in the study. Two core aspects of technology use were identified: Lots of moving parts: the complex context, and A technology cycle: the use and non-use. The findings indicated that the context involved an individual configuration of multiple factors including the user, their technology identity, their supporters, the technology and the environment. The experience is underpinned by shifting foundations created by constantly changing technologies and user characteristics. The cycle of use and non-use identified the processes required to maintain technology engagement. Conclusion The use of technology for people living with dementia is complex and personal. Future technology development, policies and practices need to consider this complexity and the effort required to keep using technology to realise the benefits.
个人和复杂:痴呆症患者与技术使用相关的需求和经历
随着人们越来越关注痴呆症患者的生活,技术被认为在安全、独立和健康方面有潜在的好处。尽管专业技术的发展有了很大的增长,但吸收有限。有必要了解痴呆症患者及其护理伙伴(非正式护理人员)目前对技术的使用和需求。方法作为参与式设计研究的一部分,采用解释性描述方法对技术经验和需求进行定性调查。一个包括生活经验专家(痴呆症患者、无偿护理伙伴)在内的跨学科团队参与了研究。进行了半结构化访谈,包括分享技术地点和支持,并进行了录音和转录。构建了技术使用体验的关键方面。13名痴呆症患者和21名护理伙伴参与了这项研究。确定了技术使用的两个核心方面:许多活动部分:复杂的上下文,以及技术周期:使用和不使用。研究结果表明,环境涉及多种因素的个人配置,包括用户、他们的技术身份、他们的支持者、技术和环境。不断变化的技术和用户特征创造了不断变化的基础,从而支撑了这种体验。使用和不使用的周期确定了维持技术参与所需的过程。结论老年痴呆患者的技术应用是复杂的、个性化的。未来的技术发展、政策和实践需要考虑到这种复杂性,以及继续使用技术来实现利益所需的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Dementia acts as a major forum for social research of direct relevance to improving the quality of life and quality of care for people with dementia and their families. For the first time an international research journal is available for academics and practitioners that has as its primary paradigm the lived experience of dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信