The Extent of Capacity Loss Caused by Rainfall at Signalised Intersections

Q3 Social Sciences
J. Oyaro, J. Ben-Edigbe
{"title":"The Extent of Capacity Loss Caused by Rainfall at Signalised Intersections","authors":"J. Oyaro, J. Ben-Edigbe","doi":"10.2174/1874447802014010214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Even though their physical characteristics exert a constant influence on capacity and saturation flows, signalized intersections are fixed facilities not affected by rainfall. Whilst traffic conditions with varying effects can be regulated, rainfall conditions cannot be regulated but compensated for by warning drivers to reduce speed. Speed reduction has an impact on signalised intersection capacity, whilst signalised intersection capacity is a function of saturation flow, effective green, and cycle time. In this paper, a capacity loss is the differential percentage between ‘with and without’ rainfall scenario.\n \n \n \n The paper investigated the extent of capacity loss caused by rainfall at signalised intersections.\n \n \n \n In Durban, South Africa, rainfall data were collected, collated, and correlated with traffic data in a 'with and without' rainfall intensity study. Rainfall intensity was classified according to the rate of precipitation as follows; rainfall intensity(i): light rain (i <2.5mm/h); Moderate rain (2.5mm/h ≤ i < 10mm/h), and heavy rain (10 ≤ i ≤ 50mm/h) as prescribed by the World Meteorological Society.\n \n \n \n Empirical results show that rainfall intensity has an effect on road capacity at a signalised intersection. Generally, for the vehicles going straight, light rain caused a 4.25% capacity loss; moderate rain 9.18% while heavy rain caused an 11.53% capacity reduction. With right-turning vehicles, light rain caused 7.38% capacity loss; moderate rain caused 14.3%, while heavy rain accounted for 19.15% capacity reduction.\n \n \n \n The paper concluded that rainfall at signalised intersections would cause an anomalous capacity reduction. Since the database for the study is small, the paper advocates for further studies based on a broader database to include yellow interval time.\n","PeriodicalId":38631,"journal":{"name":"Open Transportation Journal","volume":"34 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Transportation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447802014010214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Even though their physical characteristics exert a constant influence on capacity and saturation flows, signalized intersections are fixed facilities not affected by rainfall. Whilst traffic conditions with varying effects can be regulated, rainfall conditions cannot be regulated but compensated for by warning drivers to reduce speed. Speed reduction has an impact on signalised intersection capacity, whilst signalised intersection capacity is a function of saturation flow, effective green, and cycle time. In this paper, a capacity loss is the differential percentage between ‘with and without’ rainfall scenario. The paper investigated the extent of capacity loss caused by rainfall at signalised intersections. In Durban, South Africa, rainfall data were collected, collated, and correlated with traffic data in a 'with and without' rainfall intensity study. Rainfall intensity was classified according to the rate of precipitation as follows; rainfall intensity(i): light rain (i <2.5mm/h); Moderate rain (2.5mm/h ≤ i < 10mm/h), and heavy rain (10 ≤ i ≤ 50mm/h) as prescribed by the World Meteorological Society. Empirical results show that rainfall intensity has an effect on road capacity at a signalised intersection. Generally, for the vehicles going straight, light rain caused a 4.25% capacity loss; moderate rain 9.18% while heavy rain caused an 11.53% capacity reduction. With right-turning vehicles, light rain caused 7.38% capacity loss; moderate rain caused 14.3%, while heavy rain accounted for 19.15% capacity reduction. The paper concluded that rainfall at signalised intersections would cause an anomalous capacity reduction. Since the database for the study is small, the paper advocates for further studies based on a broader database to include yellow interval time.
雨水在有信号路口造成的通行能力损失程度
尽管信号交叉口的物理特性对通行能力和饱和流量产生持续影响,但信号交叉口是不受降雨影响的固定设施。虽然可以调节影响不同的交通条件,但不能调节降雨条件,而是通过警告驾驶员减速来补偿。减速会影响信号交叉口的通行能力,而信号交叉口通行能力是饱和流量、有效绿化和循环时间的函数。在本文中,容量损失是“有和没有”降雨情景之间的差异百分比。本文研究了降雨对信号交叉口通行能力的影响。在南非德班,在一项“有无”降雨强度研究中,收集、整理了降雨数据,并将其与交通数据相关联。降雨强度根据降水率分类如下:;降雨强度(i):小雨(i<2.5mm/h);世界气象学会规定的中雨(2.5mm/h≤i<10mm/h)和大雨(10≤i≤50mm/h)。经验结果表明,降雨强度对信号交叉口的道路通行能力有影响。一般来说,对于直线行驶的车辆,小雨造成4.25%的容量损失;中雨9.18%,大雨11.53%。对于右转车辆,小雨造成7.38%的运力损失;中雨造成14.3%的容量减少,大雨造成19.15%的容量减少。该论文得出的结论是,信号交叉口的降雨会导致通行能力的异常下降。由于该研究的数据库很小,本文主张在更广泛的数据库基础上进行进一步研究,以包括黄色间隔时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Transportation Journal
Open Transportation Journal Social Sciences-Transportation
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信