{"title":"Sequential Intrathecal Injection of Hyperbaric and Isobaric Bupivacaine in Orthogeriatric Lower Limb Surgery, a Prospective Randomized Study.","authors":"A. Alrefaey, Sherine A Bakrey","doi":"10.6859/aja.202204/PP.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe hemodynamic consequences of sympathetic blockade under spinal anesthesia remains a major concern especially in elderly frail patients. The baricity of the injected solution remains the principal factor controlling the diffusion of spinal anesthetics and the resulting sympathetic blockade. In this study, the sequential administration of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine (HB) is evaluated regarding the incidence of hypotension during orthogeriatric surgery.\n\n\nMETHODS\nFifty elderly patients (age > 60), scheduled for lower limb orthopedic surgery were randomly divided into two groups. In group HIB (n = 25), sequential injection of two syringes, 1.5 mL of 0.5% HB with 15 μ of fentanyl was injected, followed immediately by 1.5 mL of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine, and in group HB (n = 25), 3 mL of 0.5% HB mixed with 15 μ of fentanyl citrate (0.3 mL of fentanyl 50 μg/mL) were used for spinal anesthesia.\n\n\nRESULTS\nNo statistical difference was found between the two groups regarding patient demographics, comorbidities, or preoperative laboratory data. The absolute incidence of hypotension (16% vs. 44%, P = 0.03) was statistically lower in the HIB group than the HB group. Also, the total number of hypotensive episodes and the need for vasopressor medications were statistically lower in the HIB group than the HB group (P = 0.02 vs. P = 0.01).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur results show a better hemodynamic profile of the sequentially injected mixture with a lower incidence of intraoperative hypotension and subsequent lower vasopressor requirements.","PeriodicalId":8482,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202204/PP.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The hemodynamic consequences of sympathetic blockade under spinal anesthesia remains a major concern especially in elderly frail patients. The baricity of the injected solution remains the principal factor controlling the diffusion of spinal anesthetics and the resulting sympathetic blockade. In this study, the sequential administration of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine (HB) is evaluated regarding the incidence of hypotension during orthogeriatric surgery.
METHODS
Fifty elderly patients (age > 60), scheduled for lower limb orthopedic surgery were randomly divided into two groups. In group HIB (n = 25), sequential injection of two syringes, 1.5 mL of 0.5% HB with 15 μ of fentanyl was injected, followed immediately by 1.5 mL of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine, and in group HB (n = 25), 3 mL of 0.5% HB mixed with 15 μ of fentanyl citrate (0.3 mL of fentanyl 50 μg/mL) were used for spinal anesthesia.
RESULTS
No statistical difference was found between the two groups regarding patient demographics, comorbidities, or preoperative laboratory data. The absolute incidence of hypotension (16% vs. 44%, P = 0.03) was statistically lower in the HIB group than the HB group. Also, the total number of hypotensive episodes and the need for vasopressor medications were statistically lower in the HIB group than the HB group (P = 0.02 vs. P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
Our results show a better hemodynamic profile of the sequentially injected mixture with a lower incidence of intraoperative hypotension and subsequent lower vasopressor requirements.
期刊介绍:
Asian Journal of Anesthesiology (AJA), launched in 1962, is the official and peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Society of Anaesthesiologists. It is published quarterly (March/June/September/December) by Airiti and indexed in EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases. AJA accepts submissions from around the world. AJA is the premier open access journal in the field of anaesthesia and its related disciplines of critical care and pain in Asia. The number of Chinese anaesthesiologists has reached more than 60,000 and is still growing. The journal aims to disseminate anaesthesiology research and services for the Chinese community and is now the main anaesthesiology journal for Chinese societies located in Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. AJAcaters to clinicians of all relevant specialties and biomedical scientists working in the areas of anesthesia, critical care medicine and pain management, as well as other related fields (pharmacology, pathology molecular biology, etc). AJA''s editorial team is composed of local and regional experts in the field as well as many leading international experts. Article types accepted include review articles, research papers, short communication, correspondence and images.