Differences in ungulate population use in different hunting ground units in Lithuania

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 FORESTRY
Baltic Forestry Pub Date : 2020-12-19 DOI:10.46490/BF514
Tomas Barkauskas, O. Belova, L. Griciuvienė
{"title":"Differences in ungulate population use in different hunting ground units in Lithuania","authors":"Tomas Barkauskas, O. Belova, L. Griciuvienė","doi":"10.46490/BF514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abundant ungulate populations are considered ecosystem drivers that affect forestry and agriculture. Their management is ecologically and economically based on game density regulations, considering the balance between density and carrying capacity of the territory, population status and dynamics, as well as hunting needs. \nAlthough the population status and dynamics are not new questions, it is still unclear how to manage populations properly depending on the hunting intensity. We aimed to analyse and compare the ungulate population status like moose, red deer, roe deer and wild boar in the Punia pine forest, where the commercial hunting is conducted, and in the hunting grounds managed by hunter clubs in Prienai forest. We performed the study during four hunting seasons of 2009-2010, 2010-2011, 2011-2012, and 2012-2013. The data on harvesting and abundance were obtained from the field works and using the official statistics of the Ministry of Environment. \nThe moose local populations are not abundant, or animals occur occasionally, and their density does not reach the minimum permissible rate. At the same time within the study area, moose hunting is remained to be insufficient. The red deer population is rather stable in the hunting grounds used by hunter clubs while hardly reaches the minimum density rate. On the commercial hunting area, the population density 2-3 times exceeds the permissible density rate. The red deer population should be harvested more intensively. The wild boar is used intensively in the grounds of hunter clubs, while animal density is close to the permissible rate. Unfortunately, on the areas of commercial hunting, wild boar is not actively managed that is why their density exceeds permissible rate even four times. \nThe main harvested species are red deer and wild boar in both hunting grounds. Their abundant populations stay close to permissible density rate. However, gamekeepers keep the larger animal numbers on the areas of commercial hunting. As the main aim is the trophy hunting, the stags and boars are most used when compared to females and young. Therefore, on the areas of commercial hunting, use of wild boar and red deer is unreasonable and their density exceeds permissible rate several times. Keywords: commercial hunting, hunting clubs, population, status, ungulate","PeriodicalId":55404,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Forestry","volume":"420 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46490/BF514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abundant ungulate populations are considered ecosystem drivers that affect forestry and agriculture. Their management is ecologically and economically based on game density regulations, considering the balance between density and carrying capacity of the territory, population status and dynamics, as well as hunting needs. Although the population status and dynamics are not new questions, it is still unclear how to manage populations properly depending on the hunting intensity. We aimed to analyse and compare the ungulate population status like moose, red deer, roe deer and wild boar in the Punia pine forest, where the commercial hunting is conducted, and in the hunting grounds managed by hunter clubs in Prienai forest. We performed the study during four hunting seasons of 2009-2010, 2010-2011, 2011-2012, and 2012-2013. The data on harvesting and abundance were obtained from the field works and using the official statistics of the Ministry of Environment. The moose local populations are not abundant, or animals occur occasionally, and their density does not reach the minimum permissible rate. At the same time within the study area, moose hunting is remained to be insufficient. The red deer population is rather stable in the hunting grounds used by hunter clubs while hardly reaches the minimum density rate. On the commercial hunting area, the population density 2-3 times exceeds the permissible density rate. The red deer population should be harvested more intensively. The wild boar is used intensively in the grounds of hunter clubs, while animal density is close to the permissible rate. Unfortunately, on the areas of commercial hunting, wild boar is not actively managed that is why their density exceeds permissible rate even four times. The main harvested species are red deer and wild boar in both hunting grounds. Their abundant populations stay close to permissible density rate. However, gamekeepers keep the larger animal numbers on the areas of commercial hunting. As the main aim is the trophy hunting, the stags and boars are most used when compared to females and young. Therefore, on the areas of commercial hunting, use of wild boar and red deer is unreasonable and their density exceeds permissible rate several times. Keywords: commercial hunting, hunting clubs, population, status, ungulate
立陶宛不同狩猎场单位有蹄类动物种群使用的差异
丰富的有蹄类种群被认为是影响林业和农业的生态系统驱动因素。它们的管理在生态和经济上基于狩猎密度规定,考虑到密度和领土承载能力、人口状况和动态以及狩猎需求之间的平衡。尽管种群状况和动态并不是什么新问题,但如何根据狩猎强度正确管理种群仍不清楚。我们旨在分析和比较在进行商业狩猎的普尼亚松林和普里奈森林猎人俱乐部管理的狩猎场中,驼鹿、马鹿、獐和野猪等有蹄类种群的状况。我们在2009-2010年、2010-2011年、2011-2012年和2012-2013年的四个狩猎季节进行了这项研究。关于收获和丰度的数据是从实地工作中获得的,并使用了环境部的官方统计数据。当地驼鹿种群数量不多,或动物偶尔出现,密度未达到最低允许率。与此同时,在研究区域内,驼鹿狩猎仍然不够。在猎人俱乐部使用的狩猎场中,马鹿的数量相当稳定,但几乎没有达到最低密度。在商业狩猎区,种群密度是允许密度的2-3倍。应该更集中地收割马鹿种群。野猪在狩猎俱乐部的场地上被密集使用,而动物密度接近允许的比率。不幸的是,在商业狩猎区,野猪没有得到积极的管理,这就是为什么它们的密度甚至超过了允许率的四倍。这两个狩猎场的主要收获物种是马鹿和野猪。它们丰富的种群数量接近允许的密度率。然而,猎场管理员在商业狩猎区保留了大量的动物。由于狩猎的主要目的是狩猎战利品,与雌性和幼年相比,雄鹿和公猪最为常见。因此,在商业狩猎区,使用野猪和马鹿是不合理的,它们的密度超过了允许的比率好几倍。关键词:商业狩猎、狩猎俱乐部、种群、地位、有蹄类
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Baltic Forestry
Baltic Forestry 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes the original articles as well as short reports, review papers on forestry and forest science throughout the Baltic Sea region and elsewhere in the area of boreal and temperate forests. The Baltic Sea region is rather unique through its intrinsic environment and distinguished geographical and social conditions. A temperate climate, transitional and continental, has influenced formation of the mixed coniferous and deciduous stands of high productivity and biological diversity. The forest science has been affected by the ideas from both the East and West. In 1995, Forest Research Institutes and Universities from Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania joined their efforts to publish BALTIC FORESTRY.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信