Improving the accuracy of models to map alpine grassland above-ground biomass using Google earth engine

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Yan Shi, Jay Gao, Gary Brierley, Xilai Li, George L. W. Perry, Tingting Xu
{"title":"Improving the accuracy of models to map alpine grassland above-ground biomass using Google earth engine","authors":"Yan Shi,&nbsp;Jay Gao,&nbsp;Gary Brierley,&nbsp;Xilai Li,&nbsp;George L. W. Perry,&nbsp;Tingting Xu","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate modelling and mapping of alpine grassland aboveground biomass (AGB) are crucial for pastoral agriculture planning and management on the Qinghai Tibet Plateau (QTP). This study assessed the effectiveness of four popular models (traditional multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), and deep neural network (DNN)) with various input combinations (geospatial variables [GV], vegetation types [VT], field measurements [FM], meteorological variables [MV] and observation time [OT]) for AGB estimation based on a new framework for AGB modelling and mapping using Google Earth Engine. The results showed that the input feature of GV had a poor performance in AGB estimation (0.121 &lt; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> &lt; 0.591). FM improved the accuracy the most when incorporated with GV (0.815 &lt; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> &lt; 0.833). Although MV, VT and OT improved the accuracy (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) only by 0.112–0.216 with an importance rank order of MV &gt; VT &gt; OT for machine learning models, their outputs could be used to map AGB. Grass AGB was less accurately predicted than shrub AGB, but the pooling of both VTs improved estimation accuracy (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) by 0.171–0.269. The performance of the models followed the ranked order of DNN &gt; ANN &gt; SVM &gt; MLR. DNN had the highest accuracy (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.818) using all non-field measured variables (excluding FM) as the inputs, and it was successfully applied to a new dataset (not associated with the data used in the training and testing) with a <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.676. This study presents an effective and operational framework for modelling and mapping grassland AGB. Accordingly, it provides the scientific foundations to determine of sustainable grazing carrying capacity in alpine grasslands.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.12607","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12607","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Accurate modelling and mapping of alpine grassland aboveground biomass (AGB) are crucial for pastoral agriculture planning and management on the Qinghai Tibet Plateau (QTP). This study assessed the effectiveness of four popular models (traditional multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), and deep neural network (DNN)) with various input combinations (geospatial variables [GV], vegetation types [VT], field measurements [FM], meteorological variables [MV] and observation time [OT]) for AGB estimation based on a new framework for AGB modelling and mapping using Google Earth Engine. The results showed that the input feature of GV had a poor performance in AGB estimation (0.121 < R2 < 0.591). FM improved the accuracy the most when incorporated with GV (0.815 < R2 < 0.833). Although MV, VT and OT improved the accuracy (R2) only by 0.112–0.216 with an importance rank order of MV > VT > OT for machine learning models, their outputs could be used to map AGB. Grass AGB was less accurately predicted than shrub AGB, but the pooling of both VTs improved estimation accuracy (R2) by 0.171–0.269. The performance of the models followed the ranked order of DNN > ANN > SVM > MLR. DNN had the highest accuracy (R2 = 0.818) using all non-field measured variables (excluding FM) as the inputs, and it was successfully applied to a new dataset (not associated with the data used in the training and testing) with a R2 of 0.676. This study presents an effective and operational framework for modelling and mapping grassland AGB. Accordingly, it provides the scientific foundations to determine of sustainable grazing carrying capacity in alpine grasslands.

Abstract Image

利用谷歌earth engine提高高寒草地地上生物量模型的精度
高寒草地地上生物量(AGB)的准确建模与制图对青藏高原农牧农业规划与管理具有重要意义。基于基于Google Earth Engine的AGB建模和映射新框架,本研究评估了四种常用模型(传统多元线性回归(MLR)、支持向量机(SVM)、人工神经网络(ANN)和深度神经网络(DNN))在不同输入组合(地理空间变量[GV]、植被类型[VT]、野外测量值[FM]、气象变量[MV]和观测时间[OT])下对AGB估计的有效性。结果表明,GV的输入特征在AGB估计中表现较差(0.121 < R2 < 0.591)。FM与GV结合时,精度提高幅度最大(R2 < 0.833)。虽然MV, VT和OT对机器学习模型的精度(R2)仅提高了0.112-0.216,并且重要性等级为MV > VT > OT,但它们的输出可以用于映射AGB。禾草AGB的预测精度低于灌木AGB,但两种VTs池化的估计精度(R2)提高了0.171 ~ 0.269。模型的性能遵循DNN > ANN > SVM > MLR的排序顺序。使用所有非现场测量变量(不包括FM)作为输入,深度神经网络具有最高的准确性(R2 = 0.818),并且它成功地应用于新数据集(与训练和测试中使用的数据不相关),R2为0.676。本研究提出了一个有效的、可操作的草地AGB建模和制图框架。为确定高寒草原可持续放牧承载力提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信