Évaluation-Cognition-Polyhandicap (ECP) : apports d’une approche qualitative dans l’élaboration et la validation d’un outil

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A.-L. Poujol , A. Boissel , D. Guédon , N. Guénolé , D. Mellier , R. Scelles
{"title":"Évaluation-Cognition-Polyhandicap (ECP) : apports d’une approche qualitative dans l’élaboration et la validation d’un outil","authors":"A.-L. Poujol ,&nbsp;A. Boissel ,&nbsp;D. Guédon ,&nbsp;N. Guénolé ,&nbsp;D. Mellier ,&nbsp;R. Scelles","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2020.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Setting up a personalised project for any person with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) requires an evaluation of their cognitive skills. Nevertheless an international literature review highlights: a lack of adequate tools for evaluation of the cognitive skills of people with PIMD; the need to create standardised protocols. In 2009, Scelles et al. proposed the P2CJP–Profil de Compétences Cognitives du Jeune Polyhandicapé. This tool was designed for children up to 14 years of age. In 2017, this scale has been revised and extended to the adults, and called ECP (Evaluation-Cognition-PIMD).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>To elaborate and validate this tool, a statistical methodology has been combined with a qualitative process close to professionals and parents. The aim was to assess the relevance and the ergonomic of the ECP, the comprehension of items, the facility of use, the guideline and at least the effects regarding the practice.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The qualitative analyse of user backgrounds, at all validation stages, let adapt the ECP as well on the content as on the form. This work reveals the necessity to continue to adapt the ECP through interactions between users and searchers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44717,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie Francaise","volume":"66 3","pages":"Pages 207-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.psfr.2020.09.003","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie Francaise","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298420300455","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background

Setting up a personalised project for any person with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) requires an evaluation of their cognitive skills. Nevertheless an international literature review highlights: a lack of adequate tools for evaluation of the cognitive skills of people with PIMD; the need to create standardised protocols. In 2009, Scelles et al. proposed the P2CJP–Profil de Compétences Cognitives du Jeune Polyhandicapé. This tool was designed for children up to 14 years of age. In 2017, this scale has been revised and extended to the adults, and called ECP (Evaluation-Cognition-PIMD).

Method

To elaborate and validate this tool, a statistical methodology has been combined with a qualitative process close to professionals and parents. The aim was to assess the relevance and the ergonomic of the ECP, the comprehension of items, the facility of use, the guideline and at least the effects regarding the practice.

Results

The qualitative analyse of user backgrounds, at all validation stages, let adapt the ECP as well on the content as on the form. This work reveals the necessity to continue to adapt the ECP through interactions between users and searchers.

评估-认知-多重障碍(ECP):定性方法对工具开发和验证的贡献
背景为任何有深度智力和多重残疾(PIMD)的人建立一个个性化的项目需要对他们的认知技能进行评估。然而,一项国际文献综述强调:缺乏适当的工具来评估PIMD患者的认知技能;需要建立标准化的协议。2009年,Scelles等人提出了p2cjp - profile comp tences Cognitives du Jeune polyhandicap。这个工具是为14岁以下的儿童设计的。2017年,该量表被修订并扩展到成人,并称为ECP(评估-认知- pimd)。方法为了详细阐述和验证该工具,统计方法与专业人员和家长的定性过程相结合。目的是评估ECP的相关性和人体工程学、对项目的理解、使用的便利、指导方针以及至少对实践的影响。结果用户背景的定性分析,在所有验证阶段,让适应ECP的内容和形式。这项工作揭示了通过用户和搜索者之间的交互继续调整ECP的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychologie Francaise
Psychologie Francaise PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Psychologie française is the official organ of Société française de psychologie. It publishes original articles, most of the time within thematic issues. Considered as a reference publication, which covers all fields of psychology, its contents are used for tuition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信