Surgery in Intracerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: The Role of Preoperative Embolization.

Mahmut Ozden, Koral Erdogan, Melih Bozkurt
{"title":"Surgery in Intracerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: The Role of Preoperative Embolization.","authors":"Mahmut Ozden,&nbsp;Koral Erdogan,&nbsp;Melih Bozkurt","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.44032-23.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the outcomes of microsurgery only versus combined microsurgery and embolization in treating cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 62 patients (34 male and 28 female) with Spetzler-Martin grade 3 (n=44) and grade 4 (n=18) AVMs were examined. Thirty-seven patients were treated with a combination of microsurgery + embolization, whereas 25 patients were treated with microsurgery alone. The clinical characteristics of the treatment groups were compared (ruptured/unruptured, eloquent/non-eloquent, modified Rankin scores, duration of surgery, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, and use of blood products).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of patients with ruptured or eloquently localized AVMs was more in combination of microsurgery + embolization. On the other hand, the duration, preoperative versus postoperative hemoglobin levels, and usage of blood products did not differ between treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the study showed no superiority of the combined treatment in managing AVMs in parallel to recent meta-analyses. However, a patient-tailored approach is recommended while making the treatment decision for such challenging intracerebral AVM cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.44032-23.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To examine the outcomes of microsurgery only versus combined microsurgery and embolization in treating cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM).

Material and methods: A total of 62 patients (34 male and 28 female) with Spetzler-Martin grade 3 (n=44) and grade 4 (n=18) AVMs were examined. Thirty-seven patients were treated with a combination of microsurgery + embolization, whereas 25 patients were treated with microsurgery alone. The clinical characteristics of the treatment groups were compared (ruptured/unruptured, eloquent/non-eloquent, modified Rankin scores, duration of surgery, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, and use of blood products).

Results: The number of patients with ruptured or eloquently localized AVMs was more in combination of microsurgery + embolization. On the other hand, the duration, preoperative versus postoperative hemoglobin levels, and usage of blood products did not differ between treatment groups.

Conclusion: The results of the study showed no superiority of the combined treatment in managing AVMs in parallel to recent meta-analyses. However, a patient-tailored approach is recommended while making the treatment decision for such challenging intracerebral AVM cases.

脑动静脉畸形的外科治疗:术前栓塞的作用。
目的:脑动静脉畸形(AVMs)的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。显微外科手术和血管内栓塞可以单独使用,也可以组合使用。然而,每一种模式都有其自身的风险。在本研究中,我们比较了单纯显微外科手术与显微外科+栓塞联合治疗动静脉畸形的结果。材料和方法:共招募了62名患者(34名男性,28名女性),他们患有Spetzler&Martin 3级(n=44)和4级(n=18)动静脉畸形。其中显微外科+栓塞联合治疗37例,单纯显微外科治疗25例。比较了他们的临床特征(破裂/未破裂、口才、改良兰金评分、手术持续时间、术前和术后血红蛋白水平、血液制品的使用)。结果:采用联合入路治疗的AVM破裂或明显局限的患者数量较多。手术持续时间、术前和术后血红蛋白水平以及血液制品的使用在联合入路和单独显微外科之间没有差异。结论:由于存在深静脉引流或病灶大小,定位明确的AVMs可能具有更高的手术风险,因此更优选联合治疗。联合入路与单一入路选择的其他差异与病变解剖生理学无关。相反,我们认为联合治疗在我们最初的临床实践中更合适,并相应地规划了我们的临床策略。尽管如此,现在,与最近的荟萃分析相比,我们没有发现联合治疗在AVMs管理方面的优越性。因此,在AVMs的治疗中,手术前栓塞通常是不可取的,但在患者定制的方法中应考虑一些例外情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信