Suspected Accidental Infiltration of Rocuronium During General Anesthesia Induction: A Case Report.

Yuya Sakurai, Makiko Shibuya, Ryuichi Okiji, Yuri Hase, Takayuki Hojo, Yukifumi Kimura, Toshiaki Fujisawa
{"title":"Suspected Accidental Infiltration of Rocuronium During General Anesthesia Induction: A Case Report.","authors":"Yuya Sakurai, Makiko Shibuya, Ryuichi Okiji, Yuri Hase, Takayuki Hojo, Yukifumi Kimura, Toshiaki Fujisawa","doi":"10.2344/anpr-70-02-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are few reports on rocuronium infiltration under general anesthesia. We report a case of suspected accidental rocuronium infiltration during anesthesia induction. A 25-year-old woman with autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and epilepsy was scheduled for the extraction of 4 impacted third molars under general anesthesia. After induction with sevoflurane, an intravenous (IV) line was established in the left cephalic vein. Rocuronium was administered; however, subcutaneous swelling at the IV site was observed immediately. Spontaneous ventilations were maintained until additional rocuronium was administered via a new IV line. After heat pack application, the swelling disappeared 60 minutes after infiltration, and no tissue damage was observed. A strategy was developed to continue neuromuscular monitoring until recovery occurred. Acceleromyography was used, and the train-of-4 ratios at 99, 130, and 140 minutes after infiltration were 0.79, 0.91, and 1.0, respectively. Sugammadex was administered to prevent neuromuscular blockade recurrence. The patient was extubated once adequate return of muscle function and consciousness were observed. No neuromuscular block prolongation or recurrence were observed postoperatively. When rocuronium infiltration is suspected, it is important to eliminate swelling at the infiltration site and determine a management strategy based on neuromuscular monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":94296,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"70 3","pages":"116-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11080972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-70-02-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are few reports on rocuronium infiltration under general anesthesia. We report a case of suspected accidental rocuronium infiltration during anesthesia induction. A 25-year-old woman with autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and epilepsy was scheduled for the extraction of 4 impacted third molars under general anesthesia. After induction with sevoflurane, an intravenous (IV) line was established in the left cephalic vein. Rocuronium was administered; however, subcutaneous swelling at the IV site was observed immediately. Spontaneous ventilations were maintained until additional rocuronium was administered via a new IV line. After heat pack application, the swelling disappeared 60 minutes after infiltration, and no tissue damage was observed. A strategy was developed to continue neuromuscular monitoring until recovery occurred. Acceleromyography was used, and the train-of-4 ratios at 99, 130, and 140 minutes after infiltration were 0.79, 0.91, and 1.0, respectively. Sugammadex was administered to prevent neuromuscular blockade recurrence. The patient was extubated once adequate return of muscle function and consciousness were observed. No neuromuscular block prolongation or recurrence were observed postoperatively. When rocuronium infiltration is suspected, it is important to eliminate swelling at the infiltration site and determine a management strategy based on neuromuscular monitoring.

罗库在全麻诱导过程中疑似意外浸润:一例报告。
关于罗库在全身麻醉下浸润的报道很少。我们报告了一例疑似罗库在麻醉诱导过程中意外浸润的病例。一名患有自闭症谱系障碍、智力残疾和癫痫的25岁女性计划在全身麻醉下拔除4颗阻生第三磨牙。七氟烷诱导后,在左侧头静脉建立静脉(IV)线。给予罗库溴铵;然而,立即观察到IV部位的皮下肿胀。保持自发通气,直到通过新的静脉注射线给予罗库。应用热包后,渗透60分钟后肿胀消失,未观察到组织损伤。制定了一种策略,继续进行神经肌肉监测,直到恢复。使用加速度计,浸润后99、130和140分钟的4次训练比率分别为0.79、0.91和1.0。Sugammadex用于预防神经肌肉阻滞复发。一旦观察到患者的肌肉功能和意识得到充分恢复,就拔管。术后未观察到神经肌肉阻滞延长或复发。当怀疑罗库浸润时,重要的是消除浸润部位的肿胀,并根据神经肌肉监测确定管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信