Barriers and Opportunities to Improve the Implementation of Patient Screening and Linkage to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Primary Care.

Carrie L Nacht, Jennifer K Felner, Sandhya Muthuramalingam, William Towner, Deborah Ling Grant, Alexander Martos, John M Chang, Rulin Hechter, Erik D Storholm
{"title":"Barriers and Opportunities to Improve the Implementation of Patient Screening and Linkage to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Primary Care.","authors":"Carrie L Nacht, Jennifer K Felner, Sandhya Muthuramalingam, William Towner, Deborah Ling Grant, Alexander Martos, John M Chang, Rulin Hechter, Erik D Storholm","doi":"10.14302/issn.2324-7339.jcrhap-22-4371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective at preventing HIV infection, only around 25% of at-risk individuals in the United States have accessed a prescription. One way to increase PrEP uptake is through the sexual health screening of patients and linkage to PrEP in primary care settings. The objective of this analysis was to assess the barriers and implementation strategies during a screening and linkage to PrEP pilot intervention. Primary care patients were screened for PrEP indication during routine primary care visits. Of the 1,225 individuals screened, 1.8% (n=22) were eligible for PrEP and from those, 77.3% (n=17) attended the specialist appointment and were prescribed PrEP. Primary care patients (n=30) and providers (n=8) then participated in semi-structured interviews assessing their experience with the pilot intervention. Using an applied thematic analytic approach, patients and providers identified barriers and related improvement strategies that could be classified into four main categories: <i>1) Financial Barriers: Individual- vs. Clinic-level Considerations 2) The Role of Stigma, Discomfort, and Cultural Factors 3) Logistical Hurdles and Streamlining the Intervention</i>, and <i>4) The Lack of PrEP Knowledge and the Need for Education</i>. Findings support the accepatability and feasibility of screening for PrEP in primary care along with appropriate implementation strategies. This study suggests that because of the high volume of patients seen in primary care, sexual health screenings and linkage to PrEP interventions have the potential to reduce new incident HIV infections among diverse sexual minority men.</p>","PeriodicalId":90584,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical research in HIV AIDS and prevention","volume":"4 2","pages":"15-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10572105/pdf/nihms-1929607.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical research in HIV AIDS and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2324-7339.jcrhap-22-4371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective at preventing HIV infection, only around 25% of at-risk individuals in the United States have accessed a prescription. One way to increase PrEP uptake is through the sexual health screening of patients and linkage to PrEP in primary care settings. The objective of this analysis was to assess the barriers and implementation strategies during a screening and linkage to PrEP pilot intervention. Primary care patients were screened for PrEP indication during routine primary care visits. Of the 1,225 individuals screened, 1.8% (n=22) were eligible for PrEP and from those, 77.3% (n=17) attended the specialist appointment and were prescribed PrEP. Primary care patients (n=30) and providers (n=8) then participated in semi-structured interviews assessing their experience with the pilot intervention. Using an applied thematic analytic approach, patients and providers identified barriers and related improvement strategies that could be classified into four main categories: 1) Financial Barriers: Individual- vs. Clinic-level Considerations 2) The Role of Stigma, Discomfort, and Cultural Factors 3) Logistical Hurdles and Streamlining the Intervention, and 4) The Lack of PrEP Knowledge and the Need for Education. Findings support the accepatability and feasibility of screening for PrEP in primary care along with appropriate implementation strategies. This study suggests that because of the high volume of patients seen in primary care, sexual health screenings and linkage to PrEP interventions have the potential to reduce new incident HIV infections among diverse sexual minority men.

改善初级保健患者筛查实施的障碍和机会以及与暴露前预防的联系。
尽管暴露前预防(PrEP)在预防艾滋病毒感染方面非常有效,但在美国,只有大约25%的高危人群获得了处方。增加PrEP摄取的一种方法是通过对患者进行性健康筛查,并在初级保健环境中与PrEP联系起来。该分析的目的是评估筛查期间的障碍和实施策略,并将其与PrEP试点干预联系起来。在常规初级保健访视期间,对初级保健患者进行PrEP适应症筛查。在1225名接受筛查的患者中,1.8%(n=22)有资格接受PrEP,其中77.3%(n=17)参加了专家预约并开具了PrEP处方。然后,初级保健患者(n=30)和提供者(n=8)参加了半结构化访谈,评估他们的试点干预经验。使用应用的主题分析方法,患者和提供者确定了障碍和相关的改善策略,可分为四大类:1)经济障碍:个人与诊所层面的考虑因素2)耻辱、不适和文化因素的作用3)后勤障碍和简化干预,以及4)PrEP知识的缺乏和对教育的需求。研究结果支持在初级保健中筛查PrEP的可接受性和可行性以及适当的实施策略。这项研究表明,由于初级保健中的患者数量很大,性健康筛查和PrEP干预措施有可能减少不同性少数群体男性中新的艾滋病毒感染事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信