Assessing the impact of age on everyday cognitive function with a virtual environment task: The EcoKitchen.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2023.2265521
Filipa Júlio, Maria J Ribeiro, Mário R Simões, Miguel Castelo-Branco, Cristina Januário
{"title":"Assessing the impact of age on everyday cognitive function with a virtual environment task: The <i>EcoKitchen</i>.","authors":"Filipa Júlio, Maria J Ribeiro, Mário R Simões, Miguel Castelo-Branco, Cristina Januário","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2023.2265521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More realistic assessment tools are imperative for a better understanding of the impact of age-related cognitive deficits on functional status. With this in mind, we probed the ability of the <i>EcoKitchen</i>, a non-immersive virtual environment task with increasing executively demanding kitchen chores, to detect the effects of aging on the simulated everyday functioning of healthy adults. Fifty-three adults (age between 23 and 77 years) were assessed with the <i>EcoKitchen</i> and a set of conventional paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tests. The associations between the baseline features of study participants and each of the two different assessment methods were examined. The associations between the <i>EcoKitchen</i> variables and an executive composite score were also explored. Our results showed that older individuals present deficits in the performance of both the <i>EcoKitchen</i> task and standard assessment methods. Notably, we found that, unlike conventional tests, accuracy in the <i>EcoKitchen</i> task was not related to the education level and IQ score of participants. Moreover, the <i>EcoKitchen</i> performance time was significantly correlated with executive tests. We have demonstrated that the <i>EcoKitchen</i> task, an ecologically relevant computerized neuropsychological assessment tool, might be more suitable than classic paper-and-pencil tests to capture the impact of aging on everyday cognitive function, as it proved to be less prone to the influence of confounding factors. Additionally, we have shown that executive function plays an important role in the timely performance of cognitively challenging virtual environment tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1306-1316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2023.2265521","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

More realistic assessment tools are imperative for a better understanding of the impact of age-related cognitive deficits on functional status. With this in mind, we probed the ability of the EcoKitchen, a non-immersive virtual environment task with increasing executively demanding kitchen chores, to detect the effects of aging on the simulated everyday functioning of healthy adults. Fifty-three adults (age between 23 and 77 years) were assessed with the EcoKitchen and a set of conventional paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tests. The associations between the baseline features of study participants and each of the two different assessment methods were examined. The associations between the EcoKitchen variables and an executive composite score were also explored. Our results showed that older individuals present deficits in the performance of both the EcoKitchen task and standard assessment methods. Notably, we found that, unlike conventional tests, accuracy in the EcoKitchen task was not related to the education level and IQ score of participants. Moreover, the EcoKitchen performance time was significantly correlated with executive tests. We have demonstrated that the EcoKitchen task, an ecologically relevant computerized neuropsychological assessment tool, might be more suitable than classic paper-and-pencil tests to capture the impact of aging on everyday cognitive function, as it proved to be less prone to the influence of confounding factors. Additionally, we have shown that executive function plays an important role in the timely performance of cognitively challenging virtual environment tasks.

通过虚拟环境任务评估年龄对日常认知功能的影响:生态厨房。
为了更好地理解与年龄相关的认知缺陷对功能状态的影响,更现实的评估工具是必不可少的。考虑到这一点,我们探索了EcoKitchen的能力,这是一项非沉浸式虚拟环境任务,具有越来越高的执行要求,可以检测衰老对健康成年人模拟日常功能的影响。五十三名成年人(年龄在23至77岁之间 年)用EcoKitchen和一组传统的纸笔神经心理学测试进行评估。研究参与者的基线特征与两种不同的评估方法之间的相关性进行了检查。还探讨了EcoKitchen变量与高管综合得分之间的关联。我们的研究结果表明,老年人在执行EcoKitchen任务和标准评估方法方面都存在缺陷。值得注意的是,我们发现,与传统测试不同,EcoKitchen任务的准确性与参与者的教育水平和智商分数无关。此外,EcoKitchen的表现时间与执行测试显著相关。我们已经证明,EcoKitchen任务是一种与生态相关的计算机化神经心理评估工具,可能比经典的纸笔测试更适合捕捉衰老对日常认知功能的影响,因为它被证明不太容易受到混杂因素的影响。此外,我们已经表明,执行功能在及时执行具有认知挑战性的虚拟环境任务方面发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信