Moving From Alteplase to Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Mayo Clinic Experience.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ahmed Koriesh, Michael Liu, Waleed Brinjikji, James Klaas, Deena Nasr, Zafer Keser
{"title":"Moving From Alteplase to Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Mayo Clinic Experience.","authors":"Ahmed Koriesh, Michael Liu, Waleed Brinjikji, James Klaas, Deena Nasr, Zafer Keser","doi":"10.1097/NRL.0000000000000524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Tenecteplase is a fibrin-specific plasminogen activator that has shown promising results in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Tenecteplase has been suggested to reduce door-to-needle time and to increase the rate of spontaneous recanalization. In February 2021, Mayo Clinic Health System switched to Tenecteplase as the standard thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this center-based observational cohort study, we present clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with tenecteplase between February 2021 and May 2022 compared with alteplase treatment between September 2019 and February 2021. We used descriptive and comparative statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was significantly less among the tenecteplase group (0.65% vs. 5%, P =0.027). Both groups had a similar door-to-needle time [55 (IQR 30.5) vs. 57 (IQR 38) in the tissue plasminogen activator group, P =0.395]. Spontaneous partial or complete recanalization was more commonly observed in the tenecteplase group (10.4% vs. 1.4%, P =0.038). Mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion was deferred due to marked clinical improvement more commonly in tenecteplase (6.3% vs. 1.4%); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Ninety-day modified Rankin Scale did not show a significant difference between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tenecteplase use as the thrombolytic agent in acute ischemic stroke was associated with lower rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, higher rates of spontaneous recanalization, but similar door-to-needle time and 90-day modified Rankin Scale as compared with tissue plasminogen activator.</p>","PeriodicalId":49758,"journal":{"name":"Neurologist","volume":" ","pages":"50-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NRL.0000000000000524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Tenecteplase is a fibrin-specific plasminogen activator that has shown promising results in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Tenecteplase has been suggested to reduce door-to-needle time and to increase the rate of spontaneous recanalization. In February 2021, Mayo Clinic Health System switched to Tenecteplase as the standard thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke.

Methods: In this center-based observational cohort study, we present clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with tenecteplase between February 2021 and May 2022 compared with alteplase treatment between September 2019 and February 2021. We used descriptive and comparative statistics.

Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was significantly less among the tenecteplase group (0.65% vs. 5%, P =0.027). Both groups had a similar door-to-needle time [55 (IQR 30.5) vs. 57 (IQR 38) in the tissue plasminogen activator group, P =0.395]. Spontaneous partial or complete recanalization was more commonly observed in the tenecteplase group (10.4% vs. 1.4%, P =0.038). Mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion was deferred due to marked clinical improvement more commonly in tenecteplase (6.3% vs. 1.4%); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Ninety-day modified Rankin Scale did not show a significant difference between the groups.

Conclusion: Tenecteplase use as the thrombolytic agent in acute ischemic stroke was associated with lower rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, higher rates of spontaneous recanalization, but similar door-to-needle time and 90-day modified Rankin Scale as compared with tissue plasminogen activator.

从阿替普酶转为替萘普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中Mayo临床经验。
目的:替萘普酶是一种纤维蛋白特异性纤溶酶原激活剂,在治疗急性缺血性脑卒中方面显示出良好的疗效。特奈普酶被认为可以减少门到针的时间,并提高自发再通率。2021年2月,梅奥诊所卫生系统改用替萘普酶作为急性缺血性中风的标准溶栓治疗。方法:在这项基于中心的观察性队列研究中,我们介绍了2021年2月至2022年5月接受替萘普酶治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者的临床特征和结果,与2019年9月至2021年2月份接受阿替普酶治疗相比。我们使用了描述性和比较性统计数据。结果:两组的基线特征具有可比性。替萘普酶组症状性脑出血的发生率显著降低(0.65%对5%,P=0.027)。两组的门到针时间相似[55(IQR 30.5)对组织纤溶酶原激活剂组的57(IQR 38),P=0.0395]大血管闭塞的血栓切除术被推迟,因为替萘普酶的临床改善更常见(6.3%vs.1.4%);然而,这种差异在统计学上并不显著。90天改良的兰金量表在两组之间没有显示出显著差异。结论:与组织型纤溶酶原激活剂相比,替萘普酶作为急性缺血性卒中的溶栓剂与症状性颅内出血发生率较低、自发再通发生率较高有关,但门到针时间和90天改良Rankin量表相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologist
Neurologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Neurologist publishes articles on topics of current interest to physicians treating patients with neurological diseases. The core of the journal is review articles focusing on clinically relevant issues. The journal also publishes case reports or case series which review the literature and put observations in perspective, as well as letters to the editor. Special features include the popular "10 Most Commonly Asked Questions" and the "Patient and Family Fact Sheet," a handy tear-out page that can be copied to hand out to patients and their caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信