Level of implementation of pain management and early mobilization strategies to prevent delirium in geriatric trauma patients: A mixed-methods study

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
Maryline Beaudoin , Etienne L. Belzile , Céline Gélinas , David Trépanier , Marcel Émond , Marc-Aurèle Gagnon , Mélanie Bérubé
{"title":"Level of implementation of pain management and early mobilization strategies to prevent delirium in geriatric trauma patients: A mixed-methods study","authors":"Maryline Beaudoin ,&nbsp;Etienne L. Belzile ,&nbsp;Céline Gélinas ,&nbsp;David Trépanier ,&nbsp;Marcel Émond ,&nbsp;Marc-Aurèle Gagnon ,&nbsp;Mélanie Bérubé","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2023.101050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Pain management and </span>early mobilization strategies are recommended in clinical practice guidelines for the prevention of delirium in older adults. However, available data on the implementation of these strategies in trauma are limited.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To describe the use of pain management and early mobilization strategies in older adults at a level I trauma center, as well as the facilitators and barriers to their implementation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A convergent mixed methods study was used. Quantitative data were collected from sixty medical records. Qualitative data was collected through a focus group with healthcare providers to explore their perspectives regarding the use of the target practices and on barriers and facilitators to their implementation. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and a thematic analysis using an inductive and deductive interpretative descriptive approach was undertaken.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A question on the presence/absence of pain was the most frequently documented pain assessment method. Pain assessment was poorly documented. Frequencies of non-opioid and opioid administrations were similar, but non-pharmacological strategies were not widely used. The first mobilization was performed quickly and was most commonly to a chair. The focus group discussion confirmed many of the data collected in the medical records. Barriers to implementing the targeted strategies were primarily related to organizational context and facilitation processes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Areas for improvement were identified including pain assessment, the use of non-pharmacological pain management strategies and ambulation as a mobilization strategy. Our findings will serve as a starting point for optimizing and adapting practices for geriatric trauma patients and evaluating their impact.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124123000540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pain management and early mobilization strategies are recommended in clinical practice guidelines for the prevention of delirium in older adults. However, available data on the implementation of these strategies in trauma are limited.

Aims

To describe the use of pain management and early mobilization strategies in older adults at a level I trauma center, as well as the facilitators and barriers to their implementation.

Methods

A convergent mixed methods study was used. Quantitative data were collected from sixty medical records. Qualitative data was collected through a focus group with healthcare providers to explore their perspectives regarding the use of the target practices and on barriers and facilitators to their implementation. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and a thematic analysis using an inductive and deductive interpretative descriptive approach was undertaken.

Results

A question on the presence/absence of pain was the most frequently documented pain assessment method. Pain assessment was poorly documented. Frequencies of non-opioid and opioid administrations were similar, but non-pharmacological strategies were not widely used. The first mobilization was performed quickly and was most commonly to a chair. The focus group discussion confirmed many of the data collected in the medical records. Barriers to implementing the targeted strategies were primarily related to organizational context and facilitation processes.

Conclusions

Areas for improvement were identified including pain assessment, the use of non-pharmacological pain management strategies and ambulation as a mobilization strategy. Our findings will serve as a starting point for optimizing and adapting practices for geriatric trauma patients and evaluating their impact.

老年创伤患者预防谵妄的疼痛管理和早期动员策略的实施水平:一项混合方法研究。
背景:预防老年人谵妄的临床实践指南建议采用疼痛管理和早期动员策略。然而,关于在创伤中实施这些策略的现有数据有限。目的:描述一级创伤中心老年人疼痛管理和早期动员策略的使用情况,以及实施这些策略的推动者和障碍。方法:采用收敛混合方法研究。从60份病历中收集了定量数据。通过与医疗保健提供者组成的焦点小组收集定性数据,以探讨他们对目标实践的使用以及实施目标实践的障碍和促进因素的看法。对描述性统计数据进行了计算,并采用归纳和演绎的解释性描述性方法进行了专题分析。结果:关于疼痛是否存在的问题是最常见的疼痛评估方法。疼痛评估记录不足。非阿片类和阿片类给药的频率相似,但非药理学策略没有得到广泛使用。第一次动员进行得很快,最常见的是坐在椅子上。焦点小组讨论证实了医疗记录中收集的许多数据。执行有针对性的战略的障碍主要与组织背景和促进进程有关。结论:确定了需要改进的领域,包括疼痛评估、非药物疼痛管理策略的使用以及作为动员策略的步行。我们的研究结果将作为优化和调整老年创伤患者实践并评估其影响的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信