Lack of Publicly Available Documentation Limits Spread of Integrated Care Innovations in Canada.

Q2 Medicine
Tara Stewart, Émilie Dionne, Robin Urquhart, Nelly D Oelke, Jessie Lee Mcisaac, Catherine M Scott, Jeannie Haggerty
{"title":"Lack of Publicly Available Documentation Limits Spread of Integrated Care Innovations in Canada.","authors":"Tara Stewart, Émilie Dionne, Robin Urquhart, Nelly D Oelke, Jessie Lee Mcisaac, Catherine M Scott, Jeannie Haggerty","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2023.27176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As healthcare in Canada is provincially operated, the program innovations in one jurisdiction may not be readily known in other jurisdictions. We examine the availability of implementation-specific data for 30 innovative Canadian programs designed to integrate health and social services for patients with complex needs. Using publicly available data and key informant interviews, we were able to populate only ∼50% of our data collection tool (on average). Formal program evaluations were available for only ∼30% of programs. Multiple barriers exist to the compilation and verification of healthcare programs' implementation data across Canada, limiting cross-jurisdictional learning and making a comparison of programs challenging.</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"19 SP","pages":"88-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2023.27176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As healthcare in Canada is provincially operated, the program innovations in one jurisdiction may not be readily known in other jurisdictions. We examine the availability of implementation-specific data for 30 innovative Canadian programs designed to integrate health and social services for patients with complex needs. Using publicly available data and key informant interviews, we were able to populate only ∼50% of our data collection tool (on average). Formal program evaluations were available for only ∼30% of programs. Multiple barriers exist to the compilation and verification of healthcare programs' implementation data across Canada, limiting cross-jurisdictional learning and making a comparison of programs challenging.

缺乏公开的文件限制了综合护理创新在加拿大的传播。
由于加拿大的医疗保健是省级运营的,一个司法管辖区的计划创新在其他司法管辖区可能并不为人所知。我们研究了加拿大30个创新项目的实施具体数据的可用性,这些项目旨在为有复杂需求的患者整合健康和社会服务。使用公开的数据和关键线人访谈,我们只能填充大约50%的数据收集工具(平均)。正式的项目评估只适用于约30%的项目。加拿大各地医疗保健项目实施数据的汇编和验证存在多重障碍,限制了跨司法管辖区的学习,并使项目的比较具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信