The Influence of Knee Position on Ultrasound Imaging of Femoral Cartilage in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
CARTILAGE Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1177/19476035231205682
Harry S Battersby, Skylar C Holmes, Eric J Shumski, Caitlyn E Heredia, Steven A Garcia, Derek N Pamukoff
{"title":"The Influence of Knee Position on Ultrasound Imaging of Femoral Cartilage in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Harry S Battersby, Skylar C Holmes, Eric J Shumski, Caitlyn E Heredia, Steven A Garcia, Derek N Pamukoff","doi":"10.1177/19476035231205682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Articular cartilage is important for knee function and can be imaged using ultrasound. The purpose was to compare femoral cartilage thickness and echo intensity (EI) measured at 90° and 140° of knee flexion and between limbs in a cohort with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). We also examined associations between gait biomechanics and cartilage outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven individuals with primary unilateral ACLR participated (12 men, 15 women; age = 22.3 ± 3.8 years; time since ACLR = 71.2 ± 47.2 months). Ultrasound was used to obtain femoral cartilage measurements. Gait outcomes included peak KFA (knee flexion angle) and peak external knee flexion moment (KFM). Cartilage outcomes were compared using a 2 (<i>position</i>) × 2 (<i>limb</i>) repeated measures ANOVA (analysis of variance). Gait and cartilage associations were assessed using linear regression.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There were no position × limb interactions for any cartilage outcome (all <i>P</i> > 0.05). Medial (<i>P</i> = 0.038) and central cartilage (<i>P</i> < 0.001) were thicker, whereas central (<i>P</i> = 0.029) and lateral cartilage EI (<i>P</i> = 0.003) were lower when measured at 90° than those at 140° of knee flexion. Medial cartilage was thicker in the ACLR than that in the contralateral limb (<i>P</i> = 0.016). A larger KFM was associated with thicker medial cartilage (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.146, <i>P</i> = 0.021) and central cartilage (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.159, <i>P</i> = 0.039) measured at 140° of knee flexion in the ACLR limb but not at 90°.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Findings suggest that imaging position influences cartilage thickness and EI measurements in individuals with ACLR and should be considered in study designs and clinical evaluation. A greater KFM was associated with thicker cartilage within specific portions of the distal femur.</p>","PeriodicalId":9626,"journal":{"name":"CARTILAGE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CARTILAGE","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19476035231205682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Articular cartilage is important for knee function and can be imaged using ultrasound. The purpose was to compare femoral cartilage thickness and echo intensity (EI) measured at 90° and 140° of knee flexion and between limbs in a cohort with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). We also examined associations between gait biomechanics and cartilage outcomes.

Methods: Twenty-seven individuals with primary unilateral ACLR participated (12 men, 15 women; age = 22.3 ± 3.8 years; time since ACLR = 71.2 ± 47.2 months). Ultrasound was used to obtain femoral cartilage measurements. Gait outcomes included peak KFA (knee flexion angle) and peak external knee flexion moment (KFM). Cartilage outcomes were compared using a 2 (position) × 2 (limb) repeated measures ANOVA (analysis of variance). Gait and cartilage associations were assessed using linear regression.

Findings: There were no position × limb interactions for any cartilage outcome (all P > 0.05). Medial (P = 0.038) and central cartilage (P < 0.001) were thicker, whereas central (P = 0.029) and lateral cartilage EI (P = 0.003) were lower when measured at 90° than those at 140° of knee flexion. Medial cartilage was thicker in the ACLR than that in the contralateral limb (P = 0.016). A larger KFM was associated with thicker medial cartilage (ΔR2 = 0.146, P = 0.021) and central cartilage (ΔR2 = 0.159, P = 0.039) measured at 140° of knee flexion in the ACLR limb but not at 90°.

Interpretation: Findings suggest that imaging position influences cartilage thickness and EI measurements in individuals with ACLR and should be considered in study designs and clinical evaluation. A greater KFM was associated with thicker cartilage within specific portions of the distal femur.

膝关节位置对前交叉韧带重建患者股骨软骨超声成像的影响。
背景:关节软骨对膝关节功能很重要,可以通过超声成像。目的是比较单侧前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)队列中膝关节屈曲90°和140°时以及四肢之间测量的股骨软骨厚度和回声强度(EI)。我们还研究了步态生物力学和软骨结果之间的关系。方法:27名原发性单侧ACLR患者(12名男性,15名女性;年龄=22.3±3.8岁;自ACLR以来的时间=71.2±47.2个月)。使用超声波测量股骨软骨。步态结果包括峰值KFA(膝关节屈曲角)和峰值外膝关节屈曲力矩(KFM)。使用2(位置)×2(肢体)重复测量ANOVA(方差分析)比较软骨结果。步态和软骨的相关性使用线性回归进行评估。结果:任何软骨结果均无位置×肢体相互作用(均P>0.05)。内侧软骨(P=0.038)和中央软骨(P<0.001)较厚,而中央软骨(P=0.029)和外侧软骨EI(P=0.003)在90°膝关节屈曲时的测量值低于140°膝关节弯曲时的测量结果。ACLR的内侧软骨比对侧肢体的内侧软骨厚(P=0.016)。较大的KFM与较厚的内侧软骨(ΔR2=0.146,P=0.021)和中央软骨(ΔR2=0.159,P=0.039)有关,在ACLR肢体膝关节屈曲140°时测得,但在90°时测不到患有ACLR的个体,应在研究设计和临床评估中予以考虑。较大的KFM与股骨远端特定部分内较厚的软骨有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CARTILAGE
CARTILAGE ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: CARTILAGE publishes articles related to the musculoskeletal system with particular attention to cartilage repair, development, function, degeneration, transplantation, and rehabilitation. The journal is a forum for the exchange of ideas for the many types of researchers and clinicians involved in cartilage biology and repair. A primary objective of CARTILAGE is to foster the cross-fertilization of the findings between clinical and basic sciences throughout the various disciplines involved in cartilage repair. The journal publishes full length original manuscripts on all types of cartilage including articular, nasal, auricular, tracheal/bronchial, and intervertebral disc fibrocartilage. Manuscripts on clinical and laboratory research are welcome. Review articles, editorials, and letters are also encouraged. The ICRS envisages CARTILAGE as a forum for the exchange of knowledge among clinicians, scientists, patients, and researchers. The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) is dedicated to promotion, encouragement, and distribution of fundamental and applied research of cartilage in order to permit a better knowledge of function and dysfunction of articular cartilage and its repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信