Sidewall effects in laminar ramp induced shockwave boundary layer interactions

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Raja Mangalagiri, Satya P. Jammy
{"title":"Sidewall effects in laminar ramp induced shockwave boundary layer interactions","authors":"Raja Mangalagiri,&nbsp;Satya P. Jammy","doi":"10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.106063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shock-wave boundary layer interactions (SWBLI) play a significant role in control surfaces and engine inlets. However, most simulations commonly assume span-periodic or 2D. Recent research conducted by Lusher and Sandham (2020) investigated the effects of sidewalls in impinging-type SWBLI (ISWBLI). This study’s focus is to numerically explore the influence of sidewalls in a three-dimensional context for ramp-induced SWBLI (RSWBLI). First a 2D ramp-induced separated boundary layer interaction with a ramp angle of <span><math><mrow><mn>6</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>8</mn><mo>°</mo></mrow></math></span> was identified. This configuration produced the same pressure rise and separation characteristics as those reported by Katzer (1989) at a Mach number of 2 and an impinging Reynolds number of <span><math><mrow><mn>3</mn><mo>×</mo><mn>1</mn><msup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>5</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>. Subsequently, the sidewall was introduced for Aspect Ratio 1 and the results were analysed. From the analysis it was found out that the separation length for the 3D case is 14% greater than that observed in the 2D simulation. Upon comparison with the ISWBLI study of Lusher and Sandham (2020), it was found that (a) the sidewall and central separation are connected in RSWBLI, contrasting with ISWBLI, (b) the extent of sidewall separation in RSWBLI is very limited compared to the impingement interaction, and (c) RSWBLI displays characteristics closer to an owl-like separation of second kind, whereas in ISWBLI exhibits characteristics of the first kind of separation. Even though having identical shock-strength and separation length for both R &amp; I SWBLI in 2D configuration, the introduction of sidewall resulted in a distinct topology and dynamics of interaction .</p></div>","PeriodicalId":287,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Fluids","volume":"267 ","pages":"Article 106063"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045793023002888","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shock-wave boundary layer interactions (SWBLI) play a significant role in control surfaces and engine inlets. However, most simulations commonly assume span-periodic or 2D. Recent research conducted by Lusher and Sandham (2020) investigated the effects of sidewalls in impinging-type SWBLI (ISWBLI). This study’s focus is to numerically explore the influence of sidewalls in a three-dimensional context for ramp-induced SWBLI (RSWBLI). First a 2D ramp-induced separated boundary layer interaction with a ramp angle of 6.8° was identified. This configuration produced the same pressure rise and separation characteristics as those reported by Katzer (1989) at a Mach number of 2 and an impinging Reynolds number of 3×105. Subsequently, the sidewall was introduced for Aspect Ratio 1 and the results were analysed. From the analysis it was found out that the separation length for the 3D case is 14% greater than that observed in the 2D simulation. Upon comparison with the ISWBLI study of Lusher and Sandham (2020), it was found that (a) the sidewall and central separation are connected in RSWBLI, contrasting with ISWBLI, (b) the extent of sidewall separation in RSWBLI is very limited compared to the impingement interaction, and (c) RSWBLI displays characteristics closer to an owl-like separation of second kind, whereas in ISWBLI exhibits characteristics of the first kind of separation. Even though having identical shock-strength and separation length for both R & I SWBLI in 2D configuration, the introduction of sidewall resulted in a distinct topology and dynamics of interaction .

层流斜坡诱导的冲击波边界层相互作用中的侧壁效应
冲击波边界层相互作用(SWBLI)在控制面和发动机进气道中起着重要作用。然而,大多数模拟通常假设跨度是周期性的或二维的。Lusher和Sandham(2020)最近进行的研究调查了撞击型SWBLI(ISWBLI)中侧壁的影响。本研究的重点是在三维背景下数值探索侧壁对斜坡诱导SWBLI(RSWBLI)的影响。首先,确定了斜坡角为6.8°的二维斜坡诱导的分离边界层相互作用。这种构型在马赫数为2和撞击雷诺数为3×105时产生了与Katzer(1989)报道的相同的压力上升和分离特性。随后,针对纵横比1引入侧壁,并对结果进行分析。从分析中发现,3D情况下的分离长度比2D模拟中观察到的分离长度大14%。在与Lusher和Sandham(2020)的ISWBLI研究进行比较后,发现(a)与ISWBLI相比,RSWBLI中的侧壁和中心分离是连接的,(b)与撞击相互作用相比,RSWBLI中侧壁分离的程度非常有限,并且(c)RSWBLI显示出更接近第二类猫头鹰状分离的特征,而在ISWBLI中表现出第一种分离的特征。即使对于两个R&;I SWBLI在2D配置中,侧壁的引入导致了不同的拓扑结构和相互作用的动力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Fluids
Computers & Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Fluids is multidisciplinary. The term ''fluid'' is interpreted in the broadest sense. Hydro- and aerodynamics, high-speed and physical gas dynamics, turbulence and flow stability, multiphase flow, rheology, tribology and fluid-structure interaction are all of interest, provided that computer technique plays a significant role in the associated studies or design methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信