Comparison of the effects of general and spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery on maternal and fetal outcomes: A retrospective analysis of data.

Northern clinics of Istanbul Pub Date : 2023-09-11 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.14744/nci.2023.25593
Mesure Gul Nihan Ozden, Senem Koruk, Zeynep Collak, Nur Panik
{"title":"Comparison of the effects of general and spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery on maternal and fetal outcomes: A retrospective analysis of data.","authors":"Mesure Gul Nihan Ozden,&nbsp;Senem Koruk,&nbsp;Zeynep Collak,&nbsp;Nur Panik","doi":"10.14744/nci.2023.25593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>General or single-shut spinal anesthesia (SA) is applied for cesarean section and both methods of anesthesia have different effects on the mother and newborn. This retrospective study, in which 1-year data were analyzed, was aimed to examine the effects of general or SA on maternal and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anesthesia technique, mother's age, gestational age, number of pregnancies, previous cesarean delivery number, maternal complications, and indications for cesarean delivery were analyzed in 883 cesarean deliveries. In addition, weight and Apgar scores of newborn and umbilical cord blood gas values were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neonatal intensive care need was higher in the general anesthesia (GA) group, Apgar scores were higher in the SA group, but neonatal mortality was similar. The umbilical cord Ph and lactate were lower; PCO<sub>2</sub> values were higher in the GA group. Neonatal weight, mother's age, gestational age, and Apgar scores were predictive for neonatal mortality, but anesthesia technique was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While umbilical cord blood gas values were less affected and the need for neonatal intensive care was lower with SA, we believe that both anesthesia methods can be used safely for mother and neonatal in cesarean anesthesia considering maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":94347,"journal":{"name":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","volume":"10 5","pages":"575-582"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d9/12/NCI-10-575.PMC10565739.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2023.25593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: General or single-shut spinal anesthesia (SA) is applied for cesarean section and both methods of anesthesia have different effects on the mother and newborn. This retrospective study, in which 1-year data were analyzed, was aimed to examine the effects of general or SA on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Methods: Anesthesia technique, mother's age, gestational age, number of pregnancies, previous cesarean delivery number, maternal complications, and indications for cesarean delivery were analyzed in 883 cesarean deliveries. In addition, weight and Apgar scores of newborn and umbilical cord blood gas values were examined.

Results: Neonatal intensive care need was higher in the general anesthesia (GA) group, Apgar scores were higher in the SA group, but neonatal mortality was similar. The umbilical cord Ph and lactate were lower; PCO2 values were higher in the GA group. Neonatal weight, mother's age, gestational age, and Apgar scores were predictive for neonatal mortality, but anesthesia technique was not.

Conclusion: While umbilical cord blood gas values were less affected and the need for neonatal intensive care was lower with SA, we believe that both anesthesia methods can be used safely for mother and neonatal in cesarean anesthesia considering maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

剖宫产全麻和腰麻对产妇和胎儿结局影响的比较:数据的回顾性分析。
目的:剖宫产手术采用全身或单次闭式脊麻(SA),两种麻醉方法对产妇和新生儿的影响不同。这项回顾性研究分析了一年的数据,旨在检验普通或SA对孕产妇和新生儿结局的影响。方法:对883例剖宫产患者的麻醉技术、母亲年龄、孕龄、妊娠次数、既往剖宫产次数、产妇并发症及剖宫产指征进行分析。此外,还检查了新生儿体重和Apgar评分以及脐带血气值。结果:全麻组新生儿重症监护需求较高,SA组Apgar评分较高,但新生儿死亡率相似。脐带Ph和乳酸盐含量较低;GA组的PCO2值较高。新生儿体重、母亲年龄、胎龄和Apgar评分可预测新生儿死亡率,但麻醉技术不能预测。结论:虽然SA对脐带血气值的影响较小,对新生儿重症监护的需求也较低,但考虑到产妇和新生儿的发病率和死亡率,我们相信这两种麻醉方法都可以安全地用于剖宫产麻醉中的母亲和新生儿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信