PREVENTION OF PATHOLOGICAL EFFECT OF ISCHEMIA-REPERFUSION IN LIVER RESECTION BY SEVOFLURANE PRECONDITIONING.

I I Lisnyy, K A Zakalska, A A Burlaka, S A Lysykh, O V Efimenko
{"title":"PREVENTION OF PATHOLOGICAL EFFECT OF ISCHEMIA-REPERFUSION IN LIVER RESECTION BY SEVOFLURANE PRECONDITIONING.","authors":"I I Lisnyy,&nbsp;K A Zakalska,&nbsp;A A Burlaka,&nbsp;S A Lysykh,&nbsp;O V Efimenko","doi":"10.15407/exp-oncology.2023.02.252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intermittent Pringle maneuver remains the major technique for controlling hemorrhage during liver surgery. Nevertheless, this procedure involves a risk of triggering a cascade of pathological changes resulting in the ischemia-reperfusion injury (I/R) effect. The pharmacological prevention of this I/R injury represents a promising approach. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of pharmacological preconditioning with sevoflurane and propofol-based intravenous anesthesia on the postoperative function of the liver as the primary end-point.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study includes the analysis of the data of 73 patients who underwent liver surgery. In the study group (n = 41), preconditioning with sevoflurane inhalation was provided 30 minutes prior to liver resection. In the control group (n = 32), sevoflurane preconditioning was not provided. The primary endpoints were blood lactate concentration shortly after the surgery and one day later; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activities on postoperative Days 1, 3, and 5 as markers of hepatocyte damage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On postoperative Day 1, in patients of the study group, lactate decreased to preoperative levels, while in the control group, lactate content increased as compared to both preoperative levels and the levels immediately after liver resection. A significant difference in AST activity levels between the groups was registered on Day 5, although this difference was not clinically relevant. The decrease in the prothrombin index in the study group on Day 3 was superior to that in the control group. The multiple regression analysis demonstrated a moderate positive association between the number of resected liver segments and the markers of the functional state of the liver in the study group while in the control group, such association was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The protective effect of sevoflurane on the postoperative function of the liver is manifested by the lower level of blood lactate and the stable level of transaminase activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94318,"journal":{"name":"Experimental oncology","volume":"45 2","pages":"252-262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2023.02.252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The intermittent Pringle maneuver remains the major technique for controlling hemorrhage during liver surgery. Nevertheless, this procedure involves a risk of triggering a cascade of pathological changes resulting in the ischemia-reperfusion injury (I/R) effect. The pharmacological prevention of this I/R injury represents a promising approach. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of pharmacological preconditioning with sevoflurane and propofol-based intravenous anesthesia on the postoperative function of the liver as the primary end-point.

Materials and methods: A prospective cohort study includes the analysis of the data of 73 patients who underwent liver surgery. In the study group (n = 41), preconditioning with sevoflurane inhalation was provided 30 minutes prior to liver resection. In the control group (n = 32), sevoflurane preconditioning was not provided. The primary endpoints were blood lactate concentration shortly after the surgery and one day later; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activities on postoperative Days 1, 3, and 5 as markers of hepatocyte damage.

Results: On postoperative Day 1, in patients of the study group, lactate decreased to preoperative levels, while in the control group, lactate content increased as compared to both preoperative levels and the levels immediately after liver resection. A significant difference in AST activity levels between the groups was registered on Day 5, although this difference was not clinically relevant. The decrease in the prothrombin index in the study group on Day 3 was superior to that in the control group. The multiple regression analysis demonstrated a moderate positive association between the number of resected liver segments and the markers of the functional state of the liver in the study group while in the control group, such association was not significant.

Conclusion: The protective effect of sevoflurane on the postoperative function of the liver is manifested by the lower level of blood lactate and the stable level of transaminase activity.

七氟醚预处理预防肝切除术中缺血再灌注的病理效应。
背景:间歇性普林格尔手法仍然是控制肝脏手术出血的主要技术。然而,这一过程涉及触发一系列病理变化的风险,从而导致缺血再灌注损伤(I/R)效应。药物预防这种I/R损伤是一种很有前途的方法。本研究的目的是比较以七氟醚和丙泊酚为基础的静脉麻醉的药物预处理对作为主要终点的肝脏术后功能的影响。材料和方法:一项前瞻性队列研究包括对73名接受肝脏手术的患者的数据的分析。在研究组(n=41)中,在肝切除前30分钟提供七氟烷吸入预处理。对照组(n=32)未提供七氟醚预处理。主要终点是手术后不久和一天后的血乳酸浓度;术后第1、3和5天的丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)和天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)活性作为肝细胞损伤的标志物。结果:在术后第1天,研究组患者的乳酸降至术前水平,而对照组患者的乳酸盐含量与术前水平和肝切除后立即的水平相比都有所增加。在第5天,两组之间的AST活性水平存在显著差异,尽管这种差异与临床无关。研究组凝血酶原指数在第3天的下降优于对照组。多元回归分析表明,在研究组中,切除的肝段数量与肝脏功能状态的标志物之间存在中度正相关,而在对照组中,这种相关性并不显著。结论:七氟醚对肝脏术后功能的保护作用表现为血乳酸水平较低,转氨酶活性稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信