A Narrative Review on Oral Mucosa Biomechanics and Clinical Implications of Periodontal and Implant-Related Regenerative Procedures.

Amanda Rodriguez, Maged Mohamed, Sara AlHachache, Oliver Kripfgans, Hsun-Liang Chan
{"title":"A Narrative Review on Oral Mucosa Biomechanics and Clinical Implications of Periodontal and Implant-Related Regenerative Procedures.","authors":"Amanda Rodriguez, Maged Mohamed, Sara AlHachache, Oliver Kripfgans, Hsun-Liang Chan","doi":"10.11607/prd.6786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healing outcomes of periodontal and implant-related regenerative procedures are closely related to wound stability, which is partially determined by biomechanical properties and behaviors of oral mu- cosal tissues. Studies on soft tissue behavior under biomechanical forces in oral regeneration models are scarce. Thus, this review aims to (1) contrast the microstructural differences between the attached gingiva (AM) and lining (LM) mucosa; (2) evaluate biomechanical behaviors of the two mucosal types; and (3) relate residual flap tension to the prevalence of wound opening after regenerative procedures. Compositional and structural differences between the AM and LM explain their biomechanical property differences. Wound destabilizers, including tissue recoil stemming from its viscoelastic property, muscle pull, and inflammatory edema (created after the flap-releasing procedure for primary wound closure) in- terfere with wound stability. Residual flap tension < 0.05 N is a prerequisite for sustained wound closure. Tissues under stress can exert negative cellular changes, resulting in necrosis and wound dehiscence. Biomechanical properties and the variations between AM and LM dictate the degree of wound stability. Efforts should be made to reduce the negative impact of the potential destabilizers to optimize wound stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healing outcomes of periodontal and implant-related regenerative procedures are closely related to wound stability, which is partially determined by biomechanical properties and behaviors of oral mu- cosal tissues. Studies on soft tissue behavior under biomechanical forces in oral regeneration models are scarce. Thus, this review aims to (1) contrast the microstructural differences between the attached gingiva (AM) and lining (LM) mucosa; (2) evaluate biomechanical behaviors of the two mucosal types; and (3) relate residual flap tension to the prevalence of wound opening after regenerative procedures. Compositional and structural differences between the AM and LM explain their biomechanical property differences. Wound destabilizers, including tissue recoil stemming from its viscoelastic property, muscle pull, and inflammatory edema (created after the flap-releasing procedure for primary wound closure) in- terfere with wound stability. Residual flap tension < 0.05 N is a prerequisite for sustained wound closure. Tissues under stress can exert negative cellular changes, resulting in necrosis and wound dehiscence. Biomechanical properties and the variations between AM and LM dictate the degree of wound stability. Efforts should be made to reduce the negative impact of the potential destabilizers to optimize wound stability.

口腔粘膜生物力学的叙述性综述以及牙周和种植体相关再生程序的临床意义。
牙周和种植体相关再生程序的愈合结果与伤口稳定性密切相关,伤口稳定性部分由口腔粘膜组织的生物力学特性和行为决定。在口腔再生模型中,对生物力学力作用下的软组织行为的研究很少。这篇综述文章的目的是(1)对比附着牙龈(AM)和内衬(LM)粘膜之间的微观结构差异,(2)评估这两种粘膜类型的生物力学行为,以及(3)将残余皮瓣张力与再生手术后伤口开放的发生率联系起来。结果:AM和LM的组成和结构差异解释了AM和LM之间的生物力学特性差异。伤口不稳定因素,包括由其粘弹性引起的组织反冲、肌肉拉伤和在初次闭合伤口的皮瓣释放程序后产生的炎症性水肿,会干扰伤口的稳定性。襟翼剩余张力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信