Technique Variation in the Surgical Treatment of Lateral Ankle Instability.

Foot & ankle specialist Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1177/19386400231202029
Aaron J Wilke, Robert Martin, Nathaniel A Bates, James R Jastifer, Kevin D Martin
{"title":"Technique Variation in the Surgical Treatment of Lateral Ankle Instability.","authors":"Aaron J Wilke, Robert Martin, Nathaniel A Bates, James R Jastifer, Kevin D Martin","doi":"10.1177/19386400231202029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lateral ankle sprains are the most common type of injury to the ankle and can lead to ankle instability. There are many described techniques for the surgical treatment of lateral ankle instability. The purpose of this study is to quantify the variation in surgeon technique for lateral ankle instability treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were sent to 62 orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons regarding surgical technique for the treatment of lateral ankle instability. Clinical agreement was defined as greater than 80% agreement to assess the cohesiveness of surgical methods as described by Marx et al. Results. Response rate was 49/62 (79%). There was clinical agreement for not using bone tunnels and not using metal anchors. All other factors lacked clinical agreement. A greater average number of throws and knots (4.2 for each, range 1-6 throws, range 2-12 knots) were used by surgeons that do not believe knots cause pain compared to an average of 3.9 (range, 1-6) throws and 4.0 (range, 2-15) knots by surgeons who do believe knots cause pain. The association that surgeon who believed knots do cause pain and thus used fewer knots and throws was not statistically significant (P > .05). The preferred material by surgeons in our study are as follows: nonabsorbable braided suture (26/49, 53%), suture tape (15/49, 31%), and fiber tape (4/49, 8%). Among surgeons who use absorbable suture (34/49, 69%), there was no significant difference (P > .05) between surgeons who believe knots cause pain (23/34, 68%) and those who do not (11/34, 32%).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Among this small sample of orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons, there is wide variation in surgical technique for lateral ankle instability treatment and little agreement on the clinical standard of care. This disagreement highlights the need for comparative outcome studies in the treatment of ankle instability.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong><i>Level III: Retrospective cohort study</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"259-263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400231202029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lateral ankle sprains are the most common type of injury to the ankle and can lead to ankle instability. There are many described techniques for the surgical treatment of lateral ankle instability. The purpose of this study is to quantify the variation in surgeon technique for lateral ankle instability treatment.

Methods: Surveys were sent to 62 orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons regarding surgical technique for the treatment of lateral ankle instability. Clinical agreement was defined as greater than 80% agreement to assess the cohesiveness of surgical methods as described by Marx et al. Results. Response rate was 49/62 (79%). There was clinical agreement for not using bone tunnels and not using metal anchors. All other factors lacked clinical agreement. A greater average number of throws and knots (4.2 for each, range 1-6 throws, range 2-12 knots) were used by surgeons that do not believe knots cause pain compared to an average of 3.9 (range, 1-6) throws and 4.0 (range, 2-15) knots by surgeons who do believe knots cause pain. The association that surgeon who believed knots do cause pain and thus used fewer knots and throws was not statistically significant (P > .05). The preferred material by surgeons in our study are as follows: nonabsorbable braided suture (26/49, 53%), suture tape (15/49, 31%), and fiber tape (4/49, 8%). Among surgeons who use absorbable suture (34/49, 69%), there was no significant difference (P > .05) between surgeons who believe knots cause pain (23/34, 68%) and those who do not (11/34, 32%).

Discussion and conclusion: Among this small sample of orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons, there is wide variation in surgical technique for lateral ankle instability treatment and little agreement on the clinical standard of care. This disagreement highlights the need for comparative outcome studies in the treatment of ankle instability.

Level of evidence: Level III: Retrospective cohort study.

踝关节外侧不稳定手术治疗中的技术变化。
简介:脚踝外侧扭伤是最常见的脚踝损伤类型,可导致脚踝不稳定。有许多描述的手术治疗踝关节外侧不稳定的技术。本研究的目的是量化外科医生治疗踝关节外侧不稳定的技术变化。方法:对62名足部和踝关节整形外科医生进行调查,了解治疗踝关节外侧不稳定的手术技术。临床一致性被定义为超过80%的一致性,以评估Marx等人所描述的手术方法的内聚性。结果。有效率为49/62(79%)。不使用骨隧道和不使用金属锚固件在临床上是一致的。所有其他因素缺乏临床一致性。不相信结会引起疼痛的外科医生使用了更大的平均投掷次数和结数(每次4.2次,范围1-6次,范围2-12节),而相信结会导致疼痛的外科医生平均使用3.9次(范围1-6次)和4.0次(范围2-15次)。外科医生认为打结确实会引起疼痛,因此使用较少的打结和投掷物,这一关联在统计学上并不显著(P>0.05)。在我们的研究中,外科医生首选的材料如下:不可吸收编织缝合线(26/49,53%)、缝合带(15/49,31%)和纤维带(4/49,8%)。在使用可吸收缝线的外科医生中(34/49,69%),认为打结会引起疼痛的外科医生(23/34,68%)和不认为打结会导致疼痛的外科医生之间没有显著差异(P>0.05)(11/34,32%)。讨论和结论:在这一小部分足部和踝关节整形外科医生中,治疗踝关节外侧不稳定的手术技术差异很大,临床护理标准几乎没有一致性。这一分歧突出了在治疗踝关节不稳定方面进行比较结果研究的必要性。证据水平:第三级:回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信