Optimal Performance of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty

IF 2.8 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Tobias Dahlgren MD , Marcelo Ayala MD, PhD , Madeleine Zetterberg MD, PhD
{"title":"Optimal Performance of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty","authors":"Tobias Dahlgren MD ,&nbsp;Marcelo Ayala MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Madeleine Zetterberg MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2023.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a first-line treatment for glaucoma and ocular hypertension. However, due to insufficient comparative evidence in efficacy and safety, several SLT treatment protocols are currently used in practice. The objective of this trial was to compare the clinical outcomes of the 4 most significant SLT variants.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective, multicenter, masked, randomized controlled trial (RCT).</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Four hundred patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The cohort consisted of both treatment-naive patients and patients undergoing glaucoma treatment, at different stages of disease.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Selective laser trabeculoplasty was performed with 50 ± 5 laser spots in 180 degrees or with 100 ± 10 spots in 360 degrees. The laser power was titrated to either just below the cavitation bubble level (“standard energy”) or to a level producing cavitation bubbles at 50% to 75% of laser applications (“high energy”). Thus, 4 different treatment protocols were included – <em>180/standard</em>, <em>180/high</em>, <em>360/standard</em>, and <em>360/high</em>. The study adhered as close as possible to regular clinical management, but within a scientific framework.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) 1 to 6 months after SLT. The proportion of patients achieving a 20% IOP reduction without any further intervention. Time to glaucoma treatment escalation in a Kaplan–Meier survival analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>SLT performed with the 360/high protocol was shown to be superior regarding all primary endpoints. The IOP reduction 1 to 6 months after SLT was 5.4 mmHg in the 360/high group, compared to 3.4, 3.2, and 4.2 mmHg with the 180/standard, 180/high, and 360/standard protocols, respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, the success rate after 6 months was significantly higher –58.3%, compared with 30.2%, 29.3%, and 41.7% (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The median time to glaucoma treatment escalation was more than twice as long with 360/high SLT –1323 days, compared to 437 days, 549 days, and 620 days (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Although postoperative discomfort was more frequent with the 360/high protocol, symptoms were generally mild and transient. Adverse events were rare in all groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The magnitude and longevity of SLT results increases substantially if SLT is performed according to the <em>360/high</em> protocol, without compromising safety. Therefore, we recommend that <em>360/high SLT</em> be considered as standard treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosures</h3><p>The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19519,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 105-115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419623001916/pdfft?md5=7d232a54a729dcdd06dbc8a9dcbeff0b&pid=1-s2.0-S2589419623001916-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419623001916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a first-line treatment for glaucoma and ocular hypertension. However, due to insufficient comparative evidence in efficacy and safety, several SLT treatment protocols are currently used in practice. The objective of this trial was to compare the clinical outcomes of the 4 most significant SLT variants.

Design

Prospective, multicenter, masked, randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Participants

Four hundred patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The cohort consisted of both treatment-naive patients and patients undergoing glaucoma treatment, at different stages of disease.

Methods

Selective laser trabeculoplasty was performed with 50 ± 5 laser spots in 180 degrees or with 100 ± 10 spots in 360 degrees. The laser power was titrated to either just below the cavitation bubble level (“standard energy”) or to a level producing cavitation bubbles at 50% to 75% of laser applications (“high energy”). Thus, 4 different treatment protocols were included – 180/standard, 180/high, 360/standard, and 360/high. The study adhered as close as possible to regular clinical management, but within a scientific framework.

Main Outcome Measures

Reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) 1 to 6 months after SLT. The proportion of patients achieving a 20% IOP reduction without any further intervention. Time to glaucoma treatment escalation in a Kaplan–Meier survival analysis.

Results

SLT performed with the 360/high protocol was shown to be superior regarding all primary endpoints. The IOP reduction 1 to 6 months after SLT was 5.4 mmHg in the 360/high group, compared to 3.4, 3.2, and 4.2 mmHg with the 180/standard, 180/high, and 360/standard protocols, respectively (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the success rate after 6 months was significantly higher –58.3%, compared with 30.2%, 29.3%, and 41.7% (P < 0.001). The median time to glaucoma treatment escalation was more than twice as long with 360/high SLT –1323 days, compared to 437 days, 549 days, and 620 days (P < 0.001). Although postoperative discomfort was more frequent with the 360/high protocol, symptoms were generally mild and transient. Adverse events were rare in all groups.

Conclusions

The magnitude and longevity of SLT results increases substantially if SLT is performed according to the 360/high protocol, without compromising safety. Therefore, we recommend that 360/high SLT be considered as standard treatment.

Financial Disclosures

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

选择性激光小梁成形术的最佳性能瑞典最佳SLT多中心随机对照试验结果。
目的:选择性激光小梁成形术(SLT)是青光眼和高眼压症的一线治疗方法。然而,由于疗效和安全性方面的比较证据不足,目前在实践中使用了几种SLT治疗方案。本试验的目的是比较四种最显著的SLT变体的临床结果。设计:前瞻性、多中心、掩蔽、随机对照试验。参与者:四百名青光眼或高眼压患者。该队列包括处于不同疾病阶段的治疗幼稚患者和接受青光眼治疗的患者。方法:SLT采用180度50±5个激光点,360度100±10个激光点。激光功率被滴定到刚好低于空化气泡水平(“标准能量”)或在50-75%的激光应用中产生空化气泡的水平(“高能量”)。因此,包括了四种不同的治疗方案——180/标准、180/高、360/标准和360/高。该研究尽可能接近常规临床管理,但在科学框架内。主要观察指标:SLT术后1-6个月眼压下降。在没有任何进一步干预的情况下实现20%IOP降低的患者比例。Kaplan-Meier生存分析中青光眼治疗升级的时间。结果:使用360/high方案进行的SLT在所有主要终点方面都显示出优越性。360/高组SLT后1-6个月的IOP降低为5.4 mmHg,而180/标准、180/高和360/标准方案的IOP分别为3.4、3.2和4.2 mmHg,结论:如果按照360/high方案进行SLT,在不影响安全性的情况下,SLT结果的幅度和寿命会显著增加。因此,我们建议将360/highSLT视为标准治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
46 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信