Saliva as an alternative sample type for detection of pneumococcal carriage in young children.

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Anne L Wyllie, Nynke Y Rots, Alienke J Wijmenga-Monsuur, Marlies A van Houten, Elisabeth A M Sanders, Krzysztof Trzciński
{"title":"Saliva as an alternative sample type for detection of pneumococcal carriage in young children.","authors":"Anne L Wyllie, Nynke Y Rots, Alienke J Wijmenga-Monsuur, Marlies A van Houten, Elisabeth A M Sanders, Krzysztof Trzciński","doi":"10.1099/mic.0.001394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For children, the gold standard for the detection of pneumococcal carriage is conventional culture of a nasopharyngeal swab. Saliva, however, has a history as one of the most sensitive methods for surveillance of pneumococcal colonization and has recently been shown to improve carriage detection in older age groups. Here, we compared the sensitivity of paired nasopharyngeal and saliva samples from PCV7-vaccinated 24-month-old children for pneumococcal carriage detection using conventional and molecular detection methods. Nasopharyngeal and saliva samples were collected from 288 24-month-old children during the autumn/winter, 2012/2013. All samples were first processed by conventional diagnostic culture. Next, DNA extracted from all plate growth was tested by qPCR for the presence of the pneumococcal genes <i>piaB</i> and <i>lytA</i> and a subset of serotypes. By culture, 161/288 (60 %) nasopharyngeal swabs tested positive for pneumococcus, but detection was not possible from saliva due to abundant polymicrobial growth on culture plates. By qPCR, 155/288 (54 %) culture-enriched saliva samples and 187/288 (65 %) nasopharyngeal swabs tested positive. Altogether, 219/288 (76 %) infants tested positive for pneumococcus, with qPCR-based carriage detection of culture-enriched nasopharyngeal swabs detecting significantly more carriers compared to either conventional culture (<i>P</i><0.001) or qPCR detection of saliva (<i>P</i>=0.002). However, 32/219 (15 %) carriers were only positive in saliva, contributing significantly to the overall number of carriers detected (<i>P</i>=0.002). While testing nasopharyngeal swabs by qPCR proved most sensitive for pneumococcal detection in infants, saliva sampling could be considered as complementary to provide additional information on carriage and serotypes that may not be detected in the nasopharynx and may be particularly useful in longitudinal studies, requiring repeated sampling of study participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":49819,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology-Sgm","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology-Sgm","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.001394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For children, the gold standard for the detection of pneumococcal carriage is conventional culture of a nasopharyngeal swab. Saliva, however, has a history as one of the most sensitive methods for surveillance of pneumococcal colonization and has recently been shown to improve carriage detection in older age groups. Here, we compared the sensitivity of paired nasopharyngeal and saliva samples from PCV7-vaccinated 24-month-old children for pneumococcal carriage detection using conventional and molecular detection methods. Nasopharyngeal and saliva samples were collected from 288 24-month-old children during the autumn/winter, 2012/2013. All samples were first processed by conventional diagnostic culture. Next, DNA extracted from all plate growth was tested by qPCR for the presence of the pneumococcal genes piaB and lytA and a subset of serotypes. By culture, 161/288 (60 %) nasopharyngeal swabs tested positive for pneumococcus, but detection was not possible from saliva due to abundant polymicrobial growth on culture plates. By qPCR, 155/288 (54 %) culture-enriched saliva samples and 187/288 (65 %) nasopharyngeal swabs tested positive. Altogether, 219/288 (76 %) infants tested positive for pneumococcus, with qPCR-based carriage detection of culture-enriched nasopharyngeal swabs detecting significantly more carriers compared to either conventional culture (P<0.001) or qPCR detection of saliva (P=0.002). However, 32/219 (15 %) carriers were only positive in saliva, contributing significantly to the overall number of carriers detected (P=0.002). While testing nasopharyngeal swabs by qPCR proved most sensitive for pneumococcal detection in infants, saliva sampling could be considered as complementary to provide additional information on carriage and serotypes that may not be detected in the nasopharynx and may be particularly useful in longitudinal studies, requiring repeated sampling of study participants.

唾液作为检测幼儿肺炎球菌携带的替代样本类型。
对于儿童来说,检测肺炎球菌携带的金标准是鼻咽拭子的常规培养。然而,唾液历来是监测肺炎球菌定植最敏感的方法之一,最近被证明可以改善老年群体的携带检测。在这里,我们比较了来自接种PCV7疫苗的24个月大儿童的配对鼻咽和唾液样本使用常规和分子检测方法检测肺炎球菌携带的敏感性。在2012/2013秋冬期间,从288名24个月大的儿童身上采集了鼻咽和唾液样本。所有样品首先通过常规诊断培养进行处理。接下来,通过qPCR检测从所有平板生长中提取的DNA是否存在肺炎球菌基因piaB和lytA以及血清型的一个子集。按文化分类,161/288(60 %) 鼻咽拭子检测出肺炎球菌呈阳性,但由于培养板上有大量的多微生物生长,无法从唾液中检测到。通过qPCR,155/288(54 %) 富含培养物的唾液样本和187/288(65 %) 鼻咽拭子检测呈阳性。总计219/288(76 %) 婴儿肺炎球菌检测呈阳性,与传统培养相比,基于qPCR的培养富集鼻咽拭子携带检测可检测到明显更多的携带者(PP=0.002)。然而,32/219(15 %) 携带者仅在唾液中呈阳性,对检测到的携带者总数有显著贡献(P=0.002)。虽然qPCR检测鼻咽拭子对婴儿肺炎球菌检测最敏感,唾液采样可以被视为补充,以提供鼻咽中可能检测不到的携带和血清型的额外信息,并且在纵向研究中可能特别有用,需要对研究参与者进行重复采样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiology-Sgm
Microbiology-Sgm 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
132
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: We publish high-quality original research on bacteria, fungi, protists, archaea, algae, parasites and other microscopic life forms. Topics include but are not limited to: Antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance Bacteriology and parasitology Biochemistry and biophysics Biofilms and biological systems Biotechnology and bioremediation Cell biology and signalling Chemical biology Cross-disciplinary work Ecology and environmental microbiology Food microbiology Genetics Host–microbe interactions Microbial methods and techniques Microscopy and imaging Omics, including genomics, proteomics and metabolomics Physiology and metabolism Systems biology and synthetic biology The microbiome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信