J-P Aravena-Salazar, G Matus-Miranda, J Dethlefs-Canto, S-E Niklander
{"title":"New complementary alternatives in third molar autotransplantation: A systematic review.","authors":"J-P Aravena-Salazar, G Matus-Miranda, J Dethlefs-Canto, S-E Niklander","doi":"10.4317/medoral.26233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental autotransplantation (DAT) is defined as the replacement or direct transfer of an impacted, semi-impacted or erupted tooth to a donor site, either to a post-extraction socket or to a surgically created socket within the same individual. The use of new technological advances, such as 3-D dental models based on computer-aided design, among others, have been reported to improve the success rate of DAT. Therefore, we aimed to perform a systematic review to explore the possible benefits that the use of these innovative techniques can provide when applied to DAT.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases following the PRISMA guidelines. The research question was: \"Are computerized technological advancements a useful tool for improving the success of third molar autotransplantation technique?</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial literature search identified 195 articles, of which only 11 were included for qualitative analysis. All studies used 3D dental models based on computer-aided design data. Surgical guides and stereolithographic models were used by 4 and 1 study respectively. A total of 91 transplanted teeth were evaluated, out of which only 88 were considered within the parameters of clinical success (96.7%). Only 7 out of the 11 articles reported the specific autotransplanted tooth, being mandibular third molars the most prevalent autotransplanted teeth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the application of new technologies for DAT increases the success rate of this technique, further primary studies are still needed to address long-term teeth survival rates and complications. The cost and availability to implement the integration of these techniques to DAT may be a variable to consider, as this can be a limitation for some patients or for low-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":49016,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","volume":" ","pages":"e241-e247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10945862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.26233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Dental autotransplantation (DAT) is defined as the replacement or direct transfer of an impacted, semi-impacted or erupted tooth to a donor site, either to a post-extraction socket or to a surgically created socket within the same individual. The use of new technological advances, such as 3-D dental models based on computer-aided design, among others, have been reported to improve the success rate of DAT. Therefore, we aimed to perform a systematic review to explore the possible benefits that the use of these innovative techniques can provide when applied to DAT.
Material and methods: The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases following the PRISMA guidelines. The research question was: "Are computerized technological advancements a useful tool for improving the success of third molar autotransplantation technique?
Results: The initial literature search identified 195 articles, of which only 11 were included for qualitative analysis. All studies used 3D dental models based on computer-aided design data. Surgical guides and stereolithographic models were used by 4 and 1 study respectively. A total of 91 transplanted teeth were evaluated, out of which only 88 were considered within the parameters of clinical success (96.7%). Only 7 out of the 11 articles reported the specific autotransplanted tooth, being mandibular third molars the most prevalent autotransplanted teeth.
Conclusions: Although the application of new technologies for DAT increases the success rate of this technique, further primary studies are still needed to address long-term teeth survival rates and complications. The cost and availability to implement the integration of these techniques to DAT may be a variable to consider, as this can be a limitation for some patients or for low-income countries.
背景:牙齿自体移植(DAT)被定义为将受影响、半受影响或萌出的牙齿替换或直接转移到供体部位,或者转移到拔出后的牙槽窝,或者在同一个体内通过手术形成的牙槽窝。据报道,使用新的技术进步,如基于计算机辅助设计的三维牙科模型等,可以提高DAT的成功率。因此,我们旨在进行系统综述,以探索这些创新技术在应用于DAT时可能带来的好处。材料和方法:根据PRISMA指南,在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中进行文献检索。研究问题是:“计算机技术进步是提高第三磨牙自体种植技术成功率的有用工具吗?结果:最初的文献检索确定了195篇文章,其中只有11篇被纳入定性分析。所有研究都使用了基于计算机辅助设计数据的3D牙体模型。分别有4和1项研究使用了手术指南和立体光刻模型有效地。共评估了91颗移植牙,其中只有88颗在临床成功的范围内(96.7%)。11篇文章中只有7篇报道了特定的自体种植牙,下颌第三磨牙是最常见的自体种植牙齿。结论:尽管DAT新技术的应用提高了该技术的成功率,但仍需要进一步的初步研究来解决长期牙齿存活率和并发症。将这些技术集成到DAT的成本和可用性可能是一个需要考虑的变量,因为这可能会对一些患者或低收入国家造成限制。
期刊介绍:
1. Oral Medicine and Pathology:
Clinicopathological as well as medical or surgical management aspects of
diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, as well as
orofacial neurological disorders, and systemic conditions with an impact on
the oral cavity.
2. Oral Surgery:
Surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands,
maxillary bones, teeth, implants, oral surgical procedures. Surgical management
of diseases affecting head and neck areas.
3. Medically compromised patients in Dentistry:
Articles discussing medical problems in Odontology will also be included, with
a special focus on the clinico-odontological management of medically compromised patients, and considerations regarding high-risk or disabled patients.
4. Implantology
5. Periodontology