Endeavouring interplay: a grounded theory study of how nurse educators' work with simulation-based learning.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Kari Røykenes, Monika Kvernenes, Tove Giske
{"title":"Endeavouring interplay: a grounded theory study of how nurse educators' work with simulation-based learning.","authors":"Kari Røykenes, Monika Kvernenes, Tove Giske","doi":"10.1186/s12912-023-01546-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation-based learning is frequently used as a teaching and learning strategy in nursing and other health professions educations, and educators have a key role as facilitators. This facilitator role provides them with a particularly relevant perspective to help us understand and theorize around the essence of simulation-based learning, and how it is approached. This study aims to explore nurse educators' experiences and strategies in simulation-based learning.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected in 2018-2021 using in-depth interviews with eight nurse educators. Transcripts were analysed through constant comparison using Classical Grounded Theory approach.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The participants' main concern was how to Maximize students' learning-space in simulation. To resolve this, four strategies were identified: legitimizing simulation, self-development, preparing students, and tailoring simulation. Legitimisation, and self-development were found to be important prerequisites for developing the learning space and were therefore defined as the background or context of the theory. Nurse students were the focus of the two remaining categories, preparing students and tailoring simulation, and are thus defined as being in the foreground of the theory. The dynamics of these four strategies were captured in the Grounded theory of Endeavouring interplay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The theory of Endeavouring interplay illustrates the complexity educators are encountering when aiming to optimize simulation as a learning space for nurse students. The strategies used are adapted to the organisational climate, available resources and context, and include striving to legitimize simulation, pursue self-development in the role as facilitator, help students prepare for simulation-based learning, and tailor the simulation to both contextual factors and individual student needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"22 1","pages":"377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01546-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Simulation-based learning is frequently used as a teaching and learning strategy in nursing and other health professions educations, and educators have a key role as facilitators. This facilitator role provides them with a particularly relevant perspective to help us understand and theorize around the essence of simulation-based learning, and how it is approached. This study aims to explore nurse educators' experiences and strategies in simulation-based learning.

Method: Data were collected in 2018-2021 using in-depth interviews with eight nurse educators. Transcripts were analysed through constant comparison using Classical Grounded Theory approach.

Result: The participants' main concern was how to Maximize students' learning-space in simulation. To resolve this, four strategies were identified: legitimizing simulation, self-development, preparing students, and tailoring simulation. Legitimisation, and self-development were found to be important prerequisites for developing the learning space and were therefore defined as the background or context of the theory. Nurse students were the focus of the two remaining categories, preparing students and tailoring simulation, and are thus defined as being in the foreground of the theory. The dynamics of these four strategies were captured in the Grounded theory of Endeavouring interplay.

Conclusion: The theory of Endeavouring interplay illustrates the complexity educators are encountering when aiming to optimize simulation as a learning space for nurse students. The strategies used are adapted to the organisational climate, available resources and context, and include striving to legitimize simulation, pursue self-development in the role as facilitator, help students prepare for simulation-based learning, and tailor the simulation to both contextual factors and individual student needs.

Abstract Image

努力的相互作用:一项关于护士教育工作者如何使用模拟学习的基础理论研究。
背景:在护理和其他卫生专业的教育中,基于模拟的学习经常被用作教学策略,教育工作者作为促进者发挥着关键作用。这个促进者角色为他们提供了一个特别相关的视角,帮助我们理解和理论化基于模拟的学习的本质,以及如何处理它。本研究旨在探讨护士教育工作者在模拟学习中的经验和策略。方法:数据收集于2018-2021年,采用对8名护士教育工作者的深入访谈。使用经典基础理论方法通过不断比较来分析转录本。结果:参与者主要关心的是如何在模拟中最大限度地扩大学生的学习空间。为了解决这一问题,确定了四种策略:使模拟合法化、自我发展、为学生做好准备和定制模拟。合法化和自我发展被认为是开发学习空间的重要先决条件,因此被定义为理论的背景或背景。护士生是剩下的两类学生的重点,即准备学生和裁剪模拟,因此被定义为处于理论的前沿。这四种策略的动力体现在努力相互作用的基础理论中。结论:努力相互作用的理论说明了教育工作者在优化模拟作为护生学习空间时所遇到的复杂性。所使用的策略适应了组织环境、可用资源和环境,包括努力使模拟合法化,以促进者的身份追求自我发展,帮助学生为基于模拟的学习做好准备,并根据环境因素和学生个人需求定制模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信