Grasping Discriminates between Object Sizes Less Not More Accurately than the Perceptual System.

Q2 Medicine
Frederic Göhringer, Miriam Löhr-Limpens, Constanze Hesse, Thomas Schenk
{"title":"Grasping Discriminates between Object Sizes Less Not More Accurately than the Perceptual System.","authors":"Frederic Göhringer,&nbsp;Miriam Löhr-Limpens,&nbsp;Constanze Hesse,&nbsp;Thomas Schenk","doi":"10.3390/vision3030036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ganel, Freud, Chajut, and Algom (2012) demonstrated that maximum grip apertures (MGAs) differ significantly when grasping perceptually identical objects. From this finding they concluded that the visual size information used by the motor system is more accurate than the visual size information available to the perceptual system. A direct comparison between the accuracy in the perception and the action system is, however, problematic, given that accuracy in the perceptual task is measured using a dichotomous variable, while accuracy in the visuomotor task is determined using a continuous variable. We addressed this problem by dichotomizing the visuomotor measures. Using this approach, our results show that size discrimination in grasping is in fact inferior to perceptual discrimination therefore contradicting the original suggestion put forward by Ganel and colleagues.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3390/vision3030036","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision (Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision3030036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Ganel, Freud, Chajut, and Algom (2012) demonstrated that maximum grip apertures (MGAs) differ significantly when grasping perceptually identical objects. From this finding they concluded that the visual size information used by the motor system is more accurate than the visual size information available to the perceptual system. A direct comparison between the accuracy in the perception and the action system is, however, problematic, given that accuracy in the perceptual task is measured using a dichotomous variable, while accuracy in the visuomotor task is determined using a continuous variable. We addressed this problem by dichotomizing the visuomotor measures. Using this approach, our results show that size discrimination in grasping is in fact inferior to perceptual discrimination therefore contradicting the original suggestion put forward by Ganel and colleagues.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

抓取在物体大小之间的判别比感知系统准确得多。
Ganel、Freud、Chajut和Algom(2012)证明,当抓取感知相同的物体时,最大抓取孔径(MGA)显著不同。根据这一发现,他们得出结论,运动系统使用的视觉尺寸信息比感知系统可用的视觉尺寸更准确。然而,考虑到感知任务的准确性是使用二分法变量测量的,而视觉运动任务的准确性则是使用连续变量确定的,因此感知和动作系统的准确性之间的直接比较是有问题的。我们通过对视觉运动测量进行二分来解决这个问题。使用这种方法,我们的结果表明,抓握中的尺寸辨别实际上不如感知辨别,因此与Ganel及其同事最初提出的建议相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vision (Switzerland)
Vision (Switzerland) Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信