Intraperitoneal and incisional ropivacaine did not improve postoperative analgesia after multimodal anaesthesia compared with saline in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
K Kazmir-Lysak, B Steblaj, P R Torgerson, A P N Kutter, F Restitutti, I S Henze
{"title":"Intraperitoneal and incisional ropivacaine did not improve postoperative analgesia after multimodal anaesthesia compared with saline in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy.","authors":"K Kazmir-Lysak, B Steblaj, P R Torgerson, A P N Kutter, F Restitutti, I S Henze","doi":"doi.org/10.17236/sat00405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraperitoneal administration of local anaesthetics may reduce postoperative pain after ovariohysterectomy in dogs. The aim of this prospective, randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial was to compare postoperative analgesia and opioid requirements after intraperitoneal and incisional administration of ropivacaine versus 0,9 % NaCl (saline). Forty-three client-owned dogs were enrolled in the study and anaesthetised using a standardized protocol that included premedication with acepromazine (0,03-0,05 mg/kg) and dexmedetomidine (0,01 mg/kg) intramuscularly. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol titrated to effect and ketamine (1 mg/kg) intravenously and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. The analgesic regimen included carprofen (4 mg/kg) subcutaneously and morphine (0,2 mg/kg) intravenously. Depending on group assignment, each dog received either an intraperitoneal and incisional splash with ropivacaine (2 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg, respectively) (group R), or an equal volume of saline (group S). Buprenorphine (0,02 mg/kg) was administered intramuscularly once the uterus was removed. Sedation and pain were assessed 0,5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours after extubation using a sedation scale, the short form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale (CMPS-SF) and a dynamic interactive visual analogue scale (DIVAS). Postoperatively, buprenorphine (0,01 mg/kg) was administered intravenously if dogs scored 6/24 on CMPS-SF. The ordinal mixed model showed no difference in pain scores between groups. Fisher's exact test showed no significant difference in postoperative buprenorphine requirements between group S (3/22 dogs) and group R (1/21 dogs) at the doses used. In addition, lower sedation scores were associated with higher DIVAS scores. In this multimodal analgesic protocol, ropivacaine could not improve analgesia compared to saline.</p>","PeriodicalId":21544,"journal":{"name":"Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde","volume":"165 10","pages":"634-643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/doi.org/10.17236/sat00405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intraperitoneal administration of local anaesthetics may reduce postoperative pain after ovariohysterectomy in dogs. The aim of this prospective, randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial was to compare postoperative analgesia and opioid requirements after intraperitoneal and incisional administration of ropivacaine versus 0,9 % NaCl (saline). Forty-three client-owned dogs were enrolled in the study and anaesthetised using a standardized protocol that included premedication with acepromazine (0,03-0,05 mg/kg) and dexmedetomidine (0,01 mg/kg) intramuscularly. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol titrated to effect and ketamine (1 mg/kg) intravenously and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. The analgesic regimen included carprofen (4 mg/kg) subcutaneously and morphine (0,2 mg/kg) intravenously. Depending on group assignment, each dog received either an intraperitoneal and incisional splash with ropivacaine (2 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg, respectively) (group R), or an equal volume of saline (group S). Buprenorphine (0,02 mg/kg) was administered intramuscularly once the uterus was removed. Sedation and pain were assessed 0,5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours after extubation using a sedation scale, the short form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale (CMPS-SF) and a dynamic interactive visual analogue scale (DIVAS). Postoperatively, buprenorphine (0,01 mg/kg) was administered intravenously if dogs scored 6/24 on CMPS-SF. The ordinal mixed model showed no difference in pain scores between groups. Fisher's exact test showed no significant difference in postoperative buprenorphine requirements between group S (3/22 dogs) and group R (1/21 dogs) at the doses used. In addition, lower sedation scores were associated with higher DIVAS scores. In this multimodal analgesic protocol, ropivacaine could not improve analgesia compared to saline.

在接受卵巢子宫切除术的狗中,与生理盐水相比,腹膜内和切口罗哌卡因在多模式麻醉后并没有改善术后镇痛。
引言:在犬卵巢子宫切除术后,腹膜内给予局部麻醉剂可以减轻术后疼痛。这项前瞻性、随机、盲法、安慰剂对照临床试验的目的是比较腹膜内和切口给药罗哌卡因与0.9后的术后镇痛和阿片类药物需求 % NaCl(盐水)。43只客户饲养的狗被纳入研究,并使用标准化方案进行麻醉,其中包括使用乙酰丙嗪(0,03-0,05 mg/kg)和右美托咪定(0,01 mg/kg)。丙泊酚和氯胺酮(1 mg/kg)静脉内注射并用异氟烷在氧气中维持。镇痛方案包括卡洛芬(4 mg/kg)和吗啡(0,2 mg/kg)静脉注射。根据分组情况,每只狗接受罗哌卡因腹膜内和切口喷溅(2 mg/kg和1 mg/kg)(R组)或等体积的生理盐水(S组)。丁丙诺啡(0,02 mg/kg)肌肉内给药。拔管后0.5、1、2、4、6和8小时,使用镇静量表、格拉斯哥综合疼痛量表(CMPS-SF)和动态交互式视觉模拟量表(DIVAS)对镇静和疼痛进行评估。术后,丁丙诺啡(0,01 mg/kg)静脉内给药,如果狗在CMPS-SF上得分为6/24。顺序混合模型显示各组之间的疼痛评分没有差异。Fisher精确测试显示,在所用剂量下,s组(3/22只狗)和R组(1/21只狗)的术后丁丙诺啡需求量没有显著差异。此外,较低的镇静评分与较高的DIVAS评分相关。在这种多模式镇痛方案中,与生理盐水相比,罗哌卡因不能改善镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde
Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Das Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde ist die älteste veterinärmedizinische Zeitschrift der Welt (gegründet 1816). Es ist das wissenschaftliche und praxisbezogene offizielle Publikationsorgan der Gesellschaft Schweizer Tierärztinnen und Tierärzte.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信